by Pauly Fongemie
April 7, 2013:
DIVINE MERCY SUNDAY
PERSECUTION: Turning Point and
Destiny
On Saturday I viewed a C-SPAN presentation on the growing
worldwide persecution of Christians, including America; the panel [with
moderator] consisted of three
authors who had co-written their just published book, PERSECUTED. One
of
the authors was Nina Shea who has been interviewed on EWTN. It could
not have been more timely from an American perspective, for on the same
day THE REMNANT reported on our own government's persecution of
Catholics, among other Christian faiths, that are deemed "religious
extremist." The article, by editor Michael Matt, can be found here at
this link:
http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/
http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2013-0331-mjm-cattle-cars-for-everyone.htm
The article is the first on the page for now, when archived you will be
able to find the link at least for a short period of time, and we
trust, always available, for:
It is
masterfully written, filled with insight; in fact it is a virtual
catechism or primer for us Catholics, not only the why, but the what
and how, what we must do and not do, how we are to conduct ourselves in
the coming days of our persecution, and I mean this quite literally,
which are
nigh at hand. Mr. Matt's piece is a call, not to arms in the
traditional political
sense, but a call to arms of: prayer, mortification, steadfastness and
forgiveness for those who will do such awful things to us, not for
anything we do or might do, but only for what we believe, one tenet of
which is that objectively taken, THERE IS NO SALVATION OUTSIDE OF THE
CHURCH. Subjectively, the Church has always taught that those who are
invincibly ignorant, that is, through no fault of their own, are exempt
from blame in this regard. And if they are saved it is through the
graces
bestowed on them in some way by the Church through the infinite mercy
of God, although you and I and others may not always be cognizant of
this merciful grace in the life of any one person.
Two tears ago I recognized that we had reached the turning point here
in
the States, before the full
crushing force of Obama care --- that we had a rendezvous with a
life-changing destiny, unimaginable up till then. I had
occasion to watch a program of Raymond Arroyo's on EWTN, THE WORLD
OVER LIVE, in which a US chaplain serving our country was told that he
was not permitted to use the name of Our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ,
in a funeral service for a slain soldier.
While not actually enforced per se
for now, once the "policy" was exposed, it was however, not
removed from the list of unpatriotic infractions, but simply set aside until the
time is ripe to re-impose it with vigor and full penalty.
Still, one could not be accused of extremism if one deduced that the
"ban" on Christ was at least intimidating to the less hardy soul and
that perhaps that suffices for the time being for the intolerant and
craven beholden to
the real extremist power-brokers in the world. Perhaps the US Supreme
Court is still so uncertain as to give pause momentarily for these mad
men bent on eradicating all trace of Jesus Christ from our national
life. One more liberal-infested justice gratis Obama and all bets are off.
Just, as the training manual by the US Army Reserve has been exposed
for its
bigotry, the powers that be are claiming, not convincingly at all, that
it was just "a mistake." Mr. Matt is not certain they mean it and
neither am I, simply because of the government's politically correct
pusillanimity [Paul Marshall, one of the PERSECUTED co-authors] where
religious freedom is concerned. Now that Obama care's mandate forcing
persons of religious faith to pay for
abortion-contraception-sterilzation insurance coverage, services they
do not want and ought not pay for, is still not settled, we might as
well, for the present time anyway, add this to the increasing attacks
on freedom of belief and
practice, since we know the US government felt "free" to "unfree us"
from freedom of worship in its so-called edict to that chaplain. Other
chaplains told of the same, but refused to comply and remain as yet
unmolested. But just think of the unmitigated hubris, the audacity and
contempt for the holy Name of Jesus Christ in preference for
"sensitivity" to non-Christian sects which apparently have some kind of
veto power over our worship, while maintaining freedom for theirs. We
also note in bold for contemplation, that freedom of religion or
belief, freedom of practice and worship are not equivalent. Our
government cynically and brazenly lying pretends that because they are
not
commanding us to believe something as not true, that this is the same
as
practice and worship, and thus we are still free, although it is
plainer than plain that worship and practice are being restricted
slowly --- the proverbial pot heating up as the public is conditioned
psychologically --- and if we should comply why then the belief will
fade into memory, just as surely as the natural law has ever since
abortion. Forty years of mass murder and what is the natural law
anymore to us? We ought to pause here also to note that Allah is not
verboten still. A double standard? Of course with three alarm bells,
but what else is new, actually, given the trajectory of our deplorably
sad religious indifferent state creed that always ends up persecuting
religious Truth. Why does this seem to always happen, you ask?
Beside the aforementioned politically correct imbecility and
irrationality, there are four aspects of human nature at work --- the
baser inclinations, that is:
The first is irony itself. An important part of the Catholic creed is
that we do not retaliate against our persecutors in following Christ to
the letter and in His spirit. That is why I wrote my just published
column on the bashing of "Bible-thumpers" by Bill O'Reilly & Co.
Those mediaperts who rose to his defense of that bigoted term insist
that we are making too much of it. They remain undeterred, however,
because they know we will be insulted up to our eyeballs and not attack
back, that we resist hatred, revenge, etc. and, rather, forgive and
pray for those who abuse and misunderstand us. This is one of the
reasons why the assault on Christians is unabated and gathering steam
full blast. As I put it in Tempest in a Teapot,
April 3: " ... make no mistake this term "Bible
thumpers" is an insult to them [meaning Christians], and most
especially to God, the
ultimate author of the Bible and the author of Truth Who is all Truth
...: I recall hearing that phrase, along with "mackerel snappers"
for us Catholics and Protestants back in the 50s. Believe me, we knew
it was meant to sting, to marginalize us. It mattered not to those who
disparaged our cherished beliefs that we were and are bound to forgive
them. In fact they considered this aspect the frosting on the cake as
they could act hypocritically with impunity, knowing full well that we
knew it, too." Basic human nature #101.
The other three aspects are written about in a chapter from his book,
LIFT UP YOUR HEART, 1950, by Ven. Archbishop Fulton Sheen [text in red]:
The way we
live has an
influence on the way we think. This is not a denial of the intellectual
factors in belief, but merely an attempt to emphasize a neglected
element. Some people imagine that they can bring a person to Divine
Love merely by answering a doubt he has expressed. They assume that
men are irreligious only because they are ignorant; that if atheists
read a few good books or listened to a few choice arguments in favor of
Divinity, they would immediately embrace the Faith. Religion seems to
them to be a thing to be known,
rather than a Personality to be embraced
and lived and
loved. But our Divine Lord, Who is Truth itself,
could not convince the Pharisees and certain sinners; they were
intellectually confounded by His knowledge so that, after one
encounter, no man dared question Him again—but
still they did not
believe. Christ told those who watched the resurrection of Lazarus that
some of them would not believe, though one rose daily from the dead.
Intellectual knowledge is not the "one thing necessary": not all the
Ph.D.'s are Saints, and the ignorant are not demons. Indeed, a
certain type of education may simply turn a man from a stupid egotist
into a clever egotist, and of the two
the former has the better chance
of salvation. [Emphasis in bold added.]
Many men today are ignorant, full of prejudice and misinformation about
the Faith, and it is regrettable that they have had no opportunity for
instruction, for acquiring knowledge of the Truth. But though God can
be discovered by study, instruction, and reading, these alone will not
bring one to God. There must also be a willingness to accept the Truth
personally, that is, in all its implications. It is easy to find Truth;
it is hard to face it, and harder still to follow it. Modern
education
is geared to what it calls "extending the frontiers of truth," and
sometimes this ideal is prized and used to excuse men from
acting on old truths already discovered. The discovery of the size of a
distant star creates no moral obligation; but the old truths about the
nature and destiny of man can be a reproach to the way one lives.
Some
psychologists and sociologists like to rap their knuckles at the door
of truth about mankind, but they would run away if the door ever
opened, showing man's contingency on God. The only people who ever
arrive at a knowledge of God are those who, when the door is opened,
accept that Truth and shoulder the responsibilities it brings. It
requires more courage than brains to learn to know God: God is the most
obvious fact of human experience, but accepting Him is one of the most
arduous. The moral conditions for knowing Divine Truth are, next
to
Grace, the most important requisites for conversion. There are,
indeed, some who do not come to the Truth because they do not know it;
but there are many more who do not come because of their present
behavior. It is not the way they think, but the way they live which
constitutes the obstacle to union with the Spirit. It is not the Creed
that keeps most people away from Christ and His Mystical Body; it is
the Commandments. The intellectual factors of belief are
generally
known, as is the important factor of Divine illumination; but here we
wish to concentrate upon three neglected factors influencing a
man's assent to Divine Truth:
1. Good will.
2. Living up to the Truth he already knows.
3. Habits of living.
Why is it, when a strong intellectual argument for the Faith is given
to person A and person B, that A will accept and B will not? Since the
cause is the same, the effect ought to be the same—but
it is not.
There must be some other factor present which makes one man embrace,
the other reject, the Truth—something in the mind
it touches. A light striking a wall appears different from a light
striking a window. Similarly this x factor, which makes for the
rejection of Divine Truth in one case and its embrace in the other, is
the will. As St. Thomas put it in his finely chiseled way: "Divine
things are known in different ways by men according to the diversity of
their attitudes. Those who have good will perceive Divine
things according to Truth; those who have not good will perceive them
in a confused way which makes them doubt and feel that they are
mistaken." What a man
will intellectually accept depends to a great extent on what man is or
what he wants to be. The will, instead of admitting a truth presented
to the mind, can ward it off and bar it out. God's pursuit of a mind is
bound to fail unless the mind is also in pursuit of goodness. The
message of the Angels on Christmas night told us that only men with
good will would become God's friends. This good-will factor is so
important that it seems probable there is no such thing as intellectual
atheism. Reason is on God's side, not the Devil's; and to deny
His absolute is to affirm a competing absolute. But if there is no
intellectual atheism, there is a frequent atheism of the will, a
deliberate rejection of God. That is why the Psalmist places atheism
not in the mind but in the heart: "The fool has said in his heart,
there is no God." This primary requirement of good will holds not only
for those who are looking for Divine Truth but also for those who found
It and who still make little progress spiritually. God's Grace is never
wanting to those who long to cooperate with it. The will to be wealthy
makes men rich; the will to be Christ's makes men Christians.
The second important prerequisite for coming to God in the
domain of
the will is living up to the demands of Divine Truth as we presently
see it. A sculptor could have an idea for a statue in his head for
years, but the idea would gradually fade and disappear if he did not
finally work it out in stone; so a man could have a particular
Christian truth in his head for a lifetime, but unless he put it into
practice, he might never be given another larger truth. Many of us know
a great deal about God, but few of us realize that knowledge in our
lives. Those who do, become all they ought to be. They know the Truth
in
their hearts—a different thing from knowing it as
a blackboard
demonstration. There is no longer a partition in them separating
intellectual truth from action. Some professors and knowledgeable men
know the proofs of the existence of God and the dogmas of the Church,
yet never become men of God. The reason is that they have never acted
on that knowledge. Since they never dynamized the degree of Truth they
knew, they were given no more; the knowledge they refused to fertilize
by action remained sterile. The corn that is kept in the cribs too long
will rot. To such unproductive souls, the Saviour orders: "Take the
talents away." (Matt. 25:28.) But the simple soul, living up to the
moral implications of the knowledge he possesses, is given new
knowledge, and finally his wisdom surpasses that of the intellectuals.
Our Blessed Lord went so far as to thank His Heavenly Father that He
hid His Truths from the intelligentsia of His day and revealed them to
the little ones, who would live by them. A simple girl like Catherine
of Alexandria confounded learned professors with the wisdom given her
by God, because she had won to a practical understanding of Divine
Truth. When we climb a hill, a new vista is opened, which was hidden
from the valley below. If, then, we rest passively on that hill, no new
perspective will ever be revealed; but if we act on the knowledge
received, walk to the end of the vista, then we shall discover that
still new horizons open to the eyes and mind.
Christianity is founded on the historical fact: "The Word became
Flesh." Wisdom became incarnate; God became man. Thus,
knowledge passes into act; oughtness becomes isness, and theory
becomes practice. Our Lord not only gave the Truth. "For if you will
forgive men "their offenses" (Matt. 6:14), but from the Cross. He acted on it: 'Father, forgive
them, for they know not what they do.'
(Luke 23:34.) He pleaded with His followers to become like little
children, but only after He Himself had become a child and been wrapped
in swaddling clothes. He not only taught the theory that the greatest
of all His followers should be the least, but He washed the feet of His
Own disciples in demonstration. His hearers,
too, were asked to become doers, because He said: "I have given you an
example." (John 13:15.) The order, runs: first the Word, and then the
Incarnation. This was reversed by Goethe, who gave the modern
an an escape from all moral obligation by saying, "In the
beginning was the Deed"—first, you live; and then you rationalize your
life. First you act; then you think a way to justify your action. First
you seize property; then you write
a law to sanction the theft. From this
false primacy of the act over
Truth comes all the moral disorder of the present day, as men no longer
fit their lives to a creed, but choose a creed to suit the way they
live.
The truths of the Church are not abstract truths like the
truths of
science, which are impersonal and a-ethical. Same escapist minds take
refuge in the use of scientific truths as a basis for ordering their
lives for precisely this reason. Psychological statements about man
rarely demand moral amendment; they permit us to retain mere interested
spectators of our own reality. Divine Truth, on the contrary,
involves me uniquely, and
with an urgency that is at first
frightening; it even demands
separation from the world. The full Truth
permits no easy compromise on this point. There are a thousand
other
religions attitudes one can take without provoking the enmity of the
spirit of the world, but that is because the spirit of the world
recognizes that, following these sects, one is
still identical with it. Our Lord gave the test whether we were His:
were we hated by the world? "I have taken you out of the world,
therefore,
the world will hate you." (John 17:14.) It is, therefore, not enough
for us
to read and study about Christianity, for Divine Truth is not such
abstract truth as a theorem in geometry. It will do us no good to know
theology if all the while pride, sensuality, and selfishness are
allowed the
license and their anarchy in our lives. In that case, we may possess a
knowledge of the love of God for us, we have no love of Him. Love
is meant to be reciprocal.
The moral preparation for the Faith or for making Divine Truth dynamic
in
us is as important as the intellectual; both kinds of readying should
go
together, the Wisdom and the Love of God, the Son and the Holy Spirit
are
equal in the Trinity. If the reason is neglected, a different sort of
error follows. Those whom the moral development outstrips the
intellectual generally end in a religion that is negative, critical,
and
pharisaical, or else in. a vague, emotional piety without content—as
those who have intellectual without no growth become skeptics, cynics,
and doubters. We can never love until we know; but once we love, then
it
can increase knowledge: "If any one love Me, he will keep My word, and
My
Father will love him, and We will come to him, and will make our abode
with him." (John 14:23.)
Many people like to discuss religion, to argue about it, but as if it
were impersonal, as if they were discussing Indonesian ritual dances.
They miss the many-splendored thing because they never relate what they
know to their own lives. A perfect example of this escape is to be
found in
the Gospel story of the woman at the well. The woman came to draw
water, and Our Lord asked her for a drink. But when He tried to
spiritualize the idea, thirst, to make her yearn to satisfy the thirst
of her soul with the waters of everlasting life, she thought the waters
He offered were something to be enjoyed and discussed, like
poetry—that they carried no moral obligation. To jolt her out of such
impersonality, the Saviour said: "Go, call thy husband, and come
hither." (John 4:16.) As God, He knew the smallest detail of her life;
and she knew, now, that her moral failings were in question. To avoid
exposure, she answered: "I have no husband." (John 4:17.) Jesus told
her: "Thou hast said well: I have no husband: For thou hast had five
husbands: and he whom thou hast now is not thy husband. This thou
hast said truly." (John 4:17-18.) This, to the woman conscious of her
adultery, seemed an intrusion into her private life; she did have many
marriages and divorces, it is true, but why need He bring that up?
Couldn't religion be discussed "in a civilized way," without allowing
it
to become personal? Like anyone caught in an embarrassing situation,
she changed the subject. She shifted the conversation away from her
guilty life back to the intellectual plane, changed it to the less
embarrassing topic of whether she should worship on the Samaritan hill
near by or in Jerusalem. That was her effort to escape the Saviour's
plea that she lay bare her sin—and it has been repeated a thousand
times since then. Bring the necessity
of repentance to a sinner and, nine times out of ten, he will shift the
subject to the impersonal,
will pretend that it is his reason which keeps him back, will choose a
safe topic with, "But what about the Decretals of Constantine?"
or some
such question.
The intellect does play its
role—but it is not until one has begun to
live right that one is able to reason well in this field. So long as
self-will and egotism refuse to surrender, the mind is used only to
justify the effort at escape. Until the resistance to reform is broken,
nothing can get into the soul—neither truth nor goodness. That is why,
when Our Lord was approached to settle an inheritance claim between two
brothers, He refused to settle the dispute: "Man, who hath appointed Me
Judge, or divider, over you?" (Luke 12:15.) He would not arbitrate
between two selfish claims—but He would
tell them how to avoid having
any dispute at all: "Take heed, and beware of all covetousness; for a
man's life doth not consist in the abundance of things which
possesseth." (Luke 12:15.) Here it was covetousnes: in the case of the
woman at the well, it was carnality—that kept the
questioners of Our Lord back from Divine
Truth. We do not know what happened to the brothers but we do know that
the woman at the well met the moral demands and later saluted the
Lord
as "Saviour of the World." (John 4:42.)
The final factor affecting assent to the Truth is our habit patterns.
These are the result of our
failure to act upon the moral
truths we already recognize (the second obstacle to belief described
above). Customs have won through, now, to a hegemony of their own. They
are so strong they can defy the weakened will. They stand as armed and
angry
guards at the gates to the intelligence and will let no truth past
which threatens them. When the Christian truth comes to any mind, it is
known according to the manner of the knower; and some knowers have a
vast
army of acts and habit patterns, prejudices and desires ready to war
upon
the Divine purpose of life. What the mind receives is received against
a
background which already forms a pattern of its own—and one will
reluctantly disarrange or change. In the face of Divine Truth, the
habit
patterns with their inferior motives arise to contest the high motive
driving the mind toward the True. Then one may say: "I fear to believe
because I will be ridiculed," or "Because my family will not like it,"
or "Because I will have to break with my companions and will make
enemies."
A struggle ensues between the intellectual comprehension of a Truth and
the habit patterns of inferior motives inherited from the
pre-Christian;
way of life. When a man stands off from religion and admires the
Truth from afar, he is full of praise of it and says: "If I became
religious, I would certainly join the Church." But the real crisis
begins
when the Truth is seen as personal—when admiration gives way, to
obligation, and when the Word becomes Flesh. The Divine Word, when He
became Flesh, suffered crises such as suffering, hunger, thirst,
contempt, the Cross—all as experienced facts: something of the same
kind
faces the mind that sees the Truth, and it shrinks back. Many souls
fear
to make Truth personal, intimate, or incarnate, because they know it
may
involve a Golgotha.
This is often the explanation of those escapists who want a religion
without a Cross or who call themselves gnostics in order to avoid the
moral consequences of Truth. Agnosticism, skepticism, and cultivated
doubt do not represent an intellectual position—for wherever there is a
shadow there must be light, and negation would not exist if there were
nothing to deny. These attitudes are rather a moral position, in which
a person attempts to make himself invulnerable to Divine Truth by
denying
its existence and turning his back on it, as Pilate did. It is not
doubts
that cause our loose behavior, as often as such behavior causes doubts.
Our Lord was extremely emphatic on this point: "Anyone who acts
shamefully hates the light, will not come into the light, for fear that
his doings will be found out. Whereas the man whose life is true comes
to
the light, so that his deeds may be seen for what they are, deeds done
in
God." (John 3:20.) "You pore over the scriptures, thinking to find
eternal
life in them (and indeed, it is of these I speak as bearing witness to
Me): but you will not come to Me to find life. I do not mean
that I look for honour from men, but that I can see you have no love of
God in your hearts." (John 5:39-42.) St. Paul reaffirms his Saviour:
"They
profess recognition of God, but their practice contradicts it; it is
they
who are abominable, who are disloyal, who are ill qualified for the
practice of any true virtue." (Titus 1:16.)
This, then, is the dynamic that under girds those with the lust of
power and the temerity to employ it unjustly if need be, who are
emboldened
in their actions and edicts. When joined to our willingness to forgive
and not retaliate, they feel no need to think twice or moderate their
intolerant hate-filled agenda in any way. To do less for them would be
to allow their feeling threatened by our merely believing in the mercy
and forgiveness of God as more than a threat, but the real possibility
they, too, might be converted, and this, folks is the heart of the
matter or the crux. They fear
the Cross more than they fear Christ Himself and or any one of His
followers. This is why Christ is banned at Christmas but Allah is not
banned at Ramadan. Down deep in their innards they know full well
that Christ is True God and True Man and thus they must insist on
dishonoring Him in order to maintain their own preferences for a chosen
lifestyle, and honor the false, non-existent god, who cannot possibly
be any real threat as long as they maintain power.
I encourage you all to read, print, and pass around Michael Matt's
tremendous article in THE REMNANT, links above. I, too, with him
emphatically plead [text in bold]:
Like Agnes, Sebastian, Barbara, Thomas
More, Father Kolbe and countless Catholics who lived during times of
persecution like these, we fight back by witnessing to the Truth in the
public square each and every day, while leaving the hateful rants and
clenched fists to those who know not what they do. We're up against
Principalities and Powers. At the end of the day, this is a spiritual
war between Christ and Anti-Christ.
The Christian mission is simple: frustrate the designs of the
haters of Jesus Christ by simply keeping the old Christian Faith.
Keep our eyes on Christ even as He carries a Cross to which we
ourselves may one day be nailed. Where's the justice in that? There is
none, just as there was none for Him the first time around.
But in the end the Immaculate Heart of Mary will triumph, the gates of
hell will never prevail, and Christ will be with us always, even unto
the consummation of the world. So we must help each other
“be not afraid” to keep the Faith, even in the face of gross injustice
and bloody persecution.
Can you do it? Can I? Let's pray for each other that our faith
will not fail us.
Amen.
To suffer so for our beloved Savior and King, Jesus Christ, is such a
privilege, that knowing that I am but a sinner, I cannot grasp how I
could possibly earn such an honor; surely it has nothing to do with my
merits,
and everything to do with His
infinite Mercy, which is above
all
His works!
ADDENDUM, APRIL 9:
It is understandable that some of you think that I may be going
too far to imply that the US Supreme Court may okay religious
discrimination against Catholics and Evangelicals, for instance.
Unfortunately the perspective of the "Supremes" has changed
dramatically, so much so that to say one is uncertain of justice is to
say a lot, indeed. But we do not even have to speculate for we have two
recent cases where the US Court refused to take up clear cut cases of
discrimination against Christians, and in one case, specifically
Catholics and the Catholic Church. Now, why this is indicative of a
possible preview of coming attractions is because that in order to take
on a case [Certiorari in
legalese] only 4 of the 9 justices have to agree.
Remember there are supposedly 4 originalist justices who claim to
uphold the Constitution as its founders intended. When a plaintiff
cannot get a hearing before the Court because less than 4 justices
would certify a case as having merit, leaving a lower court to ratify
injustice because of its own liberal bias, this tells us something
quite ominous. I mean to say that at least one of the 4 "origionalists"
isn't in reality.
Now for these two cases. The first involved a New York state government
elementary school where the Muslim religion was given preferential
treatment and Christians were not accorded the same --- equal ---
standing. On its face a farce and by any measure base and gross
discrimination by a government entity, not a private organization. A
lower court, when the case was brought before it by the Christian
plaintiffs, sided with the government school. So the plaintiffs sought
to have the US Supreme Court hear their case. It was denied. There were
not 4 justices willing to hear this case, so in New York state, at
least, if a public school wants to discriminate against Christians,
and or Catholics, according to the Court, this is okay with them, by definition. I
forget now, the year this occurred, but it was in the last decade or
so, not really so long ago, history-wise.
The second case is a most unusual one at that. In 2006 the city
of San Francisco, California, issued a resolution in which inflammatory
language, designed to denigrate and arouse hatred of the Vatican was
joined by a call by the city to its citizens and anyone else within the
sound of its voice to disregard and or disobey Church teachings. The
Church was branded by San Francisco as a hate group, similar to the
Southern Poverty Law Center's constant diatribes. The SPLC works
closely with the US Government ever since the Obama regime began its
behemoth monstrosity pretending to be ordered liberty.
The ultra leftist Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that San
Francisco, named after Saint Francis of Assisi, of all things, was in
its "rights" to issue such an ordinance and refused to restore equal
rights to Catholics in that city who had been officially proclaimed as
less than equal citizens by virtue of the vitriol the city felt free to
issue in such a threatening manner. The case was again denied by the US
Court a la the New York case.
So, when I state that I am not certain about the possibility that
Catholics can ever get a fair hearing in the current political
atmosphere, I am not using hyperbole to make a point, I am speaking
literally and as honestly as I know how. I did not say what the US
Court would or would not do, I said I did not know in so many words,
and neither do any of you, to be frank.
ADDENDUM APRIL 11:
A Colorado Sheriff's deputy reported that they are being encouraged to
view Christians with a wary eye. This was revealed by the Global
Dispatch and Glenn Beck's BLAZE TV. Christians are more and more being
viewed as a possible threat to the regime and the agenda of their
allies.
Apparently some Protestant family organizations are under some scrutiny
because they uphold the natural law on marriage and family.
I tell you this, my brothers and sisters, that soon it will not be safe
for anyone of us who are faithful to the Word of God and the teachings
of His Church, the Catholic Church. If the government insists that
Catholics must pay for contraception they do not want or use, then why
can it not further insist that Catholic priests must marry same-sex
"couples"? Are not these two forbidden practices, which are grave sins,
actually, not equivalently considered by the government as matters of
so-called "rights"?
CORRECTION APRIL 12:
I inadvertently transposed the web site: http://persecutionreport.org/
for the title of the book, which should have read,
PERSECUTED, not Persecution. I apologize to the authors and to you. The
web site is updated all the time so that those who have reports to
provide or want the latest information can access it. I have put a link
on our main-index page as well.
MAIN
INDEX --------------------
E-MAIL
www.catholictradition.org/persecution.htm