Bishops at the Trough
Time was when the poor
widow in the pew gave her mite, assured that she was helping someone
even more vulnerable than she was. That is no longer true, as the
money being given may or may not end up feeding the poor, clothing the
naked, etc. Two of the "Catholic" charities sanctioned by the
bishops have become circuitous routes leading to unexpected ends.
The Catholic
Campaign for Human Development, as tracked by Stephanie Block in her
scholarly article, "Shooting Ourselves in the Feet: How One of the Most
Potent Weapons Serving the 'Culture of Death' Lies in the Pockets of
Catholic Donors" (Catholic Citizens.Org 9/15/2003) exposed the
labyrinth of entities used to divert money to causes most
Catholics would not support. CCHD is not a Catholic charity,
strictly speaking, as its literature casually points out. From
money given by Catholics, grants are made mainly to groups who agitate,
politically or otherwise, for causes many Catholics know nothing about,
and would not give their money to, if they knew. A current prominent
cause is the promotion of illegal immigration. This takes the
shape of supporting groups who are formed to lobby politically for
illegal immigration. It is one example of how money is spent, mostly
without the knowledge or acquiesence of Catholics who do not want to
aid and abet lawbreakers (illegal aliens). Catholics have always been
taught to obey the laws of their countries, and that the end does not
justify the means.
Catholic Charities
USA lays out on its website the amount of lobbying being done to
influence lawmakers to effect its "social justice" programs.
CCUSA also mentions that it helps all people, regardless of race,
religion, etc. It, too, advocates aggressively for illegal
immigration. Most of its advocacy could have been lifted from the
Democrat platform. For example, CCUSA lobbies for the DREAM Act,
which would allow children of illegal aliens to take advantage of
in-state tuition. Since most colleges have tight enrollment
capacity, this would mean that some citizens would be passed over in
favor of children of illegals. Even the term "illegal" is
anathema to CCUSA and like-minded supporters, who say that nobody
should be classified as illegal. Of course, that is the term the
U.S. government gives to those who come into this country without
permission. CCUSA has been successful in blurring the line
between legal and illegal. Most people would support legal immigration,
with its checks and balances, but more than seventy percent of
Americans polled say they want illegal immigration stopped.
Apparently, the bishops have determined that this country doesn't have
enough poor people, so we must import poverty.
From birth (free for
anyone who goes into a hospital in America) through Head Start and
higher education, through all the welfare systems, CCUSA is there to
lobby our lawmakers. It seems that the bishops have given up on
pure charities, such as St. Vincent de Paul, in favor of putting their
considerable clout behind lobbying government for their social justice
programs. In some dioceses St. Vincent de Paul is treated like
the proverbial stepchild and receives little or no support from the
Catholic charities. Pro-life groups are given lip service, but
not the power of the bishops in personnel, publicity or funds.
The U. S. Conference of Catholic Bishops did not agree with the Vatican
when it indicated that politicians who publicly support pro-abortion
groups and positions should not be given communion. Dare we ask
if it was because to do so would have weakened its traditional allies,
the Democrats, at election time?
Many Cathlolics have
remarked on the seeming enigma of their bishops' lukewarm support of
pro-life groups, in contradiction to Pope John Paul's strong advocacy
of the same groups. Have the bishops agreed to emphasize only the
social gospel and ignore the most vulnerable of their flocks, the
babies in the womb? A search of CCUSA's website yields no
apparent advocacy of pro-life efforts. Where were the bishops
when Terri Schiavo was being deprived of food and water? In fact,
where was her own shepherd in Florida while she was left to die?
Some bishops have spoken out for pro-life causes, but they receive
little publicity.
Is pure charity and
advocacy for life of no value to CCUSA? Is no tax too great, no
government program too expensive and expansive, for support from
CCUSA? It is fair to ask if the bishops have lined up at the
government trough.
E-Mail
www.catholictradition.org/anno-domini2.htm