And in a Humble Manger December 21, 2007
"And it came to pass, that when they were there, her days were
accomplished, that she should be delivered. And she brought forth her
firstborn [
1] Son, and wrapped Him up in swaddling
clothes, and laid Him in a manger; because there was no room for them
in the inn. And there were in the same country shepherds watching, and
keeping the night watches over their flock. And behold an Angel of the
Lord stood by them, and the
brightness of God shone round about them; and they feared with a great
fear. And the Angel said to them: Fear not; for, behold, I bring you
good tidings of great joy, that shall be to all the people:
"For, this day, is born to you a Saviour, Who is Christ the Lord, in
the city of David. And this shall be a sign unto you. You shall find
the Infant wrapped in swaddling clothes, and laid in a manger. And
suddenly there was with the Angel a multitude of the heavenly army,
praising God, and saying: Glory to God in the highest; and on earth
peace to men of good will. And
it came to pass, after the Angels departed from them into Heaven, the
shepherds said one to another: Let us go over to Bethlehem,
and let us see this word that is come to pass, which the Lord hath
shewed to us.
"And they came with haste; and they found Mary and Joseph, and the
Infant lying in the manger. And seeing, they understood of the word
that had been spoken to them concerning this Child. And all that heard,
wondered; and at those things that were told them by the
shepherds. But Mary kept all these words, pondering them in her
heart. And
the shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God, for all the things
they had heard and seen, as it was told unto them." [St. Luke 2:7-20]
This is the more complete account of the first Christmas, the other
being in St. Matthew's Gospel. We are struck by the simplicity of the
scene, its utter humility, contentment, peace and joy, the perfection
of
Love Himself Who consented to be born of human nature in so lowly a
place, the King of kings born to the Queen of queens and not with the
fanfare of men but that of the Angels. To those who
think like the world thinks and judges all things accordingly, the
manger scene is one of incongruity and even implausibility. To see the
first Christmas as it truly was and is one needs to see with the eyes
of faith, or the desire for it, which is a gift from God, a response to
grace. The shepherds had it, and the Magi,
too. Apparently not, the current Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury who
scoffs at the Nativity scene. Not even Herod scoffed,
although he had not the gift of faith, for he worried exceedingly about
the Little King Who might rival his power and thus instructed the Three
Kings to report to him what they found as they journeyed East. [Thanks
to the Providence of God, they avoided his environs on their way back
to their kingdoms.] The Magi had consulted with Herod originally
because there was no public proclamation of this momentous event
that would forever change the world men had known since the fall in
Eden.
While all the Mysteries of the Holy Rosary are beautiful and truly the
"School of Mary", of the Joyful Mysteries it is the third, the
Nativity, on which one lingers longest, indeed, those ten Hail Marys
pass all
together too quickly, for one
wants to remain at the foot of the manger---as Mary did there as she
would later at the Foot of the Cross---the first sacrifice of
Christ, so to speak. Now the two Gospels, that of Matthew and Luke, do
not speak of the animals that enclosed the manger with warmth, but
through tradition we
believe that, since it was a place where shepherds and country folks
sheltered with their animals, it is natural and a part of God's plan
for
them to be present at the manger as they were and as signposts of the
Passion and the Resurrection and what came after.
Consider the donkey, who so lovingly and carefully bore Mary to her
visit to Saint Elizabeth for the birth of St. John the Baptist, then on
the arduous trek to Bethlehem, heavy with Child, and later them both on
the flight into Egypt under command of an Angel: It would be the donkey
who would bear the Savior into Jerusalem on Palm Sunday, triumphant as
a King, before His Passion and Crucifixion. Perhaps, through the
Providence of God, the same donkey?
Consider the oxen, beasts of burden who are bound to the yoke: Christ
would later call all men unto Him into His loving Sacred Heart, to
bind themselves to Him, with the words, "For My yoke is sweet and My
burden light." [St. Matthew 11:30]
Later [on page 2] we will look again at the oxen.
Consider the sheep and the little lambs: Jesus told His disciples that
He was the Good Shepherd, Who knows His sheep and His sheep know Him,
including: "And other sheep I have, that are not of this fold: them
also I must bring, and they shall hear My voice, and there shall be one
fold and one Shepherd." [St. John 10:16]
The figure of the lamb or the sheep is perhaps the most familiar one of
all in Scripture. The Apostles, in particular St. Peter, as the first
Pontiff, were to feed His lambs or sheep with the His teachings and the
Sacraments He entrusted to them, they too, being shepherds. But it is
the little lamb, the one so often depicted in Nativity scenes that is
the most poignant for it is the Savior Himself, Who is not only
Shepherd but the Lamb, the Agnus Dei, the sacrificed Lamb of God, both
Victim and High Priest, both Lamb and Shepherd.
Oh yes, the Mystery of the Holy Nativity is very rich, indeed, beyond
our ability to plumb all its depths. As numerous as the stars in the
sky of Bethlehem, as numerous as the Angels singing in chorus and
adoring the newborn King of Angels, as many as these are the vast
innumerable riches of the poor manger ...
We must not intrude on this holy scene, this "Heaven on earth" by
bringing in the unseemingly profane modernity, although the purpose of
this
column is one of contrast to ponder. In order to avoid any undue
incursion or spoliation, the column is deliberately concluded below.
John 2
14 And He found in the temple them that sold oxen and sheep and doves,
and the changers of money sitting.
15 And when He had made, as
it were, a scourge of little cords, He drove them all out of the
temple, the sheep also and the oxen, and the money of the changers He
poured out, and the tables He overthrew.
2 Corinthians 6
14 Bear not the yoke with
unbelievers. For what participation hath justice with injustice? Or
what fellowship hath light with darkness?
Galatians 5
1 Stand fast, and be not held again under the yoke
of bondage. [reference to the slavery of sin, one sin of which is
injustice, the withholding of truth men require to live in dignity and
harmony with one another.]
Acts Of Apostles 15
28 For it hath seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to us, to lay no
further burden upon
you than these necessary things ... [reference to religious observance,
but good counsel in general regarding human nature and men's right to
justice under the natural law. Man is not owed charity as he is
justice, and while charity is the greatest of the three theological
virtues, the purpose of government, ecclesiastical and civil is
justice, not charity.]
..................
Taking in the unsightly bedlam of the anti-Bethlehem scene that is
modern politics, and public debate, one can only think that the above
image is too benign, for all its swift dispatch of evildoers, to
capture the profane, stupid, obscene cacophony before
us. Modern man, despite his claim to "have faith" is spiritually blind,
politically inept at best and subject to that which is not only
unbecoming persons created in the image of God, but completely
incongruous. This segment of the column could be subtitled, "How come?"
in sharp contrast to that first Christmas and most historic of historic
events, for the Church teaches us why the Incarnation of Christ.
Christmas in secular America otherwise known and hailed as "the holiday
season", ought to be renamed the "silly mean season", courtesy of the
rampant secularists with power who despise Christ. In the year of 2007,
it is rendered
even more so by the presidential election of 2008, thus it is more
accurately called the perennial season of hubris, hype, and hypocrisy.
Note,
the party affiliation is not mentioned because there is only one party
in America, the party of the establishment, big government handouts,
largesse with other people's money, the new world order, a la "Foreign
Affairs" articles written by one of the candidates, as
much abortion as can be gotten away with, and the nanny PC state in one
form or another, preferably both in some quarters. Until Christ reigns
in enough hearts, truly reigns, America is flirting with national
dissolution and moral, social suicide. Our judas goats have enslaved us
poor oxen bound ever and ever more tightly to a burdensome yoke
unworthy of a people if they still possessed the use of reason. We can
choose to have an abortion, women can "make the right decision" but no
one can decide for themselves or not if they want to smoke in their own
home while alone, in many jurisdictions, or what their children eat for
lunch at school. Imagine! One of the candidates is seeking to establish
by law universal Pre-K indoctrination for all children in the USA. Of
course the age of the so-called Pre-K will be moved further and further
back until "no child is left behind" in his mother's arms, that is.
Consider first and foremost the audacious egos involved: consider
another Christmas over two hundred years ago, when a small band of
revolutionaries, outnumbered but
not out won, led by General George Washington, crossed the frigid
Delaware River, where the Hessian mercenaries were encamped. You and I
may not have joined the American rebels as the
violence that was used to stir up the masses was more violent and
unjust than that of the supposed British rule, but we can marvel at the
humility of Washington, who was so courageous against all odds. When
the American republic was established a President was needed. The
colonial representatives selected him by popular acclamation, not the
least of which were some of his favorable attributes: honesty,
simplicity, and humility. He did not seek the highest office in the
land; no, in fact, he shunned all such conceit. He had to be convinced
and in the end he relented out of a sense of duty, not ambition.
Only a humble man is open to the grace of God; I am morally certain
that George Washington, once a Freemason, of whom it is said he
converted to the true faith, also kept an image of the Mediatrix of all
graces on his bedroom wall.
Consider the enormity and boldness of such egos that think they are
fit
not only to be President, but that they are better than their
opponents, and are willing to spend the millions and millions that
could be used to help those they say they want to help, to convince the
voters how worthy they are for such office where they will assist the
ultra liberal unconstitutionally bent Congress to match what they spent
getting elected and then some. Evolutionists and those who think they
can peacefully coexist with them also believe that money
grows on trees.
Consider the megalomania
that has seized one American family,
whose husband served two terms and now is in the thick of things,
managing his wife's campaign for President, so that once more we can
have "two for one" as if the first round wasn't sufficient to reveal
how corrupt and or naive the electorate are and how shame itself has
lost all meaning along with the verb "is". Consider that while claiming
to be for reducing taxes on the "middle class"---this is also the year
that our candidates
have "gotten religion", in more ways than one, the first being the
recognition that the middle class, the burdened oxen that make the
water wheels revolve, has been selected for
extermination---this same candidate makes no such claim in re
the upper classes, yet has her and her husband's substantial millions
safely out of reach of the IRS in the banks of the Cayman Islands.
Consider that
she, taking cynical advantage of the "gotten religion movement", has
put out a commercial with a Christmas tree, sans nativity, in the
background while she
places the finishing touches on gaily wrapped packages, labeled with
the various aspects of socialism, which means higher taxes, period.
Conceit, and deceit. And not one word about the reason for the season,
the Babe in Bethlehem. How come?
This is the same candidate who is known to permit money to be handed
out at key intervals to the populace while campaigning. In my day we
used to call this "buying an election" or just plain graft. Now it is
merely "handing out money", perfected to an art form by the Kennedy
machine in an earlier era.
Consider the ego that resides in a man who has barely served part of a
first Senate term, that he is qualified to be President, given the
exigencies of modern warfare. Consider that
having joined the religion bandwagon, he says he joined a such and such
Protestant church. The reason? He was attracted to its social mores and
its action work. Not one word about being a Christian because he
believes in Christ the Savior. Not to be left in the dust, he, too, has
a
"Christmas" commercial, all sweet and charming with a Christmas tree in
the background, sans nativity, of course, that would be just too
religious, with sentiments of gratitude and the like. Does he wish the
viewer and voter a Merry Christmas? No, he requires plausible
deniability to hedge his bets. He has a little surrogate say it for him
to cover one of the bases, his young daughter, with the other one
piping
up "Happy Holidays" to cover the rest. Right. How come?
Consider a third candidate who has more guts: he does not pretend to be
a Christmas card commercial. he merely sits before a winter scene, like
all too many of the Christmas cards we received this year from
practicing
Christians, and talks of more class warfare and socialism. He wants to
be Kris Kringle dressed up like Uncle Sam who wants us, our money that
is. He is at
least consistent. Yet he made his fortune using the American system of
injustice, the corporate way, the very system he now declaims.
Hypocrisy. He would deny others the chance to do as he did, if he had
his way, by demand or usurpation. Golly gee! To use one expression from
his home locale. How come?
Not that I am an unabashed
devotee of corporate America that has sold us down the river of
extinction to the Red Chinese for a meager 30 billion pieces of
poisoned profit.
Consider a certain Huckster,
a
former Baptist preacher who envisions for himself a messianic role as
do-gooder that is, a reconstructed socialist for higher taxes, for just
one example, in the White House. As an avowed Christian he says he does
not hold with evolution but thinks it is fine in the textbooks of the
government schools. How come?
A brief digression here. It is not up to a President to dictate
school
texts, but this is beside the point, one is speaking of his opinion as
to what rightly belongs there. He wants it both ways. If an
interview with the affable Larry King on CNN can cause him to stumble
so easily how will he deal with the other messianic personalities in
the Third World and reconstructed Communist China who do not claim to
be Christian?
Hucksteree is not for "gay marriage" but approves of the US Supreme
Court decision [Lawrence] that in so many words guarantees that later,
if not sooner we will have "gay marriage" or have a heck of a
fight on our hands to outlaw it, piecemeal, with a war of attrition
that
bodes well for the degenerate among us. How come?
With this candidate there are so many How come? moments there is not
enough space to list them all. One more shall suffice and it is a
beaut! The hopeful Huckster-in-chief is making a campaign stop at a big
anti-Catholic watering hole headed by the notorious Rev. Hagee who
fulminates
against the Catholic Church as the Beast in the Apocalypse and the Pope
as the Antichrist. If he is for "all the people" as he says, why has he
written off well informed Catholics? How come?
Does he know that anti-Catholic bigotry is socially acceptable,
especially since so many "Catholics" practice it themselves?
Consider another well heeled candidate who has had an eleventh hour
conversion on abortion, better late than never, and I believe him.
Well, how come he is for experimentation on live embryos who are tiny
human beings, which he acknowledges they are? How come????
I mean if a person is a person, isn't he always a person and deserving
of the equal protection of the law? The sanctity of life is so basic
and uncomplicated that only mush heads can botch it. If he is this
confused on the most basic of rights, what are we to think of his
ability to judge rightly elsewhere?
Consider the Catholic candidate, "America's mayor" who wants to reduce
abortions but went on his own cognition and of his own free will,
before Planned
Parenthood and said he was on their side, in so many damning words. How
come? Consider this man who cannot be true to his marriage vows or his
Baptismal promises, much more sacred than that of the US Constitution,
how should we trust him when he says he wants justices that are strict
constructionists? How come he dares to state this with such vehemence
in his fruitcake filled Christmas commercial, cum tree, cum red
sweater, sans nativity?
Could it just be that he knows all too well that the left-controlled
Senate will not confirm such a justice? And that he hopes we will
forget the
other drop of the shoe, so to speak? To ask is to answer.
And on and on it goes and where it will stop nobody knows; all we know
is
that the down sized Huck, our Puck the clown of a thousand faces is the
Pied Piper, so much so
that one of the others above felt compelled to hold a press conference
to
explain his Mormon religion, that is, that he believes it and will not
back down, to the nation. To his credit he is resolute while in error
as to the true faith. Contrast this with a previous era, the one known
as Camelot. King Arthur John turned out to be a latter day Lancelot as
we discovered when he delivered
that shame filled speech to a southern rogue's gallery of heretics and
bigots promising them that
Roman Catholicism would have no affect on him. He then proceeded to
prove it with precision once seated in power. The unbelievably
pig-headed media honchos were
comparing the two men as equals. What a spectacle! The powers that
be abroad must be laughing all the way to the proverbial bank. I would
have said the enemy, but we have met the enemy and it is us . . . we
all need
the first Christmas as it really was, not how we imagine it to be, now
more then ever.
1. "Her firstborn"... The meaning is, not that she
had afterward
any other child; but it is a way of speech among the Hebrews, to call
them also the firstborn, who are the only children. See annotation
Matt. 1. 25.
OF SOUND, FLURRY, AND OTHER USELESS THINGS:
ROE V. WADE A GENERATION LATER January 21, 2008
Today marks the 35th
anniversary of that Day of Infamy when
the US Supreme Court betrayed our one nation [under God] and its soul,
the natural law and Divine law, in its hubris of issuing preferential
policy from the bench in contradiction to the purpose of the Court,
which
is safeguarding and interpreting [
1] the law,
especially the natural law,
the bulwark against tyranny and injustice, not redefining law and thus
making it---sanctioning
the wholesale slaughter of millions of tiny babies in the womb: the
stripping of the natural, inviolable right from the most vulnerable in
favor of an usurped, false and unnatural right by the more powerful,
whose rights by reason are limited because human persons who have
reached the age of reason also have responsibilities to their God,
their neighbor and to their country. Beyond obscene! The very
definition of savagery.
Thirty-five years! Who could ever have imagined such a thing? Our one
nation under God is now irrevocably many, fractured into various
competing ideologies, some ruled by God, others ruled by the
Prince of this World and those who do his bidding, often unawares. And
still the monotonous cadence goes on, hum-drum day after hum-drum day,
with its
eternal companion, American "optimism" enticing the power brokers and
polity alike onward towards Mammon and from the Day of Infamy to an
ever approaching Day of Reckoning, if I may be presumptuous enough to
borrow the title of Pat Buchanan's latest book. Who am I to attempt to
improve on perfection?
When
a nation has the temerity to turn its back on the natural law [only 22%
of the public favors overturning Roe] and
its beloved, the rule of reason, both will follow one another into
exile, and then
meaninglessness takes over, the
tedious useless meaningless oppression of the tyranny of the
politically correct
and then
some. Words become but sound and flurry, and yes, fury, too, but they
mean what the Mad Hatter wants them to mean in the new Wonderland of
the disunited state [s] of America. Traditionally words intrinsically
meant something
because language is a gift from God so that we may communicate reality,
maintain normalcy, raise the young,
assist the common good, offer God proper communal worship and save our
souls.
Language itself has always been part of a culture or society's
tradition. Without tradition in language itself, a common meaning
comporting with reason, that
endures, a culture can no longer impart its ideals
to the next generation, no longer sustain itself; it will have to
abandon its ideals, its very purpose to sustain the breach. [
2] Language
has always
served as the means for identifying these, and ultimately truth itself,
without which we surrender our human dignity to the inhuman and
depraved. To alter the language to abrogate what we think about human
nature is cultural, spiritual suicide. America
ought to learn from the mistake of the Catholic Church which foolishly
allowed experimentation with the language of its liturgy so that now we
have a Church of diverse beliefs all claiming to be Catholic, utterly
absurd and meaningless, effectively the courtship of despair while
tempting the Holy Spirit. Beyond blasphemy and idolatry!
Animals, who may be wild although not depraved, do not have
language, but they correspond to their created purpose in
their communicating with one another and even with us. [
3]
Man requires
language either spoken or tacit, but that language must correspond to
what actually is, our nature as created by God, not what we prefer
things to be or we descend not only lower than the animals who have not
corrupted their nature, but into hell on earth itself. Gulags and
assorted horrors [
4] may have their own logic, when
the illogical is the
norm:
A preborn baby is a human being in some states and in others he is
not, instead merely "potential" human life. Note, not a human person
with potential.
What a world of difference and not so subtle as one might think at
first glance. By rearranging a sentence structure we have altered
"reality" and are transmitting a new meaning to connote who and what is
a human
person, thanks to the Sandra Day O'Connors amongst us, who are legion.
Only God can do this, yet, He does not do this because He does
not violate truth as He is Truth itself. Our hubris and conceit defies
description, matching only our self-deceit!
In the same states where he is a human being before birth it is usually
recognized as such only when
someone not hired by the mother has killed him. He loses his human
rights and his personhood
if she decides to
kill him herself or contract with another to do it for her.
Irrationality at its lethal worse. And where are the protests demanding
impeachment and recall of public officials who inspire such debauchery
and plot to
redefine legalities so as to maintain this facade of the rule of law?
In
the
major social and political quarters? The rising up of a people imbued
with reason against this delusion, this fraud? If our language had not
been violated we would recognize the monster immediately. It ought to
be against
the law to dissemble so
outrageously and boldly! The court [in]justices who so uphold this
infamy
surely should be removed, if for no other reason than they have lost
the use of reason and are unqualified to sit on the bench! [
5]
Any
bench in
any jurisdiction! Superior or inferior! Imagine this! You might be a
person
who cannot be murdered without legal redress by society on your behalf,
depending on what state you were conceived in and then, based solely on
who does
the killing and or and who hires him. Would we allow this in any other
case of
injustice? The media and pundits would have a field day and the common
citizen would be up in arms, so to speak! Other crimes involve
commodities or property or contracts or false promises. These generally
still hold. No demand for a
change in the law to correspond with reality, that of a human being
whose life itself is threatened! Most baby animals receive more
protection from the law! In Maine it is against the law to destroy the
turtle eggs of at least one species, but later term abortions are still
being done, let alone all the other abortions! If turtle eggs are
recognized as belonging to turtledom why is it that we cannot recognize
the humanity of the child in the womb? Why isn't he on the
endangered list? Each human being is uniquely precious because of his
human soul. I mean, how can a person be a human being one
second and not a human being the next, just because someone has
rearranged the language to cover the dark deeds men cannot do in the
pristine light of day? He can't, so we pretend to lie to ourselves. Oh!
the mighty, terrifying last judgment upon the whole world, especially a
country with so much vaunted freedoms. That, too will be a Day of
Reckoning, the Day of all Days.
Meanwhile
the 2008 candidates for President of this impious territorial land
hurry and scurry about from one breathless debate and engagement after
another, trying to win our favor with more nonsense. This is not to say
that any particular individual is not sincere, however misguided. That
is for God to judge. We are to use our reason to judge the situation at
hand in order to respond in accord with our dignity and
responsibilities to one another and to God Who created us.
One party consists of a gaggle of contenders more noisy than lucid:
they are vying with one another for the claim as the candidate most in
favor of the culture of death, under the ironic slogan of CHANGE!
Beyond gall and certainly beyond plain common sense. Of course the
change they want is economic, more socialism, for one thing, but they
are not for change when it comes to killing the innocent. One candidate
accused the
young upstart with rhetorical skill of not being as pro-abortion as
she, ironic indeed! Raymond Arroyo of EWTN had Terry Jefferies of CNS
as his guest two weeks running. Mr. Jefferies is a veritable
encyclopedia on the culture of death. It turns out that the "young
upstart" is not only not less pro-abortion than his seasoned rival
claimed, he makes her look almost pro-life by comparison. There are
lies, and statistics and damned lies. This case is an example of the
harmony of all three. The young Senator from Illinois is so rabidly,
fiercely for abortion rights that he even favors the wanton killing of
infants born after unsuccessful abortions. His opponent would not go
this far and yet she aspires to wear the revolting mantle of
baby-killer-in-chief. So now I guess, abortion also means post-abortion
if you are so luckless as to have been born in Illinois. Ah, the
language keeps morphing to keep up with our fury to become like unto
God without sanctifying ourselves. We are the "gods" that are failing.
Liberalism writ large and nasty.
In the other camp, the supposedly pro-life side, contenders vie with
each other to demonstrate how pro-life they have been in the past. Yup,
I believe every word they say because they actually believe it, still,
35 years and counting. One of the candidates wants a Human Life
amendment and good for him! How silly and boorish of me to ask
inconvenient questions such as, well after the Supreme Court knocks
that down into verbiage destined for the big delete key, thanks to
NARAL, the ACLU and NOW---now and forever---what then, Mr. old new deal
Republican? The loss of all reasoning power. The power to tax or not
tax, to spend or not spend, to go to war or not, the power to safeguard
the border or dissolve the nation, but powerless to
recognize reality when it counts most. Everything is backwards and thus
meaningless.
Where are the men and women with backbone who still possess the grace
of God enough to have use of their reason? They aren't running and they
would not win if they did because we are so blind and will get the
very President we most deserve. That Tuesday in November will be a Day
of Reckoning also, sealing the deal with idiocy.
What we need is a Congress which is willing and able to limit the
jurisdiction of the federal courts per
the US Constitution. Then let us talk amendments. I have no use for
politics anymore, an utter waste of money and time. Global warming? Oh
yes, from the hot fatuous air in Washington and those who want to serve
Mammon there.
EWTN, oh blessed EWTN was a most blessed balm this weekend, for its
pro-life army generals know what is what. From Arroyo and Jefferies the
weeks before, to
Father Tad Pacholczyk, Director of Education at the NCBC and
teacher par excellence of
the immorality of cloning and embryonic research and Monsignor Philip
J. Reilly, Founder of Helpers of God's Precious Infants. They know what
is at stake and of what the true culture war consists of and it is not
politics,
it is radical conversion, one person at a time. Change the culture and
the law will follow instead of what we have now, a changing culture to
match an unjust corrupted legal system. God bless EWTN and these men,
over and over again. I vote with my Rosary! and the power of the pen!
1. Interpreting the law does not consist
of rewriting it ideologically, or imposing a new meaning on it not
intended by the legislators, but interpreting whether it applies to a
particular case or if it corresponds with the Constitution as intended
by those who enacted it.
2. This is why we actually practice racism on a
grand social scale, while telling the people we are eliminating it, for
instance. One prominent black leader who is honest speaks often and
eloquently about the double standard on race, that Black Democrats get
a free pass and are free to be racist without the media challenging
their duplicity, while White Republicans are scrutinized for the
smallest faux pas in order to
find racism that may not even exist, in all likelihood does not exist.
We have redefined racism to such an extent it is inherently meaningless
except to be used as a cudgel by those in power to silence those who
aren't. We aren't even free to raise this objection without being
branded pariahs. The loss of freedom in order to expand it, total
irrationality.
3. Our home has a number of bird feeders in the
backyard, for various species. One, a gray and white bird that is not
described in our bird book, and thus I have not been able to identify,
seems to have quite some acumen. When its feeder is out of seed and we
have been busy elsewhere and not noticed, one of the flock comes to the
back porch window that forms part of the wall of our kitchen and taps
with his beak on the pane to get our attention. This has not been a
fluke either but happens, not frequently, but repeatedly still. Some of
the birds have learned in their own way that we are the source of their
food supply and must intuit on some level that we care and will
respond. They do not have intellects, at least as we define a mind, but
they do communicate. I have no other explanation for this species
knowing how and when to tap on the window. I am open to another
explanation as I am not an ornithologist.
4. Father Tad told his audience about all the
human beings in the embryonic stage of development who were created for
the purpose of being used in the laboratory, tiny human beings
suspended indefinitely who cannot grow and develop and know God and
have a family. This week the Pope had some strong words about the new
"life form" being permitted in England, part man, part animal. Words
fail to convey the pure evil.
5. In the case of the US Supreme Court, Justice
Antonin Scalia is on record as saying that the Court is not about
morality. And he is considered the best in many of an opinion! Ah, but
justice is all about morality. And when it comes to the abrogation of
the natural law, no court in the land has the right to do so. That is
what Nuremberg was about, putting the legal atrocities of the Nazis,
"crimes against humanity"---another way of saying that there is a
natural law that all men are bound by, that they can know by
reason---on trial. It is the very duty of justice to recognize this and
to declare null and void any law that contradicts the natural law,
period. This is why we have the concept of "jury nullification" in jury
trials: the right and duty of the jury to declare a defendant has been
tried under an inherently unjust law, one that does not comport with
common sense and human reason, and that because the law itself violates
this aspect of the natural law, it is abrogating it by way of setting
the defendant free. Of course this principle can be misused just as
parental or papal authority can be misused, but this is a problem of
Original Sin, not the natural law and its corollaries which exist apart
from individual error in judgment. What is inherently moral and
obligatory does not cease to be because of a default of imperfect
persons, but rather serves to call us to do our best to rise to the
occasion, so to speak, calling us to be better than we are at the
moment, because as human beings, we are under the jurisdiction of that
law, simply by being human.
THE DYNAMICS OF FEAR:
IN THE DESERT
February 12, 2008
This column is about the
crisis of faith that is a large portion of the scourge of modern
society, and how it affects those of us who interact here on the web.
It is lengthy and I apologize. I
am speaking only for myself and not for any other web master or writer.
Those of you who read my Declaration and Disclaimer with Update
regarding the posting of material from irregular sources, specifically
some sedevacantist groups, know that I sometimes do so after careful
consideration. These articles and or devotions have nothing to do with
the canonical positions of those associations, nor are they ever
provided a forum to evangelize for their cause. Any material I may use
always has a previous source and is in fact, distributed by the
sedevacantists as edifying literature for Catholics, period, and is not
related otherwise. The sedevacantist organizations did not originate
the material themselves. For instance, a holy card with a novena to a
Saint, an article based on the life of a Saint and so forth. All
wholesome or if concerning social issues, strictly unrelated directly
with any particular group and its positions on the Papacy. In other
words, I do not act as a conduit for sedevacantism. I do not provide
links to their web sites, etc. But being honest, if ever I use such
material, which is extremely rare, because most of the same
material is available from other Catholic vendors and or libraries, I
always cite the source, for documentation and basic courtesy and also a
necessity, for
reliability, and the like. You have a right to know and I have an
obligation to oblige, hence the noun, obligation.
Recently I posted a few articles from a Canadian [Quebec] order which
is sedevacantist and I used the above criteria. Since I am so busy with
this web site I do not surf every day on the web and was unaware that
this group is more than just sedevacantist or not recognizing that Pope
Benedict XVI is the Pontiff---it ordains women, has its own "pope"
and is in legal difficulties because of the charges of child abuse and
kidnapping along with torture as I understand it. Until I became
convinced of this group's perfidy to the natural law, not just a group
of people who are confused and disoriented because of the crisis in the
Church, but real criminality, I could no longer even have their name on
this site, period!! So I removed those recently uploaded pages
immediately. I am most grateful to those who alerted me to the danger
and the possibility of scandal.
While I was on the topic I included related matters that arise here at
CT from time to time: visitors make requests to have certain links and
or materials posted or ask for changes, which I will not reiterate
here. I explained why it is not always possible to grant a request.
Some of the requests are more like demands with the threat of their
personal censure or condemnation, that I am not a "true Catholic" or
are being unreasonable. Most requests or suggestions are offered very
nicely, kindly. It is I who will answer to God for what I have
done with this web site as it is He Who provides and permits me to do
this. I take my responsibility very very seriously and it weighs like a
heavy burden, a joyful one most of the time, as I pray as I work and
look forward to hearing from almost everyone who writes, but a grave
task to
undertake because it is His work and not mine, Our Lady's work, not
mine. This site was begun in reparation and in response to a small
crisis in a small parish in a small diocese and on a wing and a prayer,
actually a gift from God seemingly out of nowhere. I will tell you how
this enterprise all began in a moment.
But first, I have to apologize to anyone who may have misunderstood
that declaration. I was trying to explain that some people are angry
when they write in. I am not angry,
because I understand why, which I will also write about below, the
title of this column is in reference to that. It
occurred to me that you perhaps will feel reluctant to write in
requests, ask for changes, etc., and this pains me because I respect
your opinions, even if the practicality is not possible because more
people want the opposite where only one aspect can be obtained at any
one time or on any one page. Please, do feel free to write about
anything, anytime. Some of you preface your remarks with an apology
that you regret to be bothering me. You are not a bother, even the
angry ones. I care
about your concerns and I care about you. This web site is not about
me, but about us and
our eternal salvation and our citizenship in society as the salt of the
earth. The Holy Father says we have to evangelize and we must. I may be
the one
who has to make the decisions in order to have some coherent order and
purpose but this web site is for all you out there, the moms and dads,
the grandparents, the teachers, the other writers, priests, nuns, and a
bishop here and there, from Canada, Australia, the UK, South America,
Russia, Taiwan, India, Sweden, Poland, not just the USA, to name a few
countries [from many] and or continents. AND IT IS NOT ABOUT ME BEING
RIGHT AND YOU BEING WRONG. IT IS ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO PLEASE
EVERYONE ALL THE TIME. I appreciate your patience and
understanding because I cannot post alternate web sites in Polish,
Spanish and other languages, just one such type request we receive
regularly. Never think that you "are a bother", never. Even when I
cannot comply with a request, I am so happy you asked anyway. My
favorite request is for prayer, favorite in that I can do this without
having to change something that will displease others, and that prayer
is the key to everything in this life in preparation for eternity. Your
needs are heart-filled and urgent and I always pray for you when you
ask; sometimes I get overwhelmed with work and forget to get back to
you, but know that I never forget, and should I do so out of fatigue,
my Guardian Angel has been instructed to remind me. He does but not
often because I seem to have the memory for remembering this request
above all others. I will forget to send something or to find an
address, but prayer requests are like ever-blooming flowers that
require watering, they beckon you toward them and their hungry roots.
Even feel free to express exasperation if you so need to. Please write
and know that I really care, always.
Objective # 1 accomplished.
Item #2: How this web site was born:
Many years ago, too long ago to recall the exact year now, about 1991,
our little
parish decided to start a newsletter in addition to the Sunday
bulletin. Another parishioner and I were going to put it together by
gathering the material for it. Some of the items to be included were
local parish news, help needed, recipes, and so I thought, as this was
my
suggestion, devotions for each month. The first issue was slated for
November, the month of the Holy Souls in Purgatory. The pastor heard me
but he must have been distracted because he never said anything about
it. As the time came for the first printing and distribution he
realized that when I said the Holy Souls in Purgatory, I meant the Holy
Souls, and not
the New Orleans Saints---a sports team at the time. He balked and
nixed it, saying "we can't have these devotions." In a Catholic
newsletter. As we all know by now
Purgatory has been consigned to the same place where they hide the
Blessed Sacrament in some churches, to a back corner or side chapel,
out of sight, out of heart and mind. The new Limbo! The Novus Ordo
establishment still
prays for the dead but in ambiguous terms so that it is perfunctory,
and not urgent or an act of charity, an urgent charity, an ardent
charity. Most Catholics think of Heaven, period. If anyone is in Hell
it is dead Traditionalists, curmudgeons who reminded their consciences
that there is a crying need for apologists and were not ashamed to say
so.
Purgatory? No one really goes there anymore, like a vacant train
station. Everyone is on the fast track to Heaven it seems, just think
good thoughts and it will happen, hold hands at the Our Father and the
Holy Spirit will fly you there on the wings of an eagle with amazing
grace.
We ended up not doing the newsletter at all. It was still
November
and I had an old word processor in Word Perfect 5 setup, a forerunner
of today's standard computer. It ran on DOS, so that tells you how old
it was and I am. I scraped the
money together to purchase a secondhand photocopier with limited
warranty and service and published the newsletter---several
pages---myself and
distributed the first month for free, 50 copies were all the paper and
toner I could afford. The next month requests came in and I did 100 and
charged a small fee to cover expenses, no profit intended or desired.
Then I received more requests and that doubled and then that doubled.
After a while I needed help and a volunteer with another machine. We
cranked along for two years and had subscribers in other states and
even abroad, still small in circulation but filling a need, a desperate
need for Catholic Tradition and truth and the traditional devotions.
Most of us had no indult Traditional Mass as yet back then. Meanwhile
postage
was rising and the old machines needed constant repair beyond our
ability to afford it. It was Mother's Day coming up and my dear
husband,
surely chosen by God Himself for my spouse, came home with a gift, a
real computer. Two other men, neither Catholic, but oh so good of heart
helped me, one who taught me how to use a computer, make a basic web
page, how to upload to a web site, and
the other, a service provider, gave me extra space beyond what I could
afford. Please pray that they receive the gift of faith. Although this
gift is gratuitous from God, I think they more than earned it. Catholic
Tradition was up and running, without its own domain
name as yet. I was so inexperienced I did not even know what a domain
name was. That would come later. After I learned how to do a simple
page
without the bells and whistles, I learned graphics, self-taught. Then I
began amassing an even bigger library of art and Catholic classics and
prayer books. The rest is history. That pastor will never know what he
actually accomplished when he said no to those precious Saints in
waiting, the Holy Souls. I think they are praying for CT and for him;
they cannot
pray for themselves. And the pastor? I pray for him every single day,
every day. Nothing was lost and everything was gained! At the same time
holy images were in such a state of destruction or sacrilege through
deliberately evil art, that I realized that there was a need for
reparation
for this sin not just all our own sins, as well as the sins of the
clergy who vilified Tradition and the holocaust of abortion. That same
priest railed against the Traditional Mass just a dream then. He said,
"I hate that Mass." His precise words, I can never forget them. The
purpose of the site would
be two-fold, maintaining alive the traditions of Tradition and
reparation. This is agenda
memoranda #2 concluded.
Point #3
THE DYNAMICS OF FEAR:
IN THE DESERT
As I said I am not angry with those of you who are angry. I know that
you do not mean to be angry with me, I am a convenient point to aim at.
And you have legitimate needs.
Things are also easier on the "net" because there is no face to face
contact, at least as yet in this corner of our space. I sound off here,
you need somewhere to go to do so also. This is okay, believe me I do
understand, even if you think you are being reasonable and that I am
not. This is okay, too.
Human psychology is not that complex and I do not subscribe to the
Freudian-Jungian theories and those other humanistic orientations. I
remain committed to the basics, that which is known by experience,
common sense, hard-won experience and that comport with Catholic
teaching on
the spiritual life of combat, sin, human pride, human respect,
self-deceit, our great
capacity for them, fear, pain, personal loss, death, grief, human
torpor and spiritual sloth, discouragement, hope and joy. It is really
this elementary although
neither simple nor easy.
Fear is one of those emotions and stimuli
that can be our best friend or worst enemy, just as our greatest
strength can become a weakness. If the devil cannot pull us "his way",
he changes course and pulls us "our way."
Essentially
we live in a climate of fear, whether we acknowledge it to
ourselves and each other or not, recognize it down deep or not. Fear of
the government [a sign of encroaching tyranny, not freedom], fear of a
crumbling institutional infrastructure and the outward kind as well,
fear
of social dislocation, loss of national sovereignty, our language and
way of life, our very identity as Americans. All our professional
entities are failing us on some level, even where there are good
moments of triumph and good people who want to do the right thing, if
only they knew what it was and only if they were allowed.
The greatest loss in this natural sphere is a loss of moral
certitude, a compass directed by the natural law and a safe place
wherein to raise our children and grandchildren. This would be bad
enough, but most of us see no end in sight, almost no hope in mere
human terms, as if
the nihilistic tendency has to run its full trajectory into complete
chaos and cataclysmic tragedy beyond comprehension. We feel [as we
ought
because this is truly the case] as if we are tax slaves, that our
leaders have their own agenda and world view that does not really care
about us, beyond what is absolutely necessary to maintain their power.
We are at war with ourselves, within our culture, a war that has no
rival in previously declared conflicts that can be discreetly measured,
as if it has no beginning and no ending, a phobic eternity.
This conflict has its own definition and has been declared by the
Prince of this world himself. It is of ancient origins, but many are
only now aware of it. And many more are unaware and strive to survive
another day heedless of the dynamics at play and the dimension of the
danger, partly due to good old American optimism, which is not the
Christian virtue of
hope, much more salutary and always more realistic.
However, they sense a
creeping fear, they can smell it even, it is palpable; they try to
ignore it, reject it
outright or blame those who call it back to their attention as if they
were the cause. Yet the
fear is real, it is there, it is the "1000 pound elephant" care of
practical atheism, a God-believing people who have little use for the
Almighty, God-believing but not God-fearing, in our
public
square and in our living rooms; we can pretend to ignore it---but
elephants have needs and a purpose too, they do not even know if we
pretend
they are not there, they are and they know they are. The elephant
stampede is upon us now, quickening, the thunderous sound of their
hooves approaching closer every year. Pat Buchanan calls it the "Day of
Reckoning". As we descend into the dark caverns of the servile state
and into wanton savagery, we search in vain for a secular savior. The
trajectory has a life of its own now and we are being carried along
with its horrific current. Pardon the mixed metaphors. They are
deliberate if not literary perfection.
This is happening to every
one of us, non-Catholic, pagan, atheist and
Catholics. All of us. Even those who are part of the herd, they, too,
are being harmed although they think they are above the fray and the
path of danger. Elephants don't care who they trample on when they
stampede. During the French Revolution, the guillotine was an equal
opportunity executioner, in the end, licking its sharp chops on its own
favored adherents.
On the supernatural plain the Catholic used to have an advantage when
times
are tough, Holy Mother Church, from the local parish and the priest, to
the friendly, fatherly shepherd, the diocesan bishop, to the good
shepherd in Rome, His Holiness the Pope. Oh, they are still there but
not in the same shape and much of the Catholic landscape, from Gothic
spires to pagan temple monstrosities, has changed
along with the safety net it used to provide, the security of grace,
unselfish love, compassion for the bereft of spirit, and hope, not
optimism, but hope.
You knew that when
you died you had an almost 100% chance of receiving the last rites with
Confession and Viaticum and a proper Requiem Mass for burial. You knew
that your children either had a sound Catholic school to attend, and if
not, a reliable Catholic education during the week for religious
instruction. The priest was not perfect as none of us are perfect, but
he knew the faith, the true faith, and in his own way as best as he was
able, he passed it on. You did not have to deprogram your children
after
Sunday Mass or risk being scandalized yourself. Priests were masculine
and wholesome in their appearance and conduct and you knew that your
son could
serve at the altar and be enriched with sacerdotal things, perhaps the
seed of a vocation. Your daughter did not even think it fitting to
follow therein. You could count on the necessary things and lots of
extra gifts from the bounty of God's generosity from time to time. Life
was a struggle as it is meant to
be, but it was good because if you worked hard and did your best, you
could get by and your children could do better, and even work off some
Purgatory time. Purgatory on earth
so to speak. You never counted on Hell on earth with all its fury. Who
could???
Now uncertainty and a dim trumpet to echo the former triumph of the
Faith, is all there is, as Chris Ferrara says, "a facade." And the
elephant knows it, too, better than we do and he can smell our fear.
Now fear provokes a reaction in one of three ways generally speaking,
within human beings. Some curl up in a fetal position and hunker down,
hoping the stampede will pass them by and remain unscathed; still,
others in true flight or fight fashion, gear up for battle and go to
slay the dragon, in our case an elephant or two, and sometimes succeed.
There is a third reaction, and that is halfway between the first and
the second, halfway, but not a middle way. This is the lash strike, the
flaying about of the fearful person who knows something bad has
happened to him, he suffers the brunt of the injury and injustice
enormously, but
feels powerless to defend himself and all that he holds dear with any
effectiveness. He feels less a man, yet not a mouse. He has been
neutralized, through no fault of his own, but by circumstances beyond
his control, a bishop who will not listen apart from a clever PR spin,
the local priest is not concerned with Heaven or Hell although he talks
endlessly of the first and delivers plenty of the second through his
neglect of his parishioners crying out to him. This kind of man [or
woman] has to have some place to go and we of the Catholic media,
newspapers, the web, little journals, apostolates of evangelization,
are ready targets.
Now
these people in dire need do not realize this is the underlying
dynamic, they are merely reacting to stave off losing their faith.
Actually this is a sign of hope, the blustering man of complaint,
something is going on there inside of him, there is life still
bursting. All too many just took the easy way of surrender and human
respect, the road more easily traveled because it is easier, and
settled down to losing his faith one step at a time, or risk doing so
at the very least. Too many. Like the Arians of long ago, will, they,
too,
wake up one day and find themselves no longer Christian? Apart from the
name? They are legion, in every parish, telling the braver sort to just
shut up and follow along with the lord of change, the lord of the
dance,
Quaker Catholicism or any such name you care to call it, it is all the
same gibberish, the same jive. It can't save you. It sounds light and
full of frivolity, but it is actually molten lava straight from Hell.
It is like someone
wishing you luck when what you need is a sincere short prayer. "My
thoughts go with you." Oh, please, do you not know, it is your prayers
I need, your thoughts you can keep to yourself.
Meanwhile Rome fiddles while Christendom burns; oh sure some good
pronouncements here and there, solid statements and some attempt to
right the Barque of Peter floundering on the shoals of a rocky
seashore.
But the 1000 pound elephant---updating and the modern spirit, the
arrogant tinkering with sacred things---has been set loose to prowl as
if a roaring lion to devour both sheep and shepherds, and the wolves
among us. Who needs a wolf when an elephant will do!! No matter how
hard our Pontiff strives, he is always playing catch-up, one step
forward, two steps backward, and on and on. He, too, has some erroneous
ideas to shed, which adds to the mass confusion, not to mention
confusion over the Mass. Does he still think that Hans Küng, that
tired old heretic cleric is worthy of praise? Does he still advocate an
anti-Syllabus counter to the Sainted popes of the past century and in
violation of Tradition and Magisterium?
The Church has been so Protestantized that sometimes we Catholics start
acting like Protestants, even if we claim we don't have their beliefs.
We become in effect, our own popes. Modern man, modern Catholicus, has
no need of the papacy. Strange to say, it is those who uphold
Tradition that do, because it is of Christ Himself. We need Papa, our
Holy Father. The Pope holds the
keys to the kingdom and no one else, by design of Him Who founded His
one true Church the font of salvation and source of all graces. As one
man explained it to me, "Things are in such a
state of confusion that I have to have my own fortress where I know I
am safe. I have drawn my own lines around my castle." It is in quotes
but I think I am paraphrasing somewhat. He said something very close to
this as I recall. Those lines we draw are our magisterium of how we
ought to proceed and if others do not measure up they are immediately
suspect as belonging to the out group, "the others." In other words,
like it or not, a virulent strain of Jansenism has made a remarkable
comeback. And this intransigence is at the root, born of fear and not
of malice. Some of us with e-mail addresses are caught in the
crossfire. I know this and I bear no anger at all, but instead have
real empathy. But try to tell a frightened man he is frightened. It is
a waste of time and even patronizing. He has no patience with himself
and with you, he just wants to be safe, just safe, that is all. His
little demands are that because he is tired of asking politely
elsewhere
in the proper halls of redress. So he lashes out without meaning to.
This is all
there is to it. This is easy to forgive, it is so human and such a sign
of hope, at least he is still asking, he hasn't given up! Praise be to
God! Thanks be to God for cranks and thanks be to God for those who are
nurturing and sweet and understanding and kind. All is a sign of
vitality and the goodness of Almighty God.
Saint Catherine of Siena has been especially on my mind and in my heart
of late. Strictly looking at the Church crisis of her time, the Western
Schism, the Avignon Papacy beholden to the French kings, a contemporary
could say she was a failure, she thought so, too. Yet, she actually
succeeded in drawing the Pope, Gregory
XI, back to his rightful See, and throne, the Chair of Peter in Rome;
given the exigencies of the politics of the time, quite a feat, won
through her sacrifices and the grace of God. Whenever I tend to lose
perspective I like to call to mind St. Catherine. If I may use a
prosaic analogy: A few years ago my beloved maple tree, of over a
hundred years old, suffered sequential damage from severe storms summer
and winter and had to be chopped down. That tree was an old "friend"
for under her I was shaded from the burning noon sun as I sat to read
to be attentive to the voice of God. My husband, ever the tender
spouse, obtained a small sapling, another maple to plant in the old
tree's stead. It was not that much to look at in the beginning and we
thought it might not survive the first season. But there was something
about this young tree that said determination to me. On impulse,
without thinking I named her Catherine after the Saint; then apologized
to that Doctor of the Church and to God for being so cavalier with a
sacred treasure, the name of a Saint. Yet somehow it seemed to be
accepted as an honor to St. Catherine. The very next year that young
maple had doubled in size and strength and in the autumn she was
arrayed with a glorious profusion of color as if to sing her praises to
Heaven and to the Saint. Our mountain ash had likewise been destroyed
by a storm so my beloved had another planted across the yard from young
Catherine. He was tall, but thin and a bit dilapidated around the
edges. I named him Dominic and today he is thriving, reaching up to
Heaven with all his might and last summer his first clusters of tightly
gathered orange berries were on display. Hard work and trust and leave
the rest to God. He keeps score, not us. What He wills, because He
wills, when He wills because He wills it. So these are the times that
call out for another mighty Catherine of Siena, though she is one of a
kind and a Vincent Ferrer, he, too, one of a kind, and an Anthony of
Padua/John the Evangelist. I have found my own personal Vincent and
Anthony/John, but look on with hope for this Catherine who will come
along to gently, but persistently, time after time, like St. Catherine,
speak with her heart and soul to the Roman Pontiff to bring him home,
this time not to Rome, but back to Tradition, all the way home.
It is a long journey. For you and me also. Let us pray for one another
without ceasing and for our beleaguered Papa Benedetto in Rome, whom I
know has no malice in his heart but is still somewhat unsure how to
proceed. Let us love him in patience even while we recognize the
problems that remain. It is a desert also, not only a rocky shoreline.
A desert where the elephant, a creature of the jungle, his natural
habitat, has adapted, despite the camel's dominion, arid heat and few
palm trees to plunder. A desert with scattered outposts of Tradition
nestled in a verdant glade of rest and shade and cool breezes. Let us
repel the marauding elephant from all memory.
Come
all ye soldiers of Christ, who travel by caravan, come all ye sailors
of Christ who sail by sea, come one, come all, let us be intrepid
mariners and courageous foot soldiers and march under the banner of
Christ the King and the Immaculata, trusting in the promises of Christ
and Our Lady of Fatima, come, let us devote ourselves to prayer in all
that we do and all for God and His kingdom, His reign!
THE RACE IN THE RACE: LIES MY MOTHER NEVER TOLD ME, OR THE NEW RACISM
OF THE 21ST CENTURY
March 28, 2008
It is often said that a dog is man's best friend. I
suppose that this is sometimes true, especially in these
doggone days of ours. A good dog is not only known for his loyalty to
his master, but has a keen nose for discovering the scent of things
that really are, friend and foe alike. Those of us who write
commentary
on the national scene
require "knowses" too, for there is about us now the putrid stench of
racism and bigotry for the sheer malice of it, not the cruelty born out
of ignorance and centuries of inherited barbaric habits and sinful
economics. While
one does not need a
sharp sense of smell to detect the evil, one needs to unearth or know
the code
words for the new racism, the politically correct, if not a morally
good---the racism of sheer hatred for those classified as White, or
those not sufficiently Black enough, for
hatred's sake, and imposed on us by the
media and other institutions of power, the majority of them White and
obeisant to the new masters of group think who deftly use the media to
inculcate the ideology of Black supremacy. Pack journalism is all it's
cracked up to be and more. We must be clear-headed enough to recognize
the web of lies that are spun to entrap and contain anyone who
challenges its audacious, contemptuous hegemony.
As I write this piece the American
polity is poised to elect not only the most extreme, rabid pro-abortion
advocate in the US Senate, to promote him to the Presidency, with the
help of three-quarters of the media undeniably rooting for him,
including the news cadre, and some misguided Catholics
who truly ought to know better,
such as the much vaunted pro-life Casey of
Pennsylvania who has endorsed this ultra-liberal abettor of baby
killers; the President-select of the media is also a member of the new
Racist
elite---whether he is honest with himself or not about this. I may have
to forgive them, even love them because they are my neighbors, but I do
not have to approve or applaud the Obamarama clamor. It's a scam of
giant proportions. The big lie always succeeds where the little ones
fail. Let the good
times roll, benighted people!
Whites
are now a suspect class by virtue of their birth, not anything they as
individuals may do or have done. "Whiteness" as a shameful thing, is
the
tacit tenet of social intercourse for the ordinary citizen, while
generally accepted more openly among the elite. Whites in particular
denigrate themselves or at least do no objecting to their reduced
status as semi-human, most especially the male half of the race. They
are
thought to be whiners or closet racists if they do.
This is why one well known actress who is exactly half Black and half
White says she is only Black and in fact has disparaged her White
parent and her heritage. Please note that often [there are exceptions]
the term, White
is spelled with a lower case w to stress the belittlement while Black
is always with a capital B. I learned this when I was undertaking some
social research for a course I had enrolled in at the local university
some years ago. Pages of documents all with lower case w and upper case
B, when used. More usually Black Americans were classified as
African-American, by necessity upper case.
Ironically, the parent this celebrity rejects for her Whiteness
cared for
her, while the Black parent abused her shamefully. Thus the sheer
hatred out of
malice. She is not challenged on this; of course anyone can decide for
themselves who they want to identify with, this is not the issue; the
issue is that racial classification is the defining criterion, not
character or achievement or love or holiness or anything of merit at
all, just
the color of one's skin, for which no one has any say in. As
if it ought to matter in the first place.
Those who used to know better have now decided to make it matter and
matter most. Better a selfish Black parent than a self-sacrificing
White parent is
the new standard. And she is not alone. Identity politics, meaning---by
the
code---is Black identity rather than White. This is why Sen. Obama who
is half Black and half White is hailed as "the Black candidate". Well,
a
thinking person who still possesses the use of reason will ask, if he
is "Black" because he is half Black, how come he is not "White" because
he is half White? He isn't any more "the Black candidate" than he is
"the White candidate". He's both if you have to label this way.
Period. It would be different if he were a candidate who happened to be
such and such, as in passing. His purported race of Black is not even
the subtext, it is the text, the banner, the headline, the raison de
etre. Now half the pundits are insisting that if Whites do not vote
for him it is because they are racist; the other half are telling us
the Blacks who vote for "the Black candidate" because he is Black, even
though they know his spotty track record are not racists. Hmmmm. I
guess this must be what they mean by "Black value system" as opposed to
just plain old values. Another of the code words for the insiders. This
is why Obama sat in the same pew for twenty
years listening to hate speech and bigotry, such as "garlicky noses"
for Italians, "typical White folks" to characterize Whites as all
alike,
unlike, of course, the bigoted phrase Blacks claim to despise so much
"You people". Right! Ironically we
keep
hearing about all the racism
this society perpetuates still, that Blacks are held down by this and
that conspiracy or institutional policy. Well, if this were really the
case, there would be no cachet in calling oneself all Black when one is
only half Black. Obviously being known as Black is an asset, not a
hindrance to success. The aforementioned actress keeps getting the
starring roles,
even though she is a racist. Barack Obama is not challenged on his
policies because he is the preferred candidate who is Black, not
bi-racial, just "Black". So he gets a pass. Not only does this demean
him as a man because it is patronizing as it suggests he can't pass
muster by the same rules everyone else has to play by, but it also
imperils
the country. The polity has a right to the public record of its
candidates who claim they are fit for office. And to examine it under a
public microscope. It also endorses racism, albeit in another form. Not
all racists are created equal under
the modern fascist state. [
1] Meanwhile
this
White-hating actress keeps getting the roles because
millions of Whites [who wish they were Black, too?], pay to see her
films.
Surely they know her ethnic heritage and her political stance. I mean,
if an old woman who avoids celebrity gossip with all due diligence
knows
these few facts, it is inconceivable that the younger crowd which
revels in all things celebrity does not know and apparently does not
care or harbors its own self-loathing, perhaps unaware of it
intellectually. It is comparable to the homosexual thing. It is now
chic to dabble in
the sordid acts of the sin that cries out to Heaven for vengeance [from
God]. Teenagers think it is so cool! The worst of both worlds as the
saying does not go. The trajectory in every sphere save Traditional
Catholicism and a few others who call themselves Christians, is now
toward deliberate alienation and annihilation, a particularly perverse
form of hatred itself. It is a death wish. How else explain a famous
Catholic who is willing to sell his soul in order to stand in the
tarnished limelight of the self-anointed who write books titled the
Audacity of Hope. More like hope in audacity! It takes no audacity to
have hope, which is a theological virtue given by God in the Sacrament
of Baptism. But it sure takes audacity to count on the audacity of
arrogance and to hope in it.
But I digress, only a little; the ugly race for the White House and raw
power
to impose one's cultural and political biases on the populace who have
little recourse in the advance of the rise of neo-fascism masquerading
as
the cause celebre of the moment is now a runaway train. A people not
given to cherishing the
study of its past in its proper perspective will most likely repeat its
worst aspects, human
nature being what it is.
The old racism, can be said to be one that no one could take pride in,
but because it had been so long a part of daily life in most cultures,
often with the assistance of tribal leaders who stood to gain by
selling their own kin [slave trading], that most people living with it
did
not really give it much consideration, unless they were the subject of
the injustice. For instance President John Q. Adams did not like
slavery and was in a position to do something about it during the
Missouri compromise. Instead, he did nothing, being more of a
pragmatist than a true leader. And yet, we know from his correspondence
that he bore no hatred towards those who came from Africa. Even the
presidents who held slaves of their own, knew the practice was morally
indefensible,
recognized their own hypocrisy. Change is hard. The deeper we are in
the mire and muck the harder it is to pull ourselves out. Pandora's box
writ large and tragic. Now racism and slavery are great evils and a
monstrous blight on
our past. We can't change that past but we can ruin the future if we
attempt to right past wrongs by punishing the innocent because the
guilty are long dead. This isn't justice, its revenge and uncivilized.
It does not end racism, it continues and strengthens it in a
spiraling and vicious cycle. In the old racism there was little hatred
involved, most people did not go this
far in the normal course of the day. This was one of the reasons
institutionalized, social bigotry and racism lasted so long in the
predominate culture. In the past I have known very few people of White
descent that I would
characterize
as being racists, but of the handful I have known malice and
hatred did not enter the passions. Most of the White people others
consider racist aren't really racist, they just prefer being with their
own
kind exclusively for what they perceive as cultural conformity and
say so. I know a number of Blacks who think the same way. Having
traveled in other circles I know that class and race do
not always overlap, in fact the differences between the classes are
greater than those between races, which are an artificial construct. If
they were valid and utterly necessary for human existence, we would not
have to keep changing the criteria and definitions of who belongs to
what category. When I was young there were just three races, now there
are five and on it goes. I know that people who are not comfortable
with those of differing skin color have a more pedestrian
experience, but I can not fault them as far as it goes. I am sure
there were some among us who had motives that involved
malice, but just as surely they have become less and less an
influential factor
in social arrangements, if they are non-Black. I am thinking of the
fringe elements of
society, such as the White Supremacists. Black Supremacists used
to belong to that fringe, too. Race demagoguery is now big politics and
bigger business for certain individuals calling themselves Black
Americans. They sit as arbiters of who is entitled to call himself
Black and how he is supposed to vote. They have a vested interest in
seeing that the myth of hard core institutionalized racism is as it
once was. This is why people who are part Black or as far as they know
are all Black and who do not toe the "party line", that is, wander off
the political plantation, are slandered and libeled and otherwise
denigrated.
Several
years ago I noticed a distinct shift in racial focus, a real burning
hatred for others who are not of the preferred race, Black and or
Hispanic. I do not know why those who inherited their genes from the
Iberian people are considered Black in some quarters, at least included
in that orbit. Hispanic is the new Black, I guess. I say this because
the bullies in power keep insisting that race ought not to matter [it
ought not], then do just the opposite. Perhaps it is the cachet appeal.
The first time I
became aware of neo-racism, I was walking down a side business
street of Hartford, Connecticut, when I was
accosted by a gang of
five thugs with dark brown skin brandishing razor blades and contempt
in their eyes. I was alone,
taking a leisurely stroll, and suddenly they had me surrounded. They
said not a
word but glared at me while taking swipes at me and my coat with the
blades. Little nicks, some drew blood, some tore my coat, most were
empty attempts to frighten me. Oh, I was plenty scared, but not
frightened. There is a difference. Fright is another word for terror.
Scared is when loud thunder and flashes of lightning give you pause. I
knew that at any moment one of the
blades could slip and slash my throat clear through as they were sharp.
But I was not
frightened in to panic because I could tell from their eyes they wanted
to see my reaction. The guy I figured was the leader kept staring at me
as if wanting a stare down match, I gave back as good as he was giving.
It was all so odd and surreal, for I noticed that he had beautiful
eyes, the kind of eyes an artist likes to capture in paint if at all
possible. My forbearance saved my life [an unfortunate slip?] or at
least a trip to the
emergency room to stop the bleeding. After what appeared to be several
minutes---at times like these a minute seems an eternity---he dropped
his razor blade and signaled the others to do likewise, and said the
only words he uttered: "Whitey ain't goin' scare, let's go!" And they
were gone. A Saturday lark. Just as quickly as they appeared, they
disappeared. It
wasn't until then that I noticed a group of folks watching, I do not
know how long they were there as I had been intent on staring down this
guy as my life might depend on it. They all turned away as if not
concerned. I am a small town girl with a small town way of looking at
life; it was obvious to me they had seen it all before and turning away
was par for the course. This was more shocking to me than the attack,
which was as shocking as things got in those days. As I said I have a
small town view, and so I mistakenly presumed that this was some kind
of exception for me who would be going back to that small town and a
peaceful way of life. I decided to file it away under E for experience,
then forget things as best as I could. That did not last long as it
turned out. Silly me.
My husband had a conference at the university, Bangor campus, and I
accompanied him for the day so I could use the library and visit a
gallery open to the public. I had stopped in at the Bears' Den, the
local hangout/restaurant for lunch. The place was packed, there was
only one table left with seats. It was occupied by a a single woman,
who was Black by her appearance. It never occurred to me that I should
not approach her. Students share tables in general there, wherever one
can get a seat. It's this way at all the campuses. Being raised to be
polite I observed the amenities and
asked her first if I could have one of the seats. She knew the place
was filled and that I had a tray laden with lunch. She reacted with
hostility and yelled at me, "I don't eat with Whitey." The only seats
left were at that table. I saw a security guard and went over to him to
explain the situation, saying that I had a right to sit in a vacant
chair, but I did not want a ruckus. I was asking for his kind
assistance to smooth things over. He turned away from me with a shrug,
saying that the young woman in question could do as she wanted to. He
knew the code of dishonor and acted upon it. Now, if she had been
"White"
and I an African-American, do you honestly think his reaction would
have been the same? If you do, you have yet to wake up from a long
slumber
of at
least twenty years. At that time "Whitey" was used like the "N" word
used to be thrown about. All the incidents I am describing occurred
during the zenith of the get Whitey phase of the movement. Today, words
I can not list here because of
decency, are the vocabulary [?] of debasement.
Not long after this incident I happened to be walking on the main
business street of Augusta, our state capital, when a Black man
carrying some papers approached me. He was seeking donations for some
cause, he said. I asked him what the organization was, and he gave me a
look I
will never forget, and his eyes, if they could have spit, it would have
been hatred in liquid form, and he said to me, "We are going to build
bombs to blow up "Whitey!" Then he laughed sneeringly and just kept
walking down the street with an exaggerated swagger. The on purpose
kind to grind the contempt in deeper. He had stopped me
for the express purpose of venting his rage and hatred. I had had an
appointment at the
doctor's
before this occurrence, a couple of years I think and had almost
forgotten it until ... There were two patients in the waiting room, a
Black woman and me. She had brought a paperback book with her and was
reading. We made eye contact and I asked her what she was reading,
simple curiosity as a book lover and inveterate reader. Inciting World
War III was not my intention. She put the
book down, and removed some papers that were folded up between the
leaves and said very matter-of-factly, and most icily, "Ways to kill
Whitey!" Just like
that as if she was reading a recipe for chilled vegetable soup. I do
not know
if she was just hostile and putting me on for some strange amusement or
if she was serious. I did not pursue matters further. By that time I
already had internalized the drill, Whites, and or those of you who
look more White than not, you piece of trash, shut up
when we superior Blacks are speaking and like it or else! We hate you
because some of your ancestors enslaved us and we don't care if your
family were not slave owners or even in this country back then, we hate
you anyway because your skin is white. Even if you aren't White. And
you can't call us racists
because only Whites are racists. Several African-Americans made this
last political rant to me years later. This, too, is part of the code.
And it is a
no-win situation. Complain, you are
a racist, don't complain, you are too stupid and weak to deserve better
and we are doing you a favor by subjecting you to the misery you merit.
Any person who is more than half White or all White by now knows the
civil rights law does not apply to him unless he goes to court to fight
for his rights. IF HE TRADES ON HIS BLACKNESS DESPITE HIS SKIN TONE,
THEN ITS OLLIE OLLIE FREE! If it were otherwise, we wouldn't have
needed all those famous
cases going all the way to the Supreme Court. Just like the
so-called English-Spanish debate. Actually there is no authentic
debate,
just the controversy that purports to be an honest debate. In an open,
honest debate, where the truth truly is the quest, both sides start off
with no handicap. The code
of social enforcement dictates that if you live in Florida and a few
other states, like Massachusetts, New York and Pennsylvania, for
instance, and you are an employer who wants to refuse to hire people
who do not speak Spanish, even though your clientele is still largely
English-speaking, and want to hire people who cannot and will not speak
English, you are free to do so. If you want to have it in reverse, you
are a racist and a bigot and have to hire an attorney so you can keep
your business open while you jump through a tangle of legal and social
hurdles designed to convict you in the press for the purpose of
convicting you---you have to keep explaining yourself. Trial by
media which likes it this way. How do I know? Just read the paper in
the morning when the latest phase of get Whitey [gringo] is
particularly active. Home Depot is on record in some locales as hiring
Spanish-speakers over English ones. I don't know the policy of Lowes,
but our local store has its signs in Hispanic, even though we are
largely Franco-American. This is irrational and to be PC before normal.
It means that 2% of the Hispanics in the city are preferred to the
largest group, French, which comprise a quarter of the population. Or
more to the point, the French were and are expected to learn English,
we don't expect Hispanics to. Insulting to everyone's dignity. Hate
movements and the irrationality they spawn are like volcanoes, they
have their up and down periods. Unlike volcanoes, it is more difficult
to gauge when the rage will erupt and overflow. Sometimes it does not
erupt, it just trickles down slowly so you aren't as prepared as one
ought to be. Like the pot of water getting warmer with a frog in it and
you are the hapless frog. I was visiting family in
Florida. My
mother had an acquaintance whose daughter applied for a position at the
local pharmacy. She did not speak Spanish; the patrons were half
Latino,
half English-speaking of other nationalities. So reason would lead one
to think that the employer would want employees of both kinds,
and if requiring employees to be conversant in both languages, it would
be
across the board. Reason is a lost art. The young woman was told that
she was not eligible because she did not speak Spanish. So you say,
well, what's wrong with that? Everything, you see, if she had spoken
Spanish only she would have been hired on the spot. The new immigrants
from south of the border,
too many of them anyway, think it an unjust imposition if they have to
learn English. So the signs now proliferate in Spanish, including
traffic directions in some cases, and non-Hispanic citizens are now
aliens in their own country where they were born to immigrants who
worked hard to learn English and were proud of it, and helped to build
America by
their hard work and sacrifice for the common good. And the haughty,
contemptuous alien, legal and illegal
alike of a certain nationality and political conditioning has no
respect for that tradition or the
norms of assimilation. They are now accorded full citizenship status as
aliens; they are the true "patriots". We are the bigots and xenophobes
who have
to prove otherwise. Guilty before proven. No need to prove, guilty
because "they" say so, so it is so. And the way the deck is
stacked, we will never prove it, nor should we have to even try. They
expect the larger culture
to submit to its
own demise. Our elites, including the media are assisting them in this
war they have declared. You and me, the older American, why we are all
just "collateral damage", don't you know? George Bush and his
anti-sovereignty bunch could not care less. And this brings us to the
election at hand and the slogan of "Change". Or, the lies my mother
never taught me!
The Obamarama spin machine declares change and more change, change we
can believe in. Oh, we can count on it all right, but we ought not to
believe it---it isn't change at all,
it is the same old tired, tried and failed socialism and open borders
policy that we have
now only worse because there will no longer be a counterpoint in the
Congress. Let's see now what "change" means.
We can count on the
following:
- a secure abortion culture with an pro-abortion federal court
system and more money for Planned Parenthood, for which he is a major
stooge; Obama is on record as saying that he will not back down from
his pro-abortion stance.
- the loss of national sovereignty as the open border gives way
to mass migration that will make an invasion seem peaceful by
comparison. Sanctuary cities, which Obama favors will increase, as if
we don't already have enough.
- Socialized medicine tweaked just an iota from "Hillarycare". Well
at least the Canadians won't have to make
arrangements to come here for treatment limited there.
- Oh he will get
us out of Iraq okay, but wait folks, this is not as it appears. Obama
is correct---we should never have gone there in the first place.
Getting out is not that easy. One would think so, but human nature and
the exigencies of war command otherwise. If a married man has an affair
with another woman and has children with her, then wakes up to the sins
he is committing and wants to change his life, it isn't so simple
anymore. He has real children and real commitments. He may go back to
his wife who has been faithful, though betrayed by him, but he cannot
abandon those children who are innocent and helpless. This isn't a
perfect analogy but I think you get the idea. How we get out of Iraq
can either doom that country and doom us in the future or not. There
are precious few how-to manuals on this one, folks. We may have been
precipitous going in, we need to be most prudent how we leave and when.
- Obama says he wants to change education. Is he kidding or what? I
mean,
the largest group of delegates at the Dems confab in August is the
Teachers' union [NEA] and they are against change in policy that would
hold
them accountable. They support Obama as I understand it.
There are lies, and then there are accursed lies!
- Obama wants to change the Bush economic policy and hints at other
NAFTA
arrangements. Hints, more like a double fudge koolaid to me. No matter,
he says he is going to raise taxes. The only time I believe a
politician, an egotistical politician, is when he says he is going to
raise taxes. You just have to know he means it and with a
Dem-controlled Congress, he really, really means it! Really! Slavery
under another guise.
The worst is his record of doing the bidding of Planned Parenthood
which
reaps millions slaughtering Black and Hispanic babies, the "unwanted".
Beyond pathetic. This man needs powerful prayer; apparently the
Reverend Wrong has not been doing any preaching on genocide in the USA,
except for the trumped up charge on AIDS. This alone ought to
disqualify Obama. His arrogance ought to be suspect immediately. Two
years in the US Senate and he thinks he is qualified in this day and
age. Hope in audacity, it bears repeating.
Meanwhile we have to endure the double standard on race and tolerate
our budding neo-racist-in-chief. You know, single incidents, taken by
themselves can be coincidences that are misunderstood. But a whole
series of them reveals a pattern of deceit and we are being scammed.
1.
He does not salute the American flag. What flag or banner would he
salute? Hamas? They say it was because he was distracted. Okay, I will
buy it, if ...
2. He saw nothing wrong with bigoted statements year
after year until he got caught and realized the stakes and his
quandary. So he apologized without really doing so. The no apology
apology per usual. So much for a new kind of politician. On top of that
he has had three conflicting stories which tends to point to lying.
Hillary is called a liar, he is well, well you know, not a liar, just
... The first story was that he knew nothing about these screeds
because he was not present. Then he said well, he was there for one of
them and knew about the others later. Then when a reporter said he saw
him there for another incident, he admitted he had known more all
along.
And to think Trent Lott, for whom I carry no water, felt compelled to
resign his leadership position for being a little impolitic on racial
matters. Double standard? with three alarms going off!
3. He claims to not want race interjected in the race, then when the
going got tough, he threw his White grandmother into the symbolic path
of a careening car, claiming while not a racist she said racist things.
Meaning she sort of is a racist anyway. His Black father did not raise
him, she did. I do not know why, that is none of my business.
Ingratitude and betrayal reveal a lack of character, which counts. I
hope, for her sake she is on the other side of
eternity, so she did not have to suffer this humiliation.
Even if it were true, it is not polite to rat on an old lady who has
been generous with her heart and soul. A President ought to at least
have the manners of a second-grader. No, this non-racial type has done
everything to fan the fires of
resentment and race-baiting. He may not have meant to; he may have felt
forced into it, but character, or the lack thereof, shows at a time
like this. Holding up your grandmother as "a typical White" just does
not cut it at all. This is the tactic of the repressed bully finally
exerting himself unjustly. But then, any man who thinks doctors ought
to be protected from lawsuits in botched abortions at the behest of PP,
otherwise known as the KKK of modern genocide, has a moral deficit
that does not preclude lying, contempt, and arrogance. He needs to grow
up first, pay his dues and really study the history of Planned
Parenthood and its racist roots. He ought to study the Psalms, etc.,
even more. We can't afford another experiment in sentimentality in the
White House. I am just waiting for that designation to be removed as
well. One Black preacher says Obama ought not to be elected because he
is not "Black enough!" Oh, how exquisitely poetic, speaking of
injustice. That is the only reason that ought not persuade someone to
vote against him. It is what a man thinks, not how he looks that is
crucial. In the age of the domination of the electronic media, image is
everything and substance a distant second. We are a shallow people and
our leaders count on us falling deeper into the callousness of
cowardice and prejudice, all over again. Change? Oh, if only that were
true!
Meanwhile the throbbing, lying beat goes on. Those of us who are of
mixed lineage are in no man's land, perhaps more
pariah than anything else, unless there is the public rejection of the
non-preferred nomenclature. The new ritual of coming out to match the
new racism. In truth we are all mixed by race. There is only one race
that matters, the human race, descended from one set of parents, Adam
and
Eve. It is only because human beings think with a brain that likes to
categorize, in of itself a human good, that we decided long ago, around
the time of the Tower of Babel and its infernal mischief of language
multiplication [now making its debut in America] that there
would be races, rather than family clans, and that this
would be the dividing line. Imagine the peril of human society if we
decided to do the same thing with blue-eyed people and brown-eyed
people, take your pick! It is not surprising and oh so ironic---that
fatal irony that keeps interjecting itself onto the scene---that
genealogists are discovering that so many people of a purported single
race are related several generations removed to each other. I am
convinced if they go back far enough and could document they will find
Adam
and Eve and their sons and daughters. All this mayhem and human
suffering because we prefer the word of evil doers to the Word of God.
If only we could be as serene as our puppy, Max, a golden retriever
plus, a mixed breed, who is content to follow his master and love
without limit. Look how sweetly he sleeps upon his pillow of tomes and
dictionaries. He has no need to confer with their denotations and
connotations. See all the colors of his fur that are also the colors of
the human race
upon his darling little face, black, white, yellow, red
and brown. Who could not love such a face or respond to it with joy?
Max has not an intellect, but operates on instinct as God intended him
to. So he cannot know the only God there is or ever will be, nor can he
pray to Him, but he renders God glory and praise in his own canine way,
because he is docile to his nature and obeys it, thus obeying his
Creator. Every dog should have his day they say. Well, ought not man
render unto God His day and act with the dignity that he was created
with and love his neighbor as his own because we are all brethren, just
like in every family, some are lighter skin than others, some have blue
eyes, some green and others brown, the same family. We don't have to
like everything about each other or always agree, but can we not
recognize each other as the awesome beings we are because God has
created each one of us in His Image and Likeness? Max likes to nap upon
books, he does not read them. He is content as he was made. I think he
is trying to teach us all something, if only we each had as good a
"knows" as he has a nose. And the gift of gratitude for the gift of
life, that we are all wondrously made, knit in the womb by our Creator,
that gift of gratitude without which there is no happiness.
Let us continue to love in the face of hatred, but let us not surrender
to these new bullies on the block; giving in empowers their evil deeds.
We forgive, with the help of the grace of God, but we hold up our heads
high, and keep telling the truth, even if it seems as if no one is
listening. It is good for our souls and good for our country. We cannot
change our neighbor, but we can change ourselves if we are tempted to
lapse into bitterness and become little bigots ourselves. Let us sleep
the sleep of Max and love without limit, loving the truth because we
love our neighbor. Supra: And the
gift of gratitude for the gift of life, that we are all wondrously
made, knit in the womb by our Creator, that gift of gratitude without
which there is no happiness.
This page is dedicated to Ma Tante Marie, a daughter of St. Dominic, of
the Convent of the Angels on Rue Henri Bourassa in Quebec City: she was
born in one era of the Church and died in another, obedient to her
superiors, but always keeping the Faith.
1.
For
those of you who do not understand what I mean by fascist, it is quite
simple. In communism, one form of socialism, the state owns everything
essentially. With the other form of socialism, fascism, the people own
capital and their homes, but the state is so onerous on the
restrictions
you have to follow to hold ownership and stay free of legal jeopardy,
that
practically speaking, you maintain the property for the state. Anyone
who
thinks this is a spurious charge, does not own land within miles of
"wetlands". And has not purchased a popular cookbook with yummy
recipes. If you think the land really belongs to you, for your
betterment and prosperity and that of your neighbor who might enjoy the
blueberries also, and that you truly own the book with the blueberry
pudding, you have a rude
awakening.
Let us take just one example.
The copyright laws now defy common reason and human
nature, the common
sense of natural reason. Raphael and Perugino would be in violation of
them today. According to at least one expert's opinion,
once you purchase the cookbook, you are not permitted to pass out a
recipe or two to others without the express permission from the author,
who did not write the recipes but gathered them, added a few pictures
and slapped a copyright on them. Now the author is entitled under the
law of justice to make a living and no one has the moral right to pass
off the cookbook as his own work. This is basic common sense under the
natural law. But the recipes he collected, by his own admission are not
his and are from tradition, ages ago and belong to everyone, also just
basic common sense. What he is entitled to copyright is his commentary,
his arrangements and any images not in the public domain, the cover,
etc. He is not permitted to copyright the title of the book even,
because titles are common usage descriptions, and, like facts, cannot
be copyrighted.
He cannot copyright that which is not his. No one has the
authority to give him such a right because these recipes are in the
public domain. In fact several of the recipes are identical in other
copyrighted books. I mean identical down to the last pinch of salt. Did
he steal from the other
authors? Of course not. But to imply that I am denying his
right to a living because I shared a few recipes is unjust. My local
library has cookbooks and I do not purchase most cookbooks because my
tax dollars have already paid for them and I borrow them like everyone
else. And if someone comes over to the house and wants to write down
one of the recipes I let her, from borrowed and purchased books. I do
not think I have committed the sin
of deliberately depriving him of a living should the book be
his. In the fascist state copyright is whatever who is in charge at the
moment says it is, so you are essentially providing a living for
others,
running the overhead of upkeep but the rights of true ownership remain
with others. Since the restrictions on what you can do with the books
are so repressive, you really are wasting your money purchasing them.
These books exist only for the author's standard of living not to
foster your enjoyment of life or your friends. What a twist of fate,
the author has prevented himself from his own living standard because
now that I know he is unreasonable, I have stopped purchasing his
books. From now on if I need one I will use the library for that also.
He used
to derive income from me, no more, except by way of confiscatory
taxes. Ironically if you are
open and honest because you know you aren't doing anything immoral, you
will be "caught", if you cheat because you think you might be doing
something illegal, pretend you are
not doing what you are indeed doing, you will get away with it.
Amazing. Truly amazing! How American actually, we reward those who
cheat and vilify those who don't or otherwise dismiss them as non
persons without rights of their own under the natural law. This is why
the clamor to go easy on the baseballers who cheated with steroids
arose then the outrage just slunk away as if it were the culprit. Some
athletes have been punished, but generally most people no longer want
to know; as one guy put it, "Let's just get on with the game." Every
grandmother who cooks now has to have an attorney on retainer. We are
expected to roll over and play dumber than Max the dog would ever
consider being. Once I purchase a book, unless I claim its work for my
own work and or use it to make my own living, it is my right to use it
to foster social life and happiness if the material is public domain.
If the snowfall recorded in Maine is 15 feet in some places, it is 15
feet. I don't care how many books copyright that fact, the fact itself
is not copyrightable anymore than my age is copyrightable. There is no
other reason to
purchase books of facts in the first place---recipes that have passed
into the public domain are facts; again, unless I am a collector. Who
do they think buys all these books? People who plan to use them in the
secret of some closet when no on one else is around? That's not joyful,
or natural, life is meant for sharing. Who wants to be a scrooge?
It is very interesting to digest the inner workings of the fascist
enterprise. Now, magazines are copyrighted, too, and are purchased for
doctors' offices. Patients in waiting rooms around the country who
haven't purchased these periodicals, take pen and paper and copy
recipes
down, all the time. So they don't have to buy the mag to get the
recipe. Sometimes the doctor's assistant actually assists a
patient by supplying the pen and paper. Thousands of times a day, year
after year. A pen is a mechanical instrument. According to copyright
law this should be covered under fair use and most copyright attorneys
would agree, but not some authors. When they say by no mechanical means
whatever, they mean it. Since they are in the driver's seat
they dictate against all reason. Some publishers say this violates
their ban on any mechanical reproduction unless the person is a book
reviewer. All bets are off who actually owns the book you just
purchased for 25 hard-earned dollars and counting or the magazine at
the grocery store for a fifth of that. In the modern fascist state the
Gestapo and the penal laws keep changing. Everyone and his brother is
confused and frightened. In Canada it is far worse. Members of families
are now reporting to me that they are afraid to say many things they
could openly discuss before. Nobody knows who will report on each other
or who will be singled out for "the treatment." Some people who are
pro-life are even afraid of their local priest, which is beyond horror
itself. Whether this is their perception or reality, I
am not sure. The fact that I am not certain is telling in itself. This
means it could be because perception has to be based on something other
than mere imagination. They might be overly cautious but the cause for
caution had to come from some source outside of themselves. Canada's PC
and other laws make ours look like paradise. Yet, as goes Canada, so
goes the USA, five years later as the general rule.
ADDENDUM, APRIL 6, 2008:
The Human Race and the Book of Genesis
There are some people who ask, how can there be all these
different races from Adam and Eve who were just two people?
I return the question, if they were the first [and only] two people,
where did all the various gene combinations come from, if not from them?
There is nothing in the account of the creation of man by God that
tells us about a restricted gene pool or the bodily characteristics of
Adam and Eve. In
Genesis, 2:7, it reads "And God formed man out of the slime of the
earth."
Now slime is a moist substance that has a quality of adhering to
another substance. In reference to the earth it means a rich, fecund
soil---a soil that is ripe to bring forth life. It can also refer to a
form of nasty waste, this latter definition is not apropos
to the sense
of the Scripture since there was as yet no Original Sin, no corruption.
Those of us who are avid gardeners study the soil we love so much: we
run our fingers through its velvety texture, inhale its pungent aroma,
gaze upon its
myriad blend of colors, hold it up to the sunlight and marvel, while an
exquisite joy explodes through us, but not without some poignancy, as
we recall that is from the earth we are formed and is to the earth that
we return at the end of this life here [Rite of Ash Wednesday]:
Technically speaking White people are not the color we associate with
white, like the fleecy clouds in the sky and Black people are not the
color we think of as black, such as the soutane and biretta a
traditional priest wears. Whites, are really shades of ecru and Blacks
are really differing hues of brown and so forth. Look at rich soil,
soil that is the most advantageous to grow crops and plants in: it is a
special kind of rainbow: ecru---dark brown, almost black. There is
yellow and red, too. The book, Pink and Brown People [1981]
by Dr. Thomas Sowell says much the same thing, but from a different
perspective: "MUCH OF WHAT IS BELIEVED about race and ethnicity is
based on representation rather than history." Indeed.
Long before I had heard of this distinguished scholar and economist, I
had arrived at the same conclusion. Sowell's book, one of the jewels in
my library, served to add another dimension, breadth and depth to my
perceptions of the socio-political dynamics of modern American life and
the roots thereof.
Now God formed Adam from the this fertile soil of the earth. He gave
him
his body and his soul, so that he was a human person, man, and then as
Genesis says, he set him in a lush garden called paradise. Genesis
also tells us that God made his natural mate, or wife, Eve, by forming
her from the side of Adam's rib, meaning she was of the same substance,
because it is the rib portion of the body that contains the heart, from
which flows the blood of life. She was formed from Adam's heart out of
the love of Almighty God, for the purpose of love itself. God's
creation was good and everything natural that formed its essence was
good, down to the last molecule and atom, the last chromosome and gene,
until Original Sin and the penalty of hardship, sweat, pain and death
and exile from the verdant garden God had made for man.
Just as good soil bears much fruit so, too, man was commanded by his
Creator to to bring forth the fruit of his loins, children, to "go
forth and multiply." The relationship is not coincidental, as with God
there is no such thing as coincidence. That soil, the soil in man
contained all that was needed for that multiplication. The enrichment
of that soil would be the very grace and commandments of God. His love
for them and His covenant with them, and their response and fidelty to
Him.
To assert that two people comprised the inherent characteristics that
make up what we refer to as "races" is not possible is to
call God a liar and to limit God's power. The Church has always taught
that the historical book of Genesis is to be taken as it says in the
Creation account, at once and two distinct actual people, Adam and Eve,
who are
the progenitors of the human race.
There
is nothing that the Church teaches that says anything about the
physical makeup of our first parents, how tall they were, etc. We know
they lived much longer than we do now---the list of the Adam and his
descendants, with years of life---and that Adam and Eve were created
without Original
Sin, like the Angels. Now since we see with our own eyes the various
coloration of the human race, eyes, hair, skin, we know that the
beginning gene pool had to have contained those genes, all of them,
complete in origin in Adam and Eve.
The first classification of peoples were not so much a distinction by
physical characteristics as they were by culture---family, clan, cult
or belief and
location of settlement or dispersment. It was only man, after
generations of living in sin and alienation, experiencing cruelty---his
own and those of others---that racial definitions took on the contrasts
and the positive and or negative connotations they do. There were Medes
and Samaritans, Ethiopians, Persians, Israelites, and so forth.
Moses' wife was known to have darker skin than he did. It was of no
import at the time. Now Ethiopians
as we know them today are largely classified as Black. They are not
Black because they are Ethiopian or Ethiopian because they are Black.
The gene pool of the people that intermarried most with those having
similar dominant genes, over time settled in some regions more than
others. Ethiopia has a predominant Black population by virtue of this
natural conflux. In biblical times they were Ethiopians, not Blacks.
Today they are Blacks because we say they are in our tendency to
classify, classify. But why not just classify them by nation,
Ethiopian, period? Every human being inherits his physical features
from his parents who inherited theirs from their own, all the way back
to Adam and Eve, two real people. The genes we have just did not jump
out of the ground or from the air one day and enter the bodies of human
couples having children. They have always been there.
So you counter, Well how can two people have a "Black" baby and a
"White" baby if they are the only two people, the first two? I answer,
you are assuming they either had one or the other set of descriptive
constructs, without any basis. In other words, the
same way your parents may have several children. Some have blue eyes,
others brown or hazel or green. The same two parents. Genes mingle with
and influence each other, some are more dominant at times than others,
depending on other gene admixtures. This is why in a mixed "race"
family,
say White and American Indian, one child will have the pale skin of the
Irish-Scott-French side, another the darker skin from the Indian side.
The same two
parents. It happens all the time, we all know those awful milkman
jokes. We ought not assume ethnic lineage from skin tone. We also know
that in some families it is the very opposite. We all come from or know
large families of say, ten children, where not only do the mom and dad
look much alike, all of their offspring resemble them almost
completely, so much so that the children, apart from age, appear as if
double quintuplets. Now, for the sake of thought, imagine three such
families, unrelated to one another by close generational degree,
migrate to the state of Kansas, some small town where they are the only
Catholic families. Upon arriving they discover that they are the only
Catholics in town and one another simultaneously. They have a natural
affinity
because of religious belief and family interests that are impacted by
their Catholic faith. While not withdrawing from their other neighbors,
as they are devout Catholics who practice love of neighbor, much of
their social intercourse is among one another, simple human nature and
common sense. There are no ulterior motives or malice towards another
who is not Catholic. Over time the children become adults and while
some migrate to other locales, many of the second generation remain in
that small town; they marry members of the other families and have
large families of their own. Eventually the bishop sends a priest and
they have their first parish church. Like minded Catholics arrive and
that small town grows. Some of the families are of a different ethnic
heritage, others almost like that of the original three. There is again
intermarriage. Depending on the strains of dominance of the gene pool
the physical attributes of these Catholic families will either appear
more alike than different or not. If the former, anthropologists in the
future could be led to describe the people there as belonging to such
and such a category and that town identified with it because these
families have proliferated and are the majority eventually. Now take
this little parochial [no pun intended] example and apply it to whole
regions of continents. I think you see what I am trying to convey.
Well it was the same for Adam and Eve; we do not know anything about
what they looked like, other than their nakedness after the First Sin,
nor their sons and daughters. Perhaps the gene pool
became more defined over time or Adam and Eve, if they could be seen
now as they were then, would look like a combination. Who knows, does
it matter? Skin and eye color have the same properties, that is, they
are the result of a mixture of genes or the absence of one confluence
versus another. This is all there is to it. I stand by my declaration,
that the race classification we go by is an artificial construct
subject to change; in truth there is but one Race, the Human Race. I
use the term artificial not to imply that it is also arbitrary, for the
classification of the peoples of the earth have some order and
rationality, physical commonality. And there is nothing wrong in this,
it is perfectly natural and in accord with human reason. It is the
value we give to these commonalties that can become the problem, and
usually does---unjust and unreasonable, per Dr. Sowell, supra.
It is the imposition of disparate value and all the social arrangements
based on this value that is artificial, simply because there is no
basis in fact for doing so other than blind prejudice.
QUERIES FOR SEN. OBAMA: DO YOU STILL BELIEVE THAT ...?
April 29, 2008
I believe you when you repudiate the abhorrent beliefs your former
pastor spewed out on his media jag. This man is filled with hate and
bigotry unbecoming any man who professes belief in Jesus Christ.
Senator Obama, I read your updated book, DREAMS FROM MY FATHER, which
you wrote when you were a young lawyer, just a few years ago, and in
which you exhibited bigotries of your own.
Are we to now believe that you no longer hold that:
You are a Black man? Are you now saying you are no longer the Black
Candidate? Will you now insist that if your heritage is alluded to it
is now the Bi-Racial Candidate? When you were selected president of the
Harvard Law Review, you said it was an achievement for a Black Man. But
you are not Black, sir, you are part White and Cherokee. Why was not
your achievement that of a White and Cherokee Man, too. After all, if
you are Black because you are half Black, are you not also
White-Cherokee for the same reason?
Are you still Afro centered? Or are you now American centered and only
that?
Do you still think that:
The heartland of America, its people and culture are
"the
dab-smack, land-locked center of the country, a place where decency and
endurance and the pioneer spirit were joined at the hip with conformity
and suspicion and the potential for unblinking cruelty."
Is it just middle America that has a potential for cruelty or every
person who is born with Original Sin? If the latter, why write such
bigoted screeds in the first place?
When you wrote:
of your friend Joyce who is telling you:
" 'I'm not black, ... I'm multiracial.' Then she started telling me
about her father, who happened to be Italian and was the sweetest man
in the world; and her mother who happened
to be part African and part French and part Native American and part
something else. 'Why should I have to choose between them?' she asked
me. Her voice cracked, and I thought she was going to cry. 'It's not
white people who are making me choose ... no, it's black people who
always have to make everything racial. They're the ones making me
choose. They're the ones who are telling me that I can't be who I am
...'
and you answer:
"They, they, they. That was the problem with people like Joyce ..."
Does this mean that you only consider yourself all Black, unlike Joyce
whom you castigate?
And so forth, so many bigoted statements that give one pause and then
some. I was appalled. This is why I was not surprised by Jeremiah
Wright.
Mr. Obama, we still do not know who you are? The pall of bigotry is
wrapped so tightly around you we scarcely know what to believe about
you. Your very words are those of a bigot. If you do not know who you
are, how are we supposed to?
BLOODLINE: UNHOLY ALLIANCE AGAINST THE HOLY FAMILY
May 8, 2008
This is not our usual column. Instead I am turning it over to Jeffrey
Smith:
A new motion picture attacking traditionalist Catholic beliefs
is opening in New York on Friday May 9th. "Bloodline" is a more
detailed and extreme version of the Davinci Code.
which has come to wide notice here. The film also has received a very
considerable national promotion when it was covered last week by This
is the old saw that members of the holy family migrated to
France and the bloodline of the holy family still exists in France
guarded by secret circles. The movie was slated
to be the typical smallish village art theater offering until it began
to receive very well financed advertisingABC's Nightline.
The advertising is very offensive with the tag line "what if the
greatest story ever told was a lie?" (Imagine if this was being said
about any other religion?)
A number of Catholic Traditionalist
groups are considering a manifestation of faith during the film's
opening weekend May 9th to 11th. The Film is at the Village East Cinema
at 181 Second Avenue in Manhattan.
Last year, the protests at the Davinci Code
drew major public notice and some media coverage. Thousands of items of
Catholic Traditionalist oriented literature were distributed on 42nd
Street near Times Square over the three day opening weekend.
Please call me:
Jeffrey Smith 1-347-325-3323 or 212 886 5413 if you reach my
voice mail, please leave a number and a TIME I can get back to you
both on the day you call and on the following day.
Thank you for taking the time to read this notice.
THE TURN OF THE SCREW May 16, 2008
In The Screwtape Letters
by C.S. Lewis, Screwtape, one of the higher up Devils, writes to his
nephew, Wormwood, whom he is instructing in the best methods of
ensuring the damnation of an earthly man, known only as "the Patient.
This is an excerpt:
The trouble about argument is that it moves the whole struggle onto the
Enemy's own ground. He can argue too; whereas in really practical
propaganda of the kind I am suggesting He has been shown for centuries
to be greatly the inferior of Our Father Below. By the very act of
arguing, you awake the patient's reason; and once it is awake, who can
foresee the result? Even if a particular train of thought can be
twisted so as to end in our favour, you will find that you have been
strengthening in your patient the fatal habit of attending to universal
issues and withdrawing his attention from the stream of immediate sense
experiences. Your business is to fix his attention on the stream. Teach
him to call it "real life" and don't let him ask what he means by
"real".
Precisely.
Don't let him ask any question that might illicit the hidden meaning
behind infernal lies---or the "fatal habit of attending to universal
issues".
I write of the California Supreme Court's 4/3 decision that same-sex
financial arrangements and other benefits are not enough---the right
to
marry is a "natural" right, and thus California's referendum which
passed with over 60% of the
citizens' approval, declaring that marriage is between one man and one
woman, is unconstitutional. For those of you who are prone to vote for
less than principled conservatives for federal office because "they
will at least give us the right kind of justices", please note well
that the majority of the justices concurring with this redefinition of
the "natural" law were Republican nominated. In fact the majority of
that court is gratis Republican naiveté. I will say one think
about
liberals in general, they may be wrong, but they are not stupid. They
at least see clearly when in the position of nominating candidates for
the courts. So-called conservatives simply do not. They are our worst
enemy after the infernal one. Just as in the Catholic Church, the real
enemy of Tradition is not liberalism and its activists but
"conservatism" and its adherents, that is non-Traditionalists who wear
the
mantle of Traditional Catholicism, confusing matters for the average
Catholic. Ann
Coulter's latest book title, If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be
Republicans
is short sighted. If Republicans had any brains they would be true to
core conservative principles without which they can never hope to beat
the libs at their own game, instead of trying to out-liberal them, a
losing enterprise every time. This ruling on behalf of the indefensible
is prima facie proof #1.
With all the press and electronic media cant spewing forth it is hard
for beleaguered Americans to focus on the universal issue, rather than
the hysterics generated by the particulars, which are indeed, fodder
for outrage for any normal person.
There is no need to expound on the implications of this ruling, we all
know what is at stake.
What the pundits are not talking about are three cogent realities:
1.
Marriage is a a natural right, because it inheres in the nature of
the two sexes, male and female. Period. Any deviance, pun unintended,
from this naturality abrogates any "right". To claim otherwise is to
declare the unnatural natural, thereby negating the meaning of words
themselves. If the unnatural is the same as natural, there is neither,
by definition.
2. If the "right to marry" is a natural civil right for those who no
longer adhere to nature, how come it took
so long to discover this "right"? Especially since our legal elites
have banished the natural law in juris-non-prudence? There is
practically speaking no
natural law basis for the law itself according to jurists, and suddenly
it exists only when
four twisted, bent judges decide to overturn the just will of the
people to legislate from the bench. As the screw turns, will so also
the
nation? Infamy has its own trajectory.
3. Normal Californians, a gutsy people, it seems, have already begun a
citizen's initiative to overturn the ruling. Good for them, but "good
luck" as they say! This is attempting to unscrew the infernal thing the
wrong way. The screw will only become tighter. How? The same court will
no doubt rerule the same way once a pretext for such a ruling is
presented to it. Terms are 12 years. An eternity for the
electorate which can barely remember from one election to the next. If
they could they would throw the bums out of office in every state,
making them pariahs, rather than pharisees to be tolerated as a
necessary evil.
Normal, informed, and even more gutsy Californians ought to begin a
citizen's initiative to impeach these justices and to terminate the
Governator who won't oppose the ruling. Until originalist justices are
appointed to the court the same old battle will have to be waged, year
after
year, case after case. Human nature being what it is, the sodomites win
in the end, because they have nothing to lose by wearing down the will
of the people who become exhausted, because they are so normal.
In another matter, not unrelated to turning the screw, I comment
briefly on NARAL's support for infanticide supporter---Obama---and the
anger of the Clintonites who feel betrayed. It would be have been
laughable to watch the antics of the dem-fems in the media arguing
about who is most pro-abortion. Except the murder of helpless babies
whether in the womb or recently born is never a laughing matter.
Sometimes human nature is, though. I took a few minutes out of my day
to tune into the festivities on MS-NBC hosted by wolverine Norah
O'Donnell. In her exchange with the two Clinton gals she tripped up.
She started to say pro-ab ... and before the second part of the
adjective could spill off her tongue, one of the guests nudged
her toward the PC mandate, she corrected herself quickly and said
"pro-choice". O'Donnell is pro-abortion. She knows it as we all know
it. Pro-choice is about educational options, where there are real
choices for people who still live in the world---when an innocent
person is being killed, choice is not an authentic option. Sometimes
one just has to chuckle about human nature. And weep to see how corrupt
we have become that we insist on using names for things that turn the
screw tighter, lest the truth might escape.
UNDERMINING FROM WITHIN: THE PERVASIVENESS OF THE
INSIDIOUS TROJAN HORSE COMPLEX
June 17, 2008
I tuned in this morning for the Laura Ingraham radio show only to learn
that she is [I hope] temporarily not on the air, apparently from some
contract dispute or something similar. In the meantime, her show is
being hosted by guest "conservatives". Today's host was the erstwhile
MS-NBC contributor, Monica Crowley, the biographer and champion of the
late Richard Nixon who was in the vanguard of exporting contraception
to developing countries, a betrayal of the natural law. If Crowley
cannot get it right about Nixon it is to be expected she can't get it
right about other aspects of the natural law.
Now, no person in this world is all bad or all good. To her credit Miss
Crowley is a champion of the ideal of traditional marriage and is
aghast at the tyranny of the courts which rule from the bench, in this
case, declaring that "gays" have a "right" to marry under the
California constitution. At least this time they did not pretend to
find penumbras---they merely lied boldly.
Unfortunately Monica Crowley only served to undermine her own position
and that of the cause of the natural law as safeguarded by Tradition.
She just had to add a codicil to the Last Will and Testament of the
sanctity of marriage by averring, without any reason---that would
comport with the natural law or not---that we "have to have" 'civil
unions' and 'domestic partnerships', just not actual marriage. But it
was these two approbations that served to lead to "gay marriage" in the
first place---the old tried and true method of evil established by
"law" on the installment plan.
Exactly why must we have these so-called unions and other legal
entities to protect sinners from the wages of sin? She never provides
any, just posits them as "must haves."
This is not only intellectually dishonest, it is pusillanimous. As well
as insulting to the intelligence of every honest and true blue
conservative.
It is also insulting to the homosexuals themselves. This approach
merely convinces them how little some so-called conservatives think of
them, how non-chalant and uncaring about their souls. We
won't let you marry but you go ahead and sin anyway and we will allow
you some civic protections, you poor dears, who cannot control
yourselves, unlike the rest of us. It also demonstrates to them
how weak we consider our own position because we feel constrained to
bend their way by accepting their first arguments by which they have at
last triumphed. How can they respect a conservative position such as
this one purports to be? They cannot and will not, seeing us for the
buffoons we have become.
Monica went on to express outrage about the will of the people being
scorned. Crocodile tears I think. It is the people, the very same
people, the supposed majority, who refuse to throw out the bums and
riff-raff who give us such judges in the first place and will continue
to do so. The very same people who are up in arms over gas prices but
not so much incensed by infanticide anymore. Guts for gas but no pluck
for the preborn!
Such a people have no fire in the belly for impeaching and recalling,
the absolute civic duty of the people when the natural law is breached.
The same people who waxed supreme over the virtues of the recently
deceased Tim Russert, who, while effecting the face of a devout
Catholic, made common cause with mass murderers in the womb, a scandal
of monstrous proportions, if only shame and scandal had any authentic
meaning anymore.
Pat Buchanan is right, the cultural war is over and the enemy of
Tradition and right reason, has won. How else to explain that the
left's arguments have made such incursions in the camp of the supposed
cause of the right?
Things are not as they seem anymore and we ought to steel ourselves for
more betrayals from our "friends". Laura Ingraham, where are you? This
simply will not do! This fan does not glory in being a member of the
Crowley crowd, that madding crowd not nearly far away enough!
AS PALIN AS THE "KNOWS" ON YOUR MIND September 3, 2008
I have received various pro-life articles and or links to them via
e-mail the past two weeks. The notes accompanying them suggest or urge
me to write on the matter of abortion, very much on the minds of every
and any red-blooded American, Catholic or not who knows a baby in the
womb is a tiny person worthy of the protection of the law against
murder.
US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, recently elevated to the status of
theologian-elect [self-elect, that is, despite her insistence on
separation of Church and conscience] informs the nation that some
long ago Pope, who paid attention to medical "science" was not sure of
when the soul is joined to the body, and that therefore he permitted
some abortions, is a calumny, a purported truth wrapped around an
out-of-context extraction for the sake of political gain. Times have
changed! Several
bishops have spoken up to correct the Speaker for the sake of the Truth
and her immortal soul, and or have said that pro-abortion politicians
ought not to
receive Communion, the latest being Archbishop Nienstedt
of St. Paul and Minneapolis. Bravo, Bishops, bravo! Finally some
shepherds with real faith and the courage to back
it up! Before him we had the Bishop of Kansas City and
elsewhere---Archbishops Naumann [KC], Chaput of Denver and of course,
Burke, now of the Vatican, formerly the shepherd of St. Louis. Now I
understand that the Bishop of Scranton, PA has added his voice. And
again, yet another, Bishop Thomas Tobin of Providence Rhode Island as
of September 3. Query for Speaker Pelosi:
If Church and conscience are to be kept walled off from one another,
why use a misunderstood statement from long ago by a Prelate to back up
your perfidy? If your own Bishop can't tell you what you are obliged to
do [according to you] as a Catholic in order to remain in good
standing, objectively in the state of grace, how can one who was never
your
Bishop do so? I surmise you want things both ways and hope we don't
notice.
Way
before the ill reputed Pontiff is said to have uttered some
misquoted private statement, the Church and, indeed, the world, knew
when sanctions against killing the innocent life in the womb were
pertinent and compulsory, when it was known that new life was in the
womb. Even civil authorities refused to execute women who had a child
in the womb. How so?
We find the phrase quaint now, but I seem to recall the
oft repeated sentence, lyric poetry to the ear and to the human heart,
"She is with child." Simple, plain, and direct. The honest-to-goodness
truth. No one quarreled with it. How could they? They weren't
indoctrinated and re-educated in our modern Gulag camps of the
government schools for the new world PC. "She is with child." Time for
a comeback. Overdue time. Pro-lifers out there, Uncle
Sam needs you: cease and desist from using the phrase, "She is
pregnant." Instead, say, "She is with child." Simple, plain, and
direct. Pregnancy sounds like a condition, which it is, but it
describes
the woman, not the baby. It is too pedestrian. Time for eloquence, with
substance. Simple, plain, and direct, like ...
Well, she's anything but Plain, although she is simply direct. With the
advent of one Sarah Palin
on the national political scene the cultural war is back front and
center. The evil of abortion
had been relegated to an occasional status, here and there in some
quarters, playing a distant fiddle to the economy and
health care. A most unhealthy enterprise to look forward to for months
on end. It will always be the economy, stupid because it is considered
a "safe topic". And it will always be so because Americans are willing
to lie to themselves, to think that they can have it both ways, come
out slugging against "partial birth abortion", while supporting Roe v
Wade for
earlier butchery. Mother Theresa said that war was the result of
abortion. A bad economy is also. A contracepting, aborting people are
without virtue and the self-control it takes to make sacrifices to
establish a commercial venture designed to promote the common good, not
one's purse alone. Sarah Palin is challenging us to be the best we can
and ought to be.
The debate on "partial abortion" is one stratagem we ought to avoid
where
possible, for it undermines our own arguments for the sanctity of life
itself.
The trouble with a drop of arsenic in one's tea
is that after a few cups you get really sick. Only in this case the
drop is the partial form of slaughter; babies are dying, does it matter
how old they are? Remember you aren't getting any younger either, will
age play a key role for you, too. I am not being coy when I say I know
you know what I mean.
But
Barack Obama, the media-created superstar from out of nowhere has
the audacity to hope that we will be so concerned about our own
"health" care that we do not care about a society's moral health, to
focus on the lies he dishes out to his fawning, adoring media flunkies.
He takes the high road in the Palin controversy, knowing full well that
the major media, which are in the tank for him because he is a "Black"
symbol, [pretty patronizing when you think about it] will do its
darndest to cover over Biden's brush with
legality and that of one of his sons [proper for the latter] while
hypocritically and unjustly expending every effort and unlimited funds
to dig deep to find any whiff of imperfection from Sarah Palin and her
family, no
matter how many decades ago, that can be
turned into a frenzy to force her to resign from her candidacy. Good
luck as they say! This woman has élan, a natural style that the
media
would not know how to create if their livelihood depended on it, and
moxie. Lots of it! And she knows that a baby is a baby. She has no need
for euphemisms. How refreshing. I am sure she isn't perfect because she
hasn't died and been canonized. She is in all probability a sinner,
along with the rest of us. And unlike the mediacrats who consider
themselves elitely pristine, she likely knows this, too. Beneath her
confident, no-holds-barred exterior beats a heart of golden humility!
Sarah Palin has put fear in the bellies of liberalism! Their spokesmen
claim that she is a bad choice. Hmmm? I smell a rat or a big
whopper! If Sarah Palin is so bad for the GOP, then how come the
Dem-lemmings are
doing everything below the belt within their power to undo her? Seems
to me, that when a rabid liberal chooses another ultra-liberal for his
running mate, the wise thing to do for a conservative with bona fides,
is to just sit back and enjoy the
downfall. Should not the Democrats be doing the same, if they really
believe her to be bad for the Republican ticket? Since when does the
liberal establishment which runs things in America care about the
welfare of the Grand Old Party? Oh, never since I have been around.
A long time is that. Translation "We have a serious problem, let's nip
it in the bud." Biden
can't hold a drop of dried wax to Palin's bright flaming candle. He has
heat, but no warmth because the place he is in is very dark, a blighted
Catholic conscience. She has warmth, and light although her parents
took her out of the Catholic Church as a young girl! Ergo
the frenzied assault. It has been years since I have enjoyed a
political convention. Tonight ought to be real change we can count on
for once. Some time for FOX News if I can take the unmentionable
products advertised.
Thank you, and God bless you Sarah Palin for consenting to expose
yourself to dirty rotten tactics for the sake of our country. I will
pray for you and your family every day.
Meanwhile time for a little C and C, compare and contrast, shall we,
folks? Or B and A, for Before and After.
Let's see now, where to begin, political events have not been this
engaging for quite some time.
Hmmm! Okay, let's start with Biden. He is known to have a personal
character flaw. He is running for Veep. McCain, who is a Presidential
candidate has the same flaw.
Before Biden: Full throttle mention of McCain's.
After Biden: The media has Alzheimers, a sudden case at that.
Before Palin: Experience did not matter for a Presidential candidate as
long as the candidate is their darling.
After Palin, who is up
for VP: Experience matters more than anything except of course, a
scandal even if it has to be manufactured through hype and piling it on.
Query: If experience is not so essential for the top spot, why is it
sine qua non for the second?
Query Follow-up: If her
relative foreign policy inexperience is so paramount, why not just let
her self-destruct by herself and take down the GOP and let Obama sweep
into office?
I mean, and I trust I am being clear here, if Obama can have on the job
training as President, cannot Sarah Palin have it as Vice-President?
Apples and oranges, and all the stuff that has given politics a bad
name. Insulting to one's intelligence.
Before Palin: A teenage
daughter who [in the future] was found to be with child [an unwanted
pregnancy to the abortion lobby] would be sent down to PP for a little
procedure in order to correct "the mistake" which would be a
"punishment" if not performed.
After Palin: A teenage
daughter is actually with child before marriage [which will take place
we are told] and this is so much more than "a mistake", it is a sin,
caused
not by concupiscence, in the throes of passion, unexpectedly, perhaps,
but by Sarah Palin herself because she promotes abstinence.
In other words, no parents can be against anything unless they are
assured that their children are canonized saints at birth. This is
absurd. One paper of record went so far as to lay the blame not on
human nature in its weaker moments---oh no, is is because of Sarah
Palin's policy stance on
"sex" education.
Hmmm! Seems to me I recall a number of young girls in the same plight
in these environs, everyone of them students in good standing of PP
instruction in the local government schools. So how come, that policy
is not to blame?
The want it both ways virus is catching to the point we have an
epidemic on our hands.
Sarah Palin has lit a torch for the USA, let the debate be robust and
our spirits elevated! The sun seldom sets on Alaska and now we see one
reason why, poetically speaking.
Up with Alaska! Here's to the sanctity of life!
The Biden Heresy September 7, 2008
In a cynical and reprehensible attempt to salve his conscience and lure
Catholics to the Democratic ticket, VP candidate Joe Biden has been
muddying the waters on television news. It isn't enough that 49% of
"Catholics" polled are in the Obama-Biden camp to their shame, this
Judas wants the other 51% or as many as he can to swallow the bilge he
is handing out.
The opinions of individual theologians are not pertinent here, because
the theologian he cites to back up his stance of "not imposing my
beliefs" was also the same theologian who wasn't certain about the
Immaculate Conception. Does this mean that Biden now says there is no
Immaculate Conception? I hope not, for the sake of his soul.
Anyway, it is accepted that if the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception
had been declared in his time, he, as always a great Saint does, would
have deferred to the Church. He did on abortion.
Sen. Biden, can you name me one Saint who thought as you do and allowed
himself to persuade others publicly? I am only asking for one. Well, am
waiting ...
It is the Church that defines revealed doctrine through the Holy
Spirit. The Church has always taught that at the moment of conception
the human life is a person worthy of protection in the womb. Period,
Sen. Biden! Your first duty is to save your soul, even above that of
serving your country.
Your second duty is to not impose your heretical views onto others who
may not have good bishops and priests to instruct them and are thereby
easy prey. We are our brother's keeper, per Ezekiel.
Ensoulment does not have to be seen or physically recorded for me,
because a human life or person, has a soul, the body and soul are
joined until death. Even a dead person is still treated as a person
after his soul is gone. We say dead person and have burial rites in
accord with human dignity. Medically he may be a cadaver as a fetus is
regarding the unborn baby, but by the natural law we say dead person,
not cadaver. You would will that a tiny helpless life has not even this
dignity!
The Church teaches, and I quote from the CONCISE CATHOLIC DICTIONARY,
which carries a 1943 Imprimatur that guarantees it is free of error,
that the Soul is:
The immaterial and immortal principle which is the substantial form of
the body ...
Now, since the soul is immaterial or cannot be seen, there is no way to
observe it as such. A body that has living, growing cells is by
definition alive or animated which comes from anima, the Latin for
soul, the substantial form of its bodily existence.
You are not only obligated to form your conscience with the mind of the
Church in accord with Apostolic teachings but all those that are
applications of that body of doctrine. The truth cannot change, no
matter who says it can.
The same sort of Catholic in public life who says he can't impose his
beliefs in re
abortion is the very same Catholic who has no compunction about doing
it on lesser matters. Mario Cuomo: abortion versus the death penalty in
New York. I need say no more as the hypocrisy, the shibboleth speaks
for itself most boldly.
Actually the Church is not asking you to impose beliefs of any kind,
but to uphold the natural law, as is it the duty of every person of
every background who has reached the age of reason. For instance, it is
against the natural law to steal. We don't insist that every citizen
believe in his heart that it is a sin to rob banks, but we expect him
to conduct himself in a way that protects others' rights under the
natural law.
We impose restrictions on actions in many areas of life for the sake of
the common good. One of the principles of the common good is that when
in doubt don't. If a police officer is not sure that an innocent person
may be in the way of a bullet he does not fire his gun without some
assurance of probability. Innocent life is above all. The right to life
the first and most signatory right.
I will accept that you truly think you do not know when life begins or
ensoulment. This is not germane at all. It is not when in your
opinion, no matter how sincerely you hold it, that is cogent to the
argument. It is what does the Church teach?
That is plenty good enough for me. For the Church, in her official
pronouncements cannot err, when she teaches universally and binds one's
conscience. My personal opinion is that I have no opinion but what the
Church binds me to in this matter. I have no right to an opinion
morally speaking. Even as a doctor, a lawyer, anything at all.
I have mentioned the natural law. It is called such because it inheres
to our common human nature across all centuries, all cultures, it is
the Divine law written into the hearts of men. Now, while the Church is
the special guardian of the natural law as she is the one True Church
founded by Christ for the salvation of souls, the natural law was in
Adam and Eve. Otherwise they could not have been guilty of sin. Cain
slew Abel out of jealousy and was guilty of murder. No Catholic Church
then, No Judaism, no formal religious body as we know it. As long as
there is a human being alive on earth there will be the natural law.
The Church teaches, and until recently, that is, before the PC era,
mankind itself, that the natural law cannot be abrogated. The Nuremberg
trials were all about the natural law when all was said and done.
Not only are we bound to uphold the natural law, which includes the
inviolate nature of the life in the womb [civil authorities refusing to
execute women with child, for example], we have a positive duty to
overturn and or work towards overturning any law that violates the
natural law; there are no exceptions. The Church has pronounced that
any law that violates the natural law is null and void by definition.
See Pope John Paul II's writings on the sanctity of life.
Senator Biden, I will pray for you, that you will look deeply into your
soul, and use all of its faculties properly. That you consult with the
Vatican Signatura that has just released a document on conscience and
abortion.
I love you enough as my brother in Christ to follow the Scripture and
the Church, that dictates I must warn my brother when he is in danger
of losing his soul. You may not know when a human being gets a soul,
what really concerns me is your eternal happiness, your soul. If you do
not know if the life in the womb is a baby or not, why risk killing it?
You are either confused or a willing dupe of the culture of death and
its adherents and evangelizers. We are instructed to choose life or
death.
I know what I choose. If you side with the pro-abortion people you are
choosing death, imposing a death sentence on those who cannot choose
for themselves, and then it won't be a matter of when you received
your soul, because your soul will be dead as in graceless.
You claim to want to save our country [the world] along side of Obama,
yet care not enough
about your immortal soul, which is precious beyond the telling! Count
on my prayers that you will wake up in time and repent and retract the
public scandal you are causing. No man knows the hour of his death. No
office is worth the loss of Heaven, ever ...
Voting: Consensus and Conscience September 21, 2008
Catholic Tradition continues to receive e-mails from regular visitors
who either have joined the consensus of voting for the lesser of two
evils or sitting out the presidential election while voting on local
issues and races. Some of you have opted for a protest write-in vote.
This web master is urged to do one or the other.
Some considerations to ponder as we pray for Divine guidance:
We have no dogmatic authoritative declaration [infallible] from the
Church that binds in conscience apart from the opinions of individual
priests and or bishops on such issues, with the exception of the
sanctity of life, which is authoritative and infallible. No two
situations are the same. None of us should be binding one another under
pain of sin. We do not have such authority over one another. We are
free to express our opinions, however. Even the sanctity of life
provides a conundrum because many so-called pro-life candidates are
less than 100 percent. And if 100 percent, they cannot guarantee
success since they always seem to be in the minority and outvoted in
the state houses and in Washington. One priestly order has an article
instructing us on the evil of voting for the lesser of two evils, to
complicate matters for those with sensitive consciences.
First and foremost we need citizens with virtue who are sanctifying
themselves, not fast-thinking politicians with rhetoric and ideas about
which they are ill-equipped to address, particularly those areas of
public life that are not their domain constitutionally speaking. The
President has little to do with the economy, that is Congress'
bailiwick, however past the bounds of good government it tends these
days. Arguing over the economy renders abortion a back seat on the bus,
which plays right into Obama's hand. And the stupid Republicans are
dealing the hand for him. It is beyond pathetic. If we were virtuous
enough, on the whole, the politics would take care of themselves by
definition. This mess is first and foremost of our own doing.
I have another approach I have not seen discussed in Catholic circles,
at least not that I am aware of: our system of federal elections. We do
not elect by popular vote but by the electoral college process. Most
states are all or nothing jurisdictions---the popular vote determines
all the electoral votes, while some are proportional in nature, so
every vote counts crucially in theory at least.
For instance, I live in the state of Maine, one of two states that uses
the proportional method. The
other state is Nebraska. In these states, there may be be a split of
electoral votes among candidates through each state's system for
proportional allocation of votes. How? Maine has four electoral votes
and two Congressional districts. It awards one electoral vote per
Congressional district and two by the state-wide, "at-large" vote. It
is possible for Candidate A to win the first district and receive one
electoral vote, Candidate B to win the second district and receive one
electoral vote, and Candidate C, who finished a close second in both
the first and second districts, to win the two at-large electoral
votes. This is only what is possible; in Maine this has rarely happened
at all. It is unlikely to be the case again as Obama has a substantial
lead in both districts, in effect an all or nothing state pragmatically
speaking this year at least.
For those of you who live in the other 48 "all or nothing" states, it
depends on the lead going into the election. Your vote may be null and
void before you vote unless it is with the majority vote of a large
enough lead to prevent any last minute upset. Let us go back to Maine.
Since Obama's margin is a winning margin by any method of calculation,
voting for the lesser of two evils, McCain, is a waste of time as Obama
will take all of the Maine electoral college votes barring Divine
intervention, whether anyone likes it or not. Any Maine Catholic who is
torn about what to do in conscience can be assured that if he chooses
to do a protest vote or not fill in the slot for President he has not
failed in his Catholic duty. If the polls show a tightening of the race
by some miracle come November 4th, then he will have to struggle with
what to do. Since Maine is a liberal state by and large---its national
Republicans tend to be as liberal as the Democrats with few
exceptions---the latter possibility is remote.
For those of you who are not sure what to do, first, consider you may
not even have to do anything at all because we do not elect the
President and Vice-President by popular vote. Let us say state A is a
squeaker and Obama wins by one vote that is not disputed because there
is no malfunction of the voting technology. He wins all the electoral
college [in theory the electors can switch sides with some limitations
in some states] in practice. In state A every vote counted so one may
have felt duty bound to "hold one's nose" and vote for McCain. The loss
by one vote does not count toward the election in the other states,
that is, does not have a cumulative effect on the grand tally, popular
vote wise. The presidential vote tally belongs only to the state. In
state B also all or nothing, McCain makes it by a slender margin; in
this state there is voter fraud suspicion, machine breakdowns and all
the rest of the election nightmare of 2000. Even this is fraught by the
American penchant for contrariness and making problems in order to have
a reason to solve them with some draconian method. You see, thanks to
the liberal bullies who have no ethics and the sheer laziness and
pusillanimity of Republicans we have a special deal breaker in play,
reserved voters who decide the close election. Not only is this
solution voter fraud it is designed by Hell itself. How do I mean? It
works like this. Illegal aliens, dead people in the guise of a cheating
citizenry and those not legally registered to vote for whatever reason
are put on hold when they show up at the polls, if they are caught in
the first place. They are used as licit voters later if needed. Imagine
this!! In some states, called "swing states" the election is close, so
close it cannot be called until after the election. Imagine a bunch of
illegals deciding for you and me!! Supposedly they are to be weeded
out, but they weren't in California a few years ago and it is accepted
now in some border states that they will be voting and we just have to
get used to it. Cheating is a way of life now on all levels of social
and political life. Just look at all the outright lies both parties
tell in order to get elected. We are expected to wink at this sordid
state of misaffairs. Since the government is the major means of theft,
getting to be a member of the robber team dictates that ruthless
practices will be in operation because the financial stakes are so
high. Even the honest ones are not so honest latter as we have sadly
learned. They almost begin backsliding on their promises before the
election is held, whatever they think it will take to win. This means
they think we are for sale, and they may be right.
You may be holding your nose for a pittance that is further reduced by
out and out voter fraud. I am not saying don't vote, but if your
conscience is really torn, unless you think your state is more honest
in its practices and the race is very close, you may be sullying
yourself for nothing, if "holding your nose" is your choice.
However you choose, it is none of my business and I won't be telling
you that you are are wrong, provided you are not voting for a
"pro-choice"
candidate or one who favors "gay marriage", etc.
The Congressional races are more crucial because each representative
and senator will be voting on the infamous "Freedom of Choice Act" in
Congress in 2009. This bill effectively consigns the states to complete
abortion on demand states, whether they like it or not. If McCain wins
and has the courage not to sign the bill, we need to make sure at least
that the bill is veto proof, in that the Congress cannot override his
veto, for example.
Abortion is our national shame and disgrace. It is a blight upon the
land; until we get rid of the holocaust in our midst and make national
reparation for our crime calling out for the vengeance of God, our
economic woes will only get worse. God appears to be leaving us to our
filth, our own iniquity!
Palin: Abortion and the States
RUNNING SCARED OF THE BIG BAD MEDIA? October 2, 2008
Is
it me or has the fire in the belly of Sarah Palin burned out? She
sounds so scripted, right out of the heart of a liberalized Republican.
Asked by CBS' Katie Couric, a liberalized liberal herself about Roe v
Wade
and the Supreme Court, Palin's paltry response was "there has never
been a national consensus ...", the downshot being that abortion
belongs to the states and not the national government. Which impelled
the former Senator of now Obama territory, Pennsylvania, to weigh in
that she should have "said she wasn't running for the Supreme Court
..."
Oh, puleeze! Since when?
There has never been a consensus on anything but we still have policies
of various kinds. Palin used to talk and walk more Catholic than Biden,
but now she talks like the dissenting Catholic who believes that unless
the Catholic people have a consensus, the Pope has no magisterial
authority that binds the conscience.
The only correct answer demonstrating fitness for office as well as
honesty and character is:
"No one has the right to abrogate the natural law, no individual, no
state, no court in the land." Period!
Subsidiary does not apply in cases involving the natural law.
It used to be that populists were first and foremost defenders and
upholders of the natural law, all other considerations not withstanding.
This latest disappointment from Palin illustrates how far the mighty
American people have fallen away from God Almighty; we pay lip service
to Him but our real god is our belly.
As the crumbling nation-state is poised to elect as its
commander-in-chief a liar-in-chief, a bigot-in-chief and above all the
advocate of mass murder on a level never before witnessed in human
history, putting even the ancient Aztecs who practiced child sacrifice
to shame, we are reaping what we sowed when we decided to have a
national consensus by tacit understanding that the natural law was
obsolete.
Heaven help us, but I wonder if Heaven is listening to us savage
wretches any longer!
DAY OF INFAMY REDUX
A Reprobate Sense ... Filled with Iniquity
November 10, 2008
"Because that, when they knew God, they have not glorified Him as God,
or given thanks; but became vain in their thoughts, and their foolish
heart was darkened. For professing themselves to be wise, they
became fools. ... Wherefore God gave them up to the desires of
their heart, unto uncleanness, to dishonour their own bodies among
themselves. Who changed the truth of God into a lie; and
worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, Who is
blessed for ever. Amen.
"For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their
women have changed the natural use into that use which is against
nature. And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of
the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men
working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the
recompense which was due to their error. And as they liked not to have
God in their knowledge, God delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to
do those things which are not convenient; Being filled with all
iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness, full of envy,
murder, contention, deceit, malignity, whisperers.
"Detractors,
hateful to God, contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things,
disobedient to parents, 'God delivered them up' ... Not by being author
of their sins, but by withdrawing his grace, and so permitting them, in
punishment of their pride, to fall into those shameful sins.
"Foolish, dissolute, without affection, without fidelity, without
mercy. Who, having known the justice of God, did not understand
that they who do such things, are worthy of death; and not only they
that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them. "
[Romans
1:21-32]
Nothing else can explain the otherwise incomprehensible loss of common
sense and rational deliberation of the voting public. Sarah Palin will
live---if not already---to regret her words, "I trust in the good sense
of the American
people." Which is to question her own. I repeat, mindless optimism is
not a virtue, no matter who says so or how many.
Democracy
is an arduous undertaking fraught with risk if only because it requires
the heroic tasks of
unceasing diligence
and prudence, without regard for sentimentality and the seductive
rashness of the bandwagon by the full majority, which fails to take in
account Original Sin. Too many, in times of uncertainty, not given to
the recognition of the necessary things as they really are, base their
hopes on a chimera
because it makes them think they are "doing something"---what is now a
cliché, "re-arranging the chairs on the Titanic." The blame game
gone awry in the heat of the moment.
Barack Obama, artful dodger, illusionist-supreme
and chief procurer of wanton
slaughter of the innocent and ardent foe of the sanctity of the
traditional family, tin drummer of the unnatural and abnormal, just
vowed to make liberal use of his executive powers and as quickly as
possible. This meglomaniac [I will change the world with your help]
with
the deficient conscience of a budding sociopath and all the charm
inherent in that peculiar pathology captured the imagination of the
vainglorious media, which long ago forsook all pretense to reporting
the news, instead, inserting itself into being a major part of the
news, so
as to influence events in the insolent fashion envisioned [their own
image as gods of celeb], and with it the
masses, who, having abandoned God
with lying lip service, have been abandoned by Him in turn, so that the
light of reason has burned out flicker by flicker.
People say that Obama
just didn't know about: the irreverent Wright; the unrepentant bomber
from Chicago; the
university professor-terrorist supporter; and a homicidal politico
cousin in Kenya. Well, I
respond, the pertinent question is not how much he claims to have not
known, but just exactly is it that these mad men see in him? For it is
certain they know their own efforts in chaos and nihilism; what is it
about Obama
that makes them think they can count on his support and friendship? To
ask is to answer. Even the scuttled Wright was seen out and about
campaigning for Obama the last week when the election was virtually
locked up, preview of coming horrors. Even scuttling isn't what it used
to be anymore, it seems. I suspect that behind the scene the deal was
struck like so many others perhaps? The perennial shell game.
The despisers of
the natural law and
its defenders, the practitioners of contumely residing in Gestapo-like
outposts who disparage and
investigate
unethically those who dare to ask reasonable but inconvenient
questions in order to intimidate, the proud, the haughty and
contemptuous of the common man as
G.K. Chesterton observed in his time also, the inventors of evil deeds
under the cover of media dissembling and double-treating; the
manipulation by money
lenders and usurers to create havoc with which to panic the ignorant
and gullible,
and those who soil themselves with depraved sins of the body and the
crass narcissism to call them rights, God has delivered them up, and
unfortunately the entire country with them. Too easily we set
aside the fact that it was Obama's "Freddie" man who mismanaged affairs
while padding his own pockets,
and the Democratically controlled Congress that lied to the people. Oh,
yes! a chimera, folks, and much worse. Barney wasn't being Frank.
The crowd that cried out for Barabbas on Good Friday will have Barack
on Folly Tuesday, the fawning of the likes of FOX News notwithstanding.
Only Rush has the good sense not to rush to gush. Some conservatives
have asserted that Obama will govern from the center rather than rule
from the left. Do they not know we are so far left that all that is
left is left---there
is only one
party in power, the party of abortion and Sodom backed up by the party
of sort of, we'll wink before we blink: one lane in the road going the
wrong way, with few if any stop signs. [Too many Republicans are no
longer conservatives in the
only way that conservatism matters, in the traditional sense.] And like
their forebears in perfidy, surely
these glory boys know
not what it is they have wrought. Only this time the people
opted for the "savior". And it is "we the people" who will be
"crucified" by our unthinking deed in exchange for some paltry silver,
the gold standard long ago banished along with right reason. Carrying
our cross is not an American attribute, unlike heroics. It doesn't take
courage to bear up in hardship, it requires humility. If only we had
the
grace to be
at
least mortified like Judas. Will we follow him into total perdition by
refusing the mercy of God? How does one ask for the grace of repentance
from a God one denies in deed, if not formal apostasy?
This is the permanent
status of a "democracy"---once a republic---that refuses to acknowledge
the Social Kingship
of Christ, forsaking the Ten Commandments as mere religious and private
preference, substituting non sins as mandatory, dogmatic taboos sine
qua non.
By default, the oligarchic hierarchy in power and its tedious toadies
will serve Mammom instead and enslave us in the process. Make no
mistake there will be imposed a state "religion".
To wit
the following evidence of surrender to insanity and the courtship of
the absurd:
- "I am both pro-life and pro-choice and I am voting for Obama."
---A
member of the Assembly of God church who either did not know or
did not care that Obama campaigned and made common cause with his
socialist cousin, Kenya's Odinga, who took his revenge after
losing an election by having over a thousand Assembly of God adherents
burned alive. I suppose this, too, is being pro-life and pro-"choice".
Like those who turned their backs on slavery. I am personally opposed
to slavery but ... .
- "As a Catholic I am voting for Obama because he will work to
reduce
abortion." The
man who e-mailed has no evidence of any such possibility. In fact, a
quick perusal of Obama's voting record is evidence of the opposite. Any
man who publicly declares that he would get his daughters abortions if
they were pregnant is hardly a man who wants to reduce abortions.
Certainly if this were the case he would at the very least start with
himself as an example. Total
sentimentality and wishful thinking, a luxury a republic that hopes to
remain one, cannot afford. And a "fraudulent" voter if ever I have seen
one.
- "The Catholic Church does not tell you how to vote or who to vote
for."
This was from the pulpit the same day the ordinary of the diocese made
it crystal clear that the Catholic has an obligation to form his
conscience with the mind of the Church, which includes the principle
that abortion is paramount over that of the death penalty and other
"issues". True, the Church does not say
vote for so and so. But it most certainly tells you how to vote, that
is, the foremost considerations which automatically disqualify a
candidate. The parishioners felt free to vote for Obama and
did so in the same number as those who did not. The sin of scandal at
the very least.
- Obama's election "is a great step for humanity, a sign that in
the
United States the issue of race and the problem of discrimination have
been overcome," said Bishop Wilton Gregory. He averred that this could
pave the way for a "Black" pope. As
always the silly season is never out of season, especially
when dealing with liberal-minded bishops who reduce the eternal
verities to
politics. We don't have the first
"Black" president, we have, as far as we know, that is, the first
multi-racial president, as if this is of import to governing. To say
otherwise is to reject and renounce the President's other races, truly
a racist act which perpetuates the very racism decried.
Why not also the 44th White or the first Cherokee Indian? If race means
anything then it must mean everything or else it is overtly and
conscientiously racist. And just what does the US election have to do
with the will of God in
choosing His Vicar? The Holy Ghost guides the election of a
Pontiff and I fear the Third Person of the Blessed Trinity is far from
electioneering in America as can be because we want it this way.
Ignorance is not bliss. "My people perish for a lack of knowledge." The
Bishop actually thinks that the Holy Ghost
has been waiting for events here so that a "Black" pope can be elected?
I don't know where to begin, blasphemy perhaps? We haven't had an
American pope, a Japanese pope, and so forth, either. So what! It is
the will of God and not one's nationality or skin color that matters.
This election of the 44th president is historic indeed, but not for the
reason hailed. Having once elected an adulter-in-chief, with no shame
in plain sight, we have at last graduated from the self-indulgent and
opportunistic to open liability---the messianic.
Of
course, knowledge alone is not bliss, although it has the
potential for raw power. Knowing the good does not guarantee one's
wanting to obtain it. A people which no longer expects virtue of itself
[widespread cheating in school by deliberately dumbing down
the curriculum, passing with failing grades, and on one's
résumé, for instance] are in no position to demand even a
modest virtue in their elected officials. The fast track to national
socialism and national suicide.
- The same majority that voted for Obama also rejected "gay
marriage" in state referenda. Yet Obama is numero uno
with the "gay pride" sect. Irrationality raised to an art form. Pundits
say, well the people just did not know. How so? Do we not have the
longest spectacle of any country that has "free" elections? Almost two
years! Forget that they are so expensive the amount spent to win the
presidency is the annual budget of some countries, if twenty months or
so is not enough time to read up on a few damning statements by a
candidate, well .... Then the same scribes tell us that the people only
get interested the last month or so. Hmmm? If this is true, and I am
beginning to think it is, then why do we not have a month long campaign
instead? Oh, but that would be too rational. And while we are at
it---all
these rich folks who think we are under-taxed, could donate the funds
they give to the Obamas among us to the federal coffers in our stead.
No, they want the working poor to bear the brunt of the burden in
another form.
To make matters totally laughable and I
write these words almost in tears, there is a so-called conservative
group pushing a "Resistance Pledge". There is a list of items to
promise to resist in the coming regime, all of them on point. However,
there is a glaring problem of omission. The abortion holocaust is not
among them. Until we
rid this land of the stench of cold blood we have no nation worthy of
the name. The
moral has a border, too. I will resist signing the "Resistance Pledge".
The fact that this pledge is so poorly thought out is the ultimate sign
that change for the worst has already come to America. Even those who
ought to know better no longer do.
The eminent Catholic writer, Chris Ferrara has written a trenchant
piece on the election,
"Obama
and
the Laughable Beast" for the REMNANT. He closes his article with
the following lines:
"The current economic crisis is only a foretaste of what is coming.
Unless it undergoes a miraculous metanoia for which every Catholic must
pray, America, mass slayer of the unborn and exporter of "freedom" at
the point of a gun, will pay the ultimate penalty for the divine
contempt it has earned so many times over. And the longer God withholds
that punishment, the greater it will be when it finally arrives."
Amen.
THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT
The War Against the Preborn November 25, 2008
The
war against the preborn, sleeping peacefully in the womb is a war
unlike any other war, both just and unjust. The rules of engagement are
not bound by the natural law of justice or the "laws of insurgence",
the latter case, a war of attrition through terror.
The slaughter of the most innocent among men is a war against reason
itself. In the other kinds of war there is at least one party,
rightly or wrongly, that challenges as the aggressor or defends against
one where there is a long-standing inequity, or some other injustice,
real or perceived. And plenty are the mad men who arise to take ample
advantage of whatever disparity and enmity exist, and wherever.
Terrorists strike the vulnerable and the innocent, for this is
the definition of terrorism at its most elemental level. But the aim is
to bring down a country or an organized group or system within a
country, assumed
to be arrayed against the terrorists, and not to simply destroy the
innocent alone.
The war against the baby nestled in utero is an altogether different
type of war:
1. The goal is to eradicate innocence itself, for the sake of others
who can make no such claim. The obscenely absurd is the means of
demoralization.
2. Only one side of the conflict is allowed regular weaponry, the one
in power already, which has the mass media covering for mass murder,
justifying it at the very least by silence and distortion.
It is often said that as Canada goes, so goes the USA. The theory, now
a fact, began with socialized medicine and then grew full steam with
the advent of political correctness. It used to be that a five-year gap
existed between harsh socio-political reality there and finality here.
No more. The war against the smallest human beings has intensified to
such an extent that the policies of unfair engagement of both countries
have merged into one continental nightmare.
A traditionalist friend from our neighbor to the north keeps me
informed with PC articles and then some. Three especially caught my
eye. The way matters have progressed, compressing time from five years
to perhaps two years is at last outmoded, for it is now instantaneous:
the same week we learn that an American "Catholic" college is now
engaged in removing weapons one by one from the sanctity of life army,
an army of unselfish souls whose weapons to begin with are meager
compared to those of the secular culture --- in other words, slaughter
with special sanction, the good old fashion socialist way [read this
Nazi
atrocities manual], we learn that Catholics with positions have joined
the enemy to silence fellow Catholics, rather than the brutality. Not
only are they complicit in the killing by so doing, they have
undertaken to wage war on another front, of their own volition, that of
killing
reason itself, plain common sense, because at this time they are not
permitted to slay the heralds of truth.
The law of fair use allows a writer to quote brief passages from
published pieces; "brief" is not defined, and appears to be subjective.
Below are passages from the three articles, with online links to the
full story. The problem with such links is that they are often
temporary and quickly go dead unless the web publisher archives them.
The November 24 web edition of the
Calgary
Herald
ran an editorial by Nigel Hannaford, titled, "U of C Should say what it
really fears from pro-life". According to Hannaford, the University of
Calgary is censoring the speech of pro-lifers. Hannaford suggests
pointedly that the university is no longer interested in the discussion
of ideas but in the suppression of those that are not politically
correct, that is, do not uphold the culture of death essentially. He
does not use this expression but this is the gist of the piece:
"What
are they so afraid of at the University of Calgary? Or at the Ministry
of Advanced Education? Does nobody have an appetite for a simple
disagreement any more, that a censorship fight should be shaping up at
the university and the only people who seem to be showing any
intestinal fortitude are a handful of students belonging to the Campus
Pro-Life Club?
"Perhaps we should no longer be surprised people
who think abortion is a dreadful thing, expect hostility. The
newspapers have been full of it.
"Still, one tries to hope that
universities remain places where young people encounter new ideas,
challenge old bromides and discover for themselves what they really
think --- that whole liberal education thing that is supposed to
distinguish a university from a diploma mill. But, as the pro-life club
tries once more to bring to campus its Genocide Awareness Project ---
an
admittedly disturbing collection of images from the abortion
industry --- nobody's making it easy to believe that. ...
"The closest the university came to
explaining itself was that it 'is taking steps to limit the risk of a
confrontation on campus,' which seems a tad disingenuous. If it's a
riot
they're worried about, it didn't happen the first five times --- unless
you call some heated arguments a riot --- so why would it expect one
Wednesday, when the pro-life kids want to set up their display? And if
someone did start throwing the exhibits around, who should be
restrained --- that person, or the people with the display?
"Even
so, earlier this year the university served some of its students with a
notice pursuant to the Petty Trespass Act in a bid to shut them down.
Questioned now, they stonewall: 'It's a legal matter.'"
Right. And so it was in res the Holocaust of the Jews. No challenges
permitted OVER THERE.
In America I recall vividly the pictures we little children
were shown of the atrocities, so horrid that I still have nightmares
sometimes, and I am an old woman. People at the time were aghast that
youngsters were shown the pictures; those who did persist, in order
that "it wouldn't happen again" succeeded until the present day milieu.
Only an embittered imbecile would deny
the Holocaust today. The same type of people who showed those images of
brutality, the inhumane treatment of others deemed less than worthy of
protection of the law, are in the forefront of demanding that
pro-lifers not show the reality of what an abortion actually does. Not
only is this intellectually dishonest or hypocritical, it reveals that
the purveyors of the culture of death know the powerful impact of truth
in living color or stark black and white. It's not as easy to deny the
truth in this form as it is
words alone. In other words, the people who claim they are for "choice"
do not want the polity to have a choice of information so they can
exercise their freedom of choice by choosing rightly, which negates the
need for choice at all.
In a second editorial, part 2 of the first, Mr. Hannaford had
this to say about the University's insistence that the signs had to
point one way versus another so as to afford viewing the images a more
difficult, if not impossible task, PC run amok:
"Let's
just talk about this business of which way the signs are to point ---
in
or out. The argument for turning them in is so people who don't want to
see them, don't have to.
"Sounds reasonable, but is it?
"What's wrong with just walking by, as many people do when confronted
with something they don't like?
"Obviously
nothing. I am reminded of a scene in the film depicting the life of
antislavery crusader William Wilberforce, (Amazing Grace), when he
obliged a party of influential Londoners to actually look at a slave
ship: People for whom forced labour in the colonies hadn't been an
issue, now found they could no longer ignore it. Same idea.
"Sometimes,
when one is trying to figure out what's going on, one just has to apply
the reasonable-man test. We all know those who stand against
abortion,
... know the force of their arguments will be met by the
argument of force.
"By their consistent, relentless opposition to
having this display on campus, and by what appears to me as
communications intended to conceal rather than illuminate, the
University of Calgary has defined itself as a censor. These kids, like
'em or not, want to take their stand and the university is against
them.
"Just
in case there was any doubt, last month they got a legal letter,
warning them to turn their signs in --- or risk 'arrest, fines or a
civil
lawsuit for damages. University students among CPL (Campus Pro-Life)
protesters will also be subject to appropriate discipline for
non-academic misconduct, including suspension or expulsion.'
"According
to protest leader Leah Hallman, they're going ahead anyway tomorrow,
signs pointing out. There's no point in a protest people can't see."
Precisely.
See what I mean about the war against reason? It is
now impolitic to want common sense to prevail. Only irrationality is
considered reasonable. Bravo for the courageous students, unlike the
cowardly prelates below. PC alive and kicking, but not the babies being
butchered.
A third article, by Jennifer Wiley, titled, "Little truck of horrors"
was featured on the Calgary
FAST
FORWARD WEEKLY web site, August 9. It was subtitled: "Catholic
bishop brands abortion road show 'a violation of human dignity'".
You are reading this correctly, folks.
She writes:
"The pro-life group that yesterday deployed a box-body truck baring
giant images of aborted fetuses has been disowned by one of the city's
top spiritual leaders. Bishop Fred Henry has branded the images 'a
violation of human dignity' and has withdrawn his support of the
Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform
(CCBR), which launched the
Reproductive Choice Campaign to show the public what they call the
'horrors of tax-funded abortion.'
"In
a Canadian first, the truck, plastered with photos of miniature bodies
covered in blood, was due to take to the streets, stepping up a battle
that is normally heavily supported by the Catholic Church.
"However,
Bishop Henry, who opposes the group's use of graphic images, sent a
letter earlier this year to all Catholic schools, churches and Knights
of Columbus chapters stating he was withdrawing his support of the
organization. In it he said: 'In no way may these pictures be construed
as healing, nor can the project be described as "tough love," and I am
not in favour of this kind of pedagogy (teaching). In my opinion it
does more harm than good to the pro-life cause.'
"The move came as a
shock to the CCBR, which relies heavily on support from Catholic
parishioners, but the organization was undeterred. For an indefinite
amount of time, Calgary drivers may see the truck with its images of
torn-apart, blood-soaked torsos and miniature limbs. The images are
juxtaposed with the word 'choice,' in a carefully designed plan to
bring the abortion debate back into the mainstream media."
Note
the Bishop Henrys of this world have no problem with showing the bodies
of dead Jews also considered sub-human and the realty of war in
Iraq.
Now let us look at the American Catholic scene,
insanity compounded by sheer stupidity:
According to
LifeSiteNews,
"Gonzaga University, a prominent Catholic college, is coming under fire
for twice denying a pro-life group the ability to run a pro-life
advertisement in the student newspaper. Human Life Alliance expects
secular colleges to give it trouble but is disgruntled that Gonzaga
won't allow the 12-page supplement to appear.
"Joe Langfeld, the deputy director for the Minnesota-based pro-life
group that has educated millions of college students with its
materials, talked about the problems.
"We're saddened to learn Gonzaga University, a Catholic school, has
refused to accept 'We Know Better Now,' our pro-life advertising
supplement for 'The Gonzaga Bulletin,'" he said.
"Langfeld told LifeNews.com that, when asked about the reasons for
rejecting the ad supplement, he was told that it was rejected because
it spoke negatively about pro-abortion groups." ...
"Of course some statements in our publication are objectionable to
'various organizations or individuals.' We present documented truth
about the largest abortion chain in the nation, Planned Parenthood," he
said.
"The business of abortion is ugly and we think college and university
students have a right to read the facts from someone other then
abortion providers," he added.
"As a non-profit organization dedicated to educating students on the
humanity of the pre-born child and gruesome realities of abortion we
use college newspapers to reach 19-24 year-olds who are the number one
age group of abortion participants," Langfeld concluded."
Exactly. Under the pretense of expanding
rights, such as the spurious right of "choice" Gonzaga is about the
dirty business of covering up the awful, inconvenient truth of what
happens in an abortion, and to accomplish this the dark powers that be
are curtailing
rights. See what I mean about the war against reason? If teenage girls
are old enough for an abortion, are not they also mature enough to
decide based on facts?
The plain truth
speaks for itself and this is what the enemies of life, including some
prominently placed Churchmen are really afraid of.
John Vennari of
CATHOLIC FAMILY NEWS, has a link to a revealing story about the
Canadian Bishops lack of pro-life support for 20 years! You can read it
HERE.
Meanwhile the
Obamarama in the media continues unabated in full swing and growing.
While the government is printing millions and soon billions of
counterfeit bucks --- no gold or precious metal to back them up ---
pretending that it is not robbing the worker of his pay by deflating
the value of his hard-won dollar, and Obama poised to seize control of
all things within his clutches concerning the economy, the American
people are being given the big chill or silent treatment; no one except
a few Catholics are talking about the biggest takeover of all, the
infiltration of the pro-Sodomites and the abortion lobby in policy
heretofore unimaginable. Again, Vennari provides invaluable links
documenting it all:
•
Obama
Reveals His Radical Pro-Homosexual Policy
•
Barack
Obama Consulted Repeatedly
•
Obama
Selecting the Most Anti-Life, Anti-Family Radicals He Can Find for
Administration
We Americans are in for quite a ride, the descent into Hell on
earth. If you think the protests by the Sodomites in California are
scary, and their getting away with it including in churches, just wait
until the Obama regime takes over. The rules of engagement for PC will
have to be rewritten to configure the loss of reason and our God-given
rights. The major media will not keep us accurately informed, if at
all, until the inevitable fait accompli.
This is the real breaking news story, not the unconstitutional
printing of bogus bucks, old hat by now for America, which has adopted
all the errors of Russia in our unique way of telling lies as if they
are true in soaring rhetoric in lieu of guns and tanks.
Many thanks to WynMarie of Calgary who keeps abreast of
breaking news for all of us here in the US and John Vennari, defender
of the realm of Christendom.
THIS IS A CHRISTMAS TREE, GET OVER IT---GET A LIFE! December 11,
2008 A.D.
It is that time of year again, time for our annual countdown of the war
against Jesus Christ, Our Savior. The assorted and sordid secularists
and their allies never rest in devising schemes to
eviscerate Truth from their midst, as if they own the public square
which is becoming a swirling sewer of impious provocation. This year it
is impossible to award the most extreme or most offensive, although a
sodomite "crèche" in the Netherlands---how aptly named---is a
close
runner-up. The blasphemies and impieties are so outlandish they are
superfluous by the standards of this motley crew of unhappy, miserable
creatures who have nothing better to do, it seems, than rail against
the only name by which they may be saved, Jesus. We will continue to
pray for their salvation; they are beyond mere human help of any
kind.
The theme for the year of our Lord, 2008, a watershed year to be sure,
is a non-religious symbol that is already being banned in some quarters
as offensive, the Christmas Tree, even if someone says its is only a
"holiday" tree. The situation is beyond sardonic and laughable. First
the principalities and powers told us we had to accept the tree in lieu
of the manger because the
sight of the image of the Infant Savior was just too much for modern
sensibilities of "tolerance"! Never mind that tree is not religious, in
of itself; those of us Christians who do decorate with a fir tree and
lights do so, as a backdrop or adjunct for the nativity scene, without
which Christmas is bereft of its reason. Now they are telling us that
the tree itself must go at the library at the University of North
Carolina. In some libraries, such as our public library here, we can
have any religious symbol the public deems except for the
crèche. This
means it is not religion that offends per se, but which one.
Apparently the tree, sans
manger, is still too "religious", that is, "too Christian" for some.
This would be bad enough, but some Catholics are imbibing of the
sacrilegious spirit of the age, to the point of being besotted. In a
discussion on FOX News one Catholic commentator regaled his audience
with his insipid ideas, to wit, that he did not mind that Christmas
plays were banned because he believed in tolerance, that is to say,
that other religions had rights, too. He failed to explain why this
demands the banishment of Christmas. After all, does not tolerance mean
exactly this? No, we all know what is meant by tolerance and it is
anything but. This man is on the verge of losing his soul, he has
already lost his head.
By now we all know about the scandal in the state of Washington. I have
only one set of questions for the so-called Catholic governor: Is not
Christmas
a federal holiday? Would you permit ingrates and malcontents to insist
on an anti-Thanksgiving display on public grounds at Thanksgiving time?
Of course, not, because there is never any such display of
mean-spiritedness. Would you agree to allow the peaceniks to put up
large anti-military posters in the Veteran's Day parade? Of course not.
These national holidays are held in reverence and no one is permitted
to
molest the celebration, although protesters may proclaim their spite
elsewhere at other times. Of all the US holidays, the one most sacred
of all, is the only one that is desacrilized and in the most cruel
manner. Governor Gregoire [I cringe at the sound of such a French
name], why are not the sensitivities of devout Christians taken into
account, and only the sensitivities of others? Do you not know that you
will have to account to Almighty God for your service in office?
To quote another Catholic, whose name I do not know:
THIS IS A CHRISTMAS TREE, NOTHING ELSE.
This is NOT a Holiday Tree
This is a Christmas tree.
It is not a Hanukkah bush,
It is not an Allah plant,
It is not a Kawanza shrub
It is not a Holiday hedge.
It is a Christmas tree.
Say it... CHRISTmas , CHRISTmas , CHRISTmas
Yes. CHRISTmas - celebrating
The Birth of Jesus Christ!!!
If this offends you...too bad.
Get over it ~
Take a stand and pass this on !!
Jesus is the reason for the season... Amen!!!!!
By what right do those with no national holiday of their own disrupt a
federally established holiday of long-tradition? Let the
malcontents and nihilists demonstrate to their hardened hearts content,
in the proper place and time, if necessary. I find it curious and most
telling that only one tradition is so dishonored and relentlessly so.
"Peace on earth to men of good will", not good will to all men.
THE
EFFICACY OF DEVOTION TO THE PRECIOUS BLOOD OF JESUS January 2, 2009
Our
beloved country is in deep trouble, spiritually, morally, financially
and physically. Not only is America now a quasi-official socialist
state, courtesy of George Bush and like-minded powerful people in
Congress, but President-Elect Barak Obama has nominated as head of
Homeland Security a pro-open borders advocate, while the economy
continues to decline, which weakens the will of the people and their
duly elected representatives to think clearly. Everything is in flux
and in constant conflict with one another. Our crumbling nation is on
the fast track to Balkanization and tighter central control. Reason no
longer prevails, for instance, the outcry to stem "global warming" has
not abated although scientists who are not driven by ideology are
forecasting a cooling of the earth in the next twenty years and longer;
indeed, this winter is predicted to be colder than last year. Cheating
and graft are now in the hands of the bold, the brash and the
bottom-feeders of the shame of shamlessness, while authorities seem
befuddled about what to do. At least one federal election appears to be
in the process of being stolen through sheer tenacity and exploitation
of the weakness in our election laws. The press, former watch-dogs of
everyone, and now the ferocious pit-bulls of true conservatives and
phony
conservatives who commit turpitude, now considered a sin that only
conservatives of any stripe merit being denounced for are of little
help to the people. Having created the Obama myth of the new Camelot,
meaning the same old sham Chicago style, will the media have the
insight, the fortitude, and the plain decency to tell us the truth or
will it continue to fabricate and obfuscate in order to prop up their
infamy? Who knows.
Actually all of this degeneracy has been in the works for over a
generation, ever since Roe v. Wade,
when myth outlived legends and replaced the natural law of reason and
truth. We simply saw as through a glass darkly, with shadows. Now the
form of the beast we have engineered is emerging from the dim light of
maybe into the here and now. And what a mighty, terrifying beast it is
when a country loses the grace of God because it prefers to serve the
zeitgeist rather than the only God there is. We all know this down deep
whatever Trojan horses the cultural scions set up for our diversion.
You and I have little say in anything. We are relentless Christians,
traditional Catholics who are barely recognized as being citizens,
other than for the purpose of confiscating our paltry dollars, soon to
be the amero?
We are only passing citizens of this world and this country, our real
home is Heaven, with the grace of God, and while we cannot hope to
reckon with the beast here below, we look to all the power of Heaven
for our sustenance. All things are possible with God for all power and
authority is rightly His. And He is patient and benevolent beyond the
words to tell. All we need is a repentant heart and a firm purpose of
amendment. Let us resolve now and all the tomorrows He has given us to
pray unceasingly not only for our own salvation but the conversion of
this country, its leaders, its new President and his family.
"Our
Lord told Sister Mary
of St. Peter: 'Ask My Father for as many souls as I shed drops of Blood
during My Passion.' By asking for the Precious Blood to be poured out
on
souls we prevent Its being, as it were, spilled out on the ground in
vain.
In His mysterious Providence God has put the salvation of others in our
hands: we must ask for it, and ask fervently and often.
"One of the best means of participating in
the graces and blessings of the Precious Blood is to offer It to the
Eternal
Father. 'An offering,' says Father Faber, is 'more than a prayer.' In
prayer,
we are the recipients, but when we make an offering, God vouchsafes to
accept something from us. St. Mary Magdalen de Pazzi, when in ecstasy,
once exclaimed: 'Every time a creature offers up the Blood by which he
was redeemed, he offers a gift of infinite worth, which can be equaled
by no other.' God revealed the practice of making this offering to this
Saintly Carmelite nun when He complained to her that so little effort
is
made in this world to disarm His Divine justice against sinners."
[Devotion
for the Dying:
MARY'S CALL TO HER LOVING CHILDREN
By Ven. Mother Mary Potter]
We have uploaded a
Precious Blood Directory as an
efficacious and inspiring aid. One of the shortest and easiest prayer
to learn is that of the
APPEAL TO
SAINT JOSEPH.
There is a graphic desktop to download for wide resolution monitors
with the prayer implanted. Please say three Hail Marys and this prayer,
at least every day for the Obamas, America, and ourselves.
I print the prayer here for your convenience:
APPEAL TO ST. JOSEPH
O BLESSED ST. JOSEPH, tenderhearted Father, faithful guardian of Jesus,
chaste spouse, of the Mother of God, I pray and beseech thee to offer
to God the Father, His Divine Son, bathed in Blood on the Cross
for sinners, and through the thrice Holy Name of Jesus, obtain for us
from the Eternal Father, the favor we implore... Amen.
O JOSEPH, foster Father of Jesus, most pure spouse of the Virgin Mary,
pray for us daily to the Son of God, so that, armed with the might of
His grace and loyally fighting the good fight here on earth, we may be
crowned by Him at the hour of our death. Amen.
ASPIRATION TO BE SAID 3 TIMES TO JESUS:
WE BESEECH THEE, therefore, help Thy servants, whom Thou hast redeemed
with Thy Precious Blood.
This is my New year's resolution as a patriotic American. Without
prayer, continual prayer, we can do nothing and can be nothing other
than miserable wretches. With prayer wonders never cease!
A Happy and Holy New Year, spent in the bliss of the sweet ineffable
company of Heaven is profit and prosperity of grace and peace and
contentment and the strength to endure what God may will for us here.
A Holy New Year to all men of good will!
MORAL
CONCEIT AND POLITICAL DECEIT February 13, 2009
One scarcely knows where to begin with such a runaway train of
degradation and demoralization: two weeks of socio-political insanity
that surely must be one for the history books! We will deal with the
least important first and which is the result of the second and primary
matter, the catalyst or seed bed of all our folly.
The old New Deal of myth is back again on the table, dressed up
Chicago-style---the Obama way---to supposedly solve a crisis created by
the very incompetents and ideological mad men who now claim to have the
answer. Nothing new under the sun and nothing new under the cover of
night either. Remember three months ago? Was it only three months ago?
I think in that time I have lived two long, too-long life times. Let's
see now, how did the winning mantra that bedazzled a people given to
circuses go ... Change you can believe or count on ... transparency in
government ... no more lobbyists with revolving door status in
government positions ... you know, all the unBush way of governing, if
campaign rhetoric means anything. Oh, and I almost passed over those
promised tax cuts for everyone with an income of 150 thou a year or
less. All the while promising more programs and more honesty. Well, the
only thing we got were the tax cuts, that is a may be, and only for
those with far lower income than 150 thou, the bracket of the average
medium small business owner, the very backbone of our economic life and
traditional way of managing the means of earning our daily bread. And
of course, what government does best, pork-bellied programs that
guarantee waste, fraud and more taxes in the end.
Let's do the political and moral math, a tax cheat who can't understand
the tax code that we lesser-blessed mortals are required to now heads
the IRS so to speak. His dishonesty is to be overlooked because he is
too important, too brilliant, not to have aboard the gravy train
hurling toward the graveyard.
Too important to fail [to be confirmed], may we put it like this? Then
a series of one tax cheat after another, and or lobbyist, some of them
not so important
as to have to be confirmed, so they fortunately fall by the way side.
Let us briefly look at the most singular of the gang of three, former
Senator Tom Daschle, pro-abortion "Catholic" no less, who almost made
it through to head the Department of "Health" and "Human" Services:
He is on record as saying that it was critical for those in power in
Congress to slip in socialized medicine between the mounds of
unreadable pages of multi-purposed bills, to preclude the possibility
of debate, in other words, impose it on the people without their
knowledge and the dirty deed is nigh impossible to undo. Well, he
failed to pass muster but his ideas have prevailed. For every billion
in the so-called stimulus bill, there is a page of indecipherable text
and as yet not completed for the Congress to read before signing away
what is left of the natural law of reason and our God-given human
rights.
According to Betsy
McCaughey, writing on the Bloomberg News web site, [thanks to John
Vennari of
Catholic Family News for the
original
alert]
"Tragically,
no one from either party is objecting to the health provisions slipped
in without discussion. These provisions reflect the handiwork
of
Tom Daschle, until
recently the nominee to head the Health and Human Services
Department.
Senators
should read these provisions and vote against them because they
are dangerous to your health. (Page numbers refer to
H.R. 1 EH, pdf version).
The bill's
health rules will affect "every individual in the United States" (445,
454, 479). Your medical treatments will be tracked electronically
by a federal system. Having electronic medical records at your
fingertips, easily transferred to a hospital, is beneficial. It
will help avoid duplicate tests and errors.
But the bill
goes further. One new bureaucracy, the National Coordinator of Health
Information Technology, will monitor treatments to make sure
your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate
and cost effective. The goal is to reduce costs and “guide” your
doctor's decisions (442, 446). These provisions in the stimulus
bill are virtually identical to what Daschle prescribed in his
2008 book, "
Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis."
According to
Daschle, doctors have to give up autonomy and "learn to operate less
like solo practitioners."
Keeping
doctors informed of the newest medical findings is important, but
enforcing uniformity goes too far.
New
Penalties
Hospitals and
doctors that are not "meaningful users" of the new system will face
penalties. "Meaningful user" isn't defined in the bill. That will
be left to the
HHS
secretary, who will be empowered to impose "more stringent
measures of meaningful use over time" (511, 518, 540-541) [Emphasis
in bold mine.]
What
penalties will deter your doctor from going beyond the
electronically delivered protocols when your condition is atypical
or you need an experimental treatment? The vagueness is
intentional. In his book, Daschle proposed an appointed body with
vast powers to make the "tough" decisions elected politicians won't
make.
The
stimulus
bill does that, and calls it the Federal Coordinating Council for
Comparative Effectiveness Research (190-192). The goal, Daschle's
book explained, is to slow the development and use of new
medications and technologies because they are driving up costs. He
praises Europeans for being more willing to accept "hopeless diagnoses"
and "forgo experimental treatments," and he chastises Americans for
expecting too much from the health-care system.
Elderly
Hardest Hit
Daschle
says health-care reform "will not be pain free." Seniors should be more
accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating
them. That means the elderly will bear the brunt."
[Ibid.] [
Column
of February 9, 2009]
Government mandated,
ideologically induced rationed health care has nothing to do with
economic stimulus and everything to do with socialism. It's a
stimulus plan for certain, to propel us into a disaster so huge we will
accept the slavery of national socialism for a mere pittance of bread,
given
human nature. And our human nature already diminished by Original Sin
is ever more weakened because we have been lied to and cheated by our
leaders for so long with virtual impunity, that our demoralized state
has left us feeling helpless. Right where these scoundrels with
meglomaniacal visions want us. It's a crime to lie to Congress, but
it's
not one for Congress to lie to the people. And to think there are still
some people who think the world is still right side up. Now we don't
even have to catch them in a lie, because they are so clever about
being sneaky they can tell the truth and only they can fine-tune the
definitions while we learn the truth the hard way, after it is too
late.
Deceit down to a science, forget mere art or common chicanery.
From deceit to moral conceit.
The
talking heads and other assorted denizens of political and social
commentary, you know---the ones who are outraged over mothers driving
without their infants strapped in seat cars, while championing the
right of the same mothers to hire someone else to brutalize their
children in the womb all for a tidy sum, now about to be paid by the
tax-payer if Obama gets the chance---those addle heads. They are all
aghast that an unmarried woman on welfare would have eight babies
implanted in her womb and not have one of them aborted. Now, they
should be concerned, however their anger is not as righteous as it
appears at first blush. After all the heated words are parsed the
matter for them is this: She can't afford the children on her own, so
she should not have had them, eight children is too much for welfare
strapped California. The doctor should have implanted no more than 2 or
3 babies instead, and so forth. Yet these same pundits see nothing
wrong in women conceiving children out of wedlock for the purpose of
conceiving them to raise without fathers. Many of them end up on
welfare. They think it impolitic and most rude if traditional-minded
people raise a stink about deliberately conceiving single
mothers---that is, widows, innocent young women taken advantage of, and
those divorced against their will not included. Their moral conceit
covers a multitude of deceit or sins:
Logically,
if 8 children to one welfare Mom is bad, ought not 1 child for every
eight welfare Moms be equally taxatious? If they all have ADD etc. I
mean, if eight is too much
is not eight still too much? Eight is eight is eight, is it not? And
this is but the beginning of our moral malaise. The Catholic Church has
always taught that a child has a right to have two loving parents, a
mother and a father, [barring
death] who conceive them as an act of love for the glory of God in the
marriage act or willingly adopt children who were naturally conceived;
that no one has an absolute right to any child since children are gifts
from God, not manufactured products from a laboratory. In vitro
fertilization is less a result of technology than it is from the dead
souls
of scientists who accept the abortion mentality and a society that goes
along.
In vitro is a mortal sin. We
know it not anymore, if we ever did. It
is a mortal sin for married couples, too. The "process" as they say,
involves the separation of the marriage act, sometimes through
masturbation itself, and the uniting of the male seed with a woman's
egg, perhaps not even her own, which is not germane actually, which is
now a living human being with a soul, which animates it. Of course
those who promote this evil and unnatural manipulation don't call it
what it actually is. They know down deep it is wrong so they use
euphemisms like embryonic implant instead of baby [an embryo is a
growing baby unborn as yet] and "pregnancy reduction" my personal
favorite. They dare not use the word "abort" or kill. You see not every
baby implanted in the womb of an infertile or unmarried woman lives
long enough to be born. So the Mengeles among us implant 2 or 3 so as
to ensure
a better chance of 1 surviving for birth. Imagine this! Making babies
in a test tube for the purpose of killing some of them to fill the
personal needs and or salve the egos of sick women who need another
kind of
medical and social attention. This is the the direct result of the
unnatural abortion "ethos"---that a child is the property of a woman
until birth and afterwards as long as she does not home school her
child
or if she wants a divorce and wants to use the child to punish the
father.
Dead
souls can no longer reason as they are without the use of reason from
their own perfidy to the natural law. Since they can no longer reason
they are without the ability to understand the connection between raw
expediency in one aspect of life and
death
and expediency in economic and political considerations. If a lie and
deceit serves the one, they will doubly serve the other. The definition
of insanity according to one wag is when someone keeps doing what one
knows will not solve a problem, in order to "solve" it or just do
something because something is needed. Every country that has tried
spending their way out of a crisis has ended in seeing disaster. FDR
did not fix things with his New Deal. He made it worse. People believe
pulp history fiction. Symbols play better than the truth in any era.
Truth-tellers and prophets are disparaged and ostracized, from
Noah on
down. It was the exigency of World War II that turned things
around, not that I am advocating war as a solution. That just happened
to have been the catalyst that time. What will solve our crisis and
national malaise of despair is old fashion honesty,---the unObama
way---that we are in moral trouble first and foremost. That we have to
get down on our pampered spa-treated knees and repent of our sins, of
support and toleration for the evil of abortion and all that follows in
its wake, of unjust warfare, and
our conceit that we are the greatest nation
in the world:
One news magazine calls us all socialists now. Actually we are
much worse, we
are all Idi Amins because we accept butchery by the millions and have
the conceit to call it a right. If we repent, God will once more give
us the grace to become again the greatest nation on earth, which used
to acknowledge His rights in the affairs of men, and our economic woes
will diminish as our humility and dependence on God increases. It is
just this simple and thus, I fear we won't undertake it because we
equate simplicity with stupidity, something stupid people tend to do.
Meanwhile
let us, you and me, continue to pray and convert one soul at a time, if
for no other reason than it is the right thing to do. We are not in
charge, God is, and He is delivering us up to our own iniquity. We get
the leaders we deserve ... Bush was Obama lite, a wanna be
without realizing it and Obama is Bush saturated ... we suffer a
fatal disease of the heart, body and soul.
IT'S
ABORTION, STUPID!
March
26, 2009
They just don't
get it, or do they? The "They" is the Obama regime and their minions in
Congress.
The economy
is ailing because the sanctity of human life is on "life support".
Until we
restore the natural law to its rightful, needful place in the land,
which includes
all the
bishops, not just a couple of handfuls, who do not tolerate abortion
pols in the Communion line, and who will preach against the evil of
contraception, God will continue to withhold right reason from our
leaders in Washington who will continue to be so blind as to continue
on the road to perdition, taking all of us with them. It is just this
simple and just this urgent.
The road to
tyranny is lined with the dead, macerated bodies of the
innocent in the millions. An unholy nation cannot remain whole.
In His mercy,
God is speaking to us in countless ways, the latest of which appears
to be the Montana plane crash that killed 14, including 7 children. The
plane dove into a Catholic cemetery where there is a monument to the
preborn aborted. One of the men who perished was the owner of the
largest abortion chain in the States.
I repeat,
it's abortion stupid! [I don't mean you, viewer, I mean the them in the
"They".]
THE INCOMPARABLE GRACE OF GOD
-----Filed by Pauly Fongemie, March 30, 2009
While
the baleful, contrarian winds of March madness have seized the
frenzied imagination of men who crave power and control---dominance of
conceit and hubris over common sense in the rush to world
socialism---the advent of April brings us showers
of the incomparable grace of God, for those who know where to look and
how to see. Word comes from an internet site that Newt Gingrich,
former US House Speaker and conservative pundit has converted to
Catholicism. All praise and thanksgiving be to Almighty God. Let us
remember Mr. Gingrich in our prayers that he will continue to seek the
light of Christ so that he will come to understand and then promulgate
Catholic social teachings; he has a platform and a voice; let us pray
that it will not be stilled by those who thwart the reign of Christ at
every turn; that he will receive the moral virtues, including the
courage of a martyr if need be.
One of the television networks ran a weekend piece about Secretary of
State Hillary Clinton's unexpected visit to the Shrine of Our Lady of
Guadalupe in Mexico. With God there is no such thing us a coincidence.
All human expectation aside, it is God's prerogative that such events
are provided for. The reporter alluded to her lack of knowledge about
the Blessed Virgin Mary. Not being a Catholic and given the state of
affairs among men today, hardly surprising. But for me this was of no
significance for I saw the beginning of the miracle of grace,
preferring to see with the eyes of faith. There was no missing the
almost seraphic glow on her face as she gazed reverently at the image
of Our Lady and gently, sweetly, left a rose for her. Mrs. Clinton is
well traveled but she has only begun the journey of a lifetime, thanks
be to the incomparable grace of God. Please keep her in your prayers,
not only as the Secretary of State, but for her continued conversion.
She may not know it yet, but the Mediatrix of All Graces has her within
her incomparable Mother's arms.
These wonders should be more than enough for any one person to behold
within a two week period, especially for those of us who are but poor
sinners, lower than a worm---Psalm 21. God in His bountiful goodness
gave a third gift of incomparable grace, this from our Holy Father,
Pope Benedict, who wrote a letter to the Bishops of the world, March
10. Chris Ferrara of THE REMNANT has an inspiring, compelling article
that says it all: you can read it
HERE.
The heart of the letter concerned three aspects: a defense of the
Society of St. Pius X and his action in this regard in the form of a
rebuke to those who are critical of his lifting the "excommunication";
second, the state of the world---citing one paragraph:
In
our
days, when in vast areas of
the world the faith is in danger of dying out like a flame which no
longer has fuel, the overriding priority is to make God present in this
world and to show men and women the way to God…. The real problem at
this moment of our history is that God is disappearing from the
human horizon, and, with the dimming of the light which comes from
God, humanity is losing its
bearings, with increasingly
evident destructive effects.
The
third is what Mr. Ferrara calls in reference to Vatican Council II, "a
clear abandonment at last of the Council's foolhardy 'optimism'
concerning 'the modern world.' "
Let
us rejoice and continue our prayers for the Roman Pontiff and give
thanks and praise to the Blessed Trinity, for the incomparable grace of
our Triune, one and only God!
AN
OBAMANATION!
Black Sunday at South Bend May 18, 2009
Family matters having kept me away
from much of my web duties ----
with the Obama Express to Hell
steamrollering through what is left of common sense, common decency,
and just plain sanity, I know that some of you were expecting this
column to have been updated sooner ---- I decided that the will of
God
provides opportunity in its own good time. And that time is today.
There have been so many outrages that I could have written a dozen
columns in a dozen days if I could have been at my computer for more
than few minutes here and there and not exhausted. Perhaps it is more
fitting that I decided to wait three days longer than originally
necessary, until I heard "Fr." Jenkins, president of the once Catholic
university in South Bend, Indiana, and still audaciously, brazenly
bearing Our Lady's name, and the other president, who, when he applied
for student aid as a young man bore a different last name and country
of origin, that is, applied not as an American citizen, but as a
foreign
student, and who, now, by
media smoke and mirrors and pernicious chicanery holds sway over what
is left of our sovereign land, deliver his much vaunted, awaited
address to the country with the ever expected "soaring rhetoric"
--- that just as expectedly fell flat ---- which he is
supposedly known for. Thus
the title of this piece. An abomination!, or in this case, an
Obamanation! One scarcely knows where to begin for there seems no end
in sight to the spectacle of cowardice, sheer double-talk [lying to
deceive in an earlier,
more honest age], apostasy, heresy, blasphemy, arrogance, self-flattery
rather than self-mastery, the banality of evil on the installment plan,
and crass ignorance and godless ideology marketed as compassion or
empathy. And always the irony, so much a hallmark of the past few
weeks, that one cannot catch one's breath, to think that one would live
long enough to behold such disorder in human affairs. While an
earthquake erupted Sunday in Los Angeles, a greater quake sundered
South Bend, that of de facto
schism, if not as yet de jure status.
Behold the character of such a man,
that he, invited to speak at
another nominal Catholic institution of "lower" [formerly known as
higher] learning, Georgetown
University, the oldest such school in the United States, imagine this!,
and the price he demands for his august majesty's appearance as the
media "anointed one", is that images of Christ and His symbols be
covered with cloth. It was hardly a Good Friday of Tradition! Imagine
that such a man, claiming to be a Christian of some odious liberal
spirit, is so offended by the sight of a representation of Jesus
Christ, that he is driven to extortion of this kind. Imagine and
then behold, even more, the "Jesuits" there complying!!!!! Compare this
with his reverential bow to a Moslem king! There must
be a word in the English lexicon to describe such infamy but a research
team could not find one, for never before has a western nation had the
temerity and folly to conceive even the very idea, let alone its
execution in broad daylight! At least I give the dangerously
incompetent, the charlatan, Obama credit for one authentic and capable
attribute, he knows the lay of the land and the mood of the elite
insisting that they are still Catholic ---- they will cave every
time, and he will
be accorded approval for seizing the moment to insulate himself from
the people at large who are stirring in opposition, by cloaking himself
with the shield of Catholicism's "blessing", having been thrust into
power by 54% of the benighted Catholic people, thanks to all the parish
priests who voted by their side and too many quisling and or craven
bishops still. I would never deny Machiavelli's Prince his due, and
neither will I do so for the "son" of Saul Alinsky and His Rules for
Radicals.... Put
another way, to know Saul Alinsky and his offspring, ACORN &
Company, is to know Obama. The defiant crowd who preferred Barabbas
over Christ on Good Friday, is very much the same
in tone, tenor
and anti-truth to the crowd on Black Sunday who gave us Baraccas who
prefers anyone
but
Christ it seems.
Behold another college in the South,
a non-Catholic one at that, which
does not
confer an honorary degree on his highness! The reason, he had done
nothing to merit one as yet. Common sense peeking around the corners of
the debris of modern desensibilities!
Behold the slumbering ---- apostate
----
university
named for Our Lady on the Leftie side of South Bend, with its nickname,
the "fighting Irish" and which failed to muster a fight worthy of the
name. No university is compelled to invite any specific speaker at
commencement. Indeed, how many local colleges had guest speakers who
did not hold the highest office in the country? Did this fact tarnish
the office of the Presidency? Of course not. Consider that the US
Bishops' policy is that a Catholic institution is to not only not honor
those
who do not uphold the inviolate tenets of the Catholic faith, as well
as the natural law, which is binding on all men and which is written in
their hearts, in their very human nature as men, it is also
forbidden the act of "providing a platform" for such a person. The last
I
checked a dais is a platform. Or has that been reversed by executive
fiat, too? Now behold and consider that not only is our hapless
buccaneer-in-chief being invited to speak to the graduates in order to
inspire them [inspire them???? or confirming them in Catholic dissent
while saving the earth????], he is being feted and lauded with an
honorary law degree. A law degree!!!! He, so infamous for his violation
of the most basic rules of the natural law, so enslaved to ideology,
that he was the only Illinois state senator to vote against a bill that
would have ensured babies who survived abortion medical treatment!!!
The same ideologue who spurned those whom he disagrees with as
"ideologues" in his less than stirring speech centered on
self-justification and basketball, yes basketball, to the fighting
Irish of football fame, after a mere perfunctionary mention of the
"controversy" over his appearance and award. Beyond belief, but so true
to all things Baraccian, he complimented president Jenkins for saying
"what I could have said, but more eloquently". What did he say to
introduce Obama? How wonderful he was although he favors abortion. His
wonderfulness upholds all the left's goals and as supposedly endorsed
by the Catholic Church if we are to decipher the Jenkinsian code of
sloganeering. Obama was being awarded in order to seal the deal with
the harbingers of socialism so favored by the left. And, in other
words, Obama was
thanking Jenkins for praising him, that is, he could have praised
himself!!!! How can anyone who is complicit in mass genocide be
praiseworthy? Am I wrong or do you agree with me that Jenkins and his
treasonous cohorts would not have been so inclined to honor Joseph
Stalin and Adolph Hitler? Just a thought ... Well, okay, maybe Stalin,
but never Hitler who murdered far fewer than Uncle Joe. Duplicity, you
two, all is
duplicity.
Behold and consider the demoralizing
and scandalous spectacle of the
rationale for the honorarium: because he seeks to unite religious and
political factions among other goals, another of which was that he was
the first "African-American" president. Even this is a lie, he might as
well be adulated for being the 45th White or 1st Cherokee Indian as
president. But the hard-core racists among us, who denigrate Caucasians
and Mongolians [American Indians are a subset of the Mongoloid race] in
favor of the superior and preferred race "Black" [Negroid] hope we
won't notice or if we do, that we will not object. The nuns taught us
the definition of racism in the forties and fifties: either the
preference for persons based on race or the preference of a race itself
as superior over that of other races and treating others on this basis.
It was and is a mortal sin. In essence, Obama was awarded in the spirit
of that racism! As far as the unifying force he is supposed to be,
never has the country been more divided and a civil war [soon to be
uncivil] is now beyond control. Oh, not that Obama caused this, he is
merely the most extraordinary synthesis of the great divide, not an
unifier!!! Ironic does not begin to describe the subterfuge at foot.
Alan Keyes, see below, is of the opinion that this degree was pay back
for something worked out behind the scenes or words to that effect. I
would not put it past the Orwellian, thoroughly corrupt powers that be,
the man who pirated the presidency and his motley crew of sychophants,
and most especially, the unseen hand of power behind the ship of state
tossing about on the shoals of perdition.
But even more to the point, the only
true unifier of religion is the
Catholic Church, the only true Church of Jesus Christ. "For I have
other sheep, and them, also I must bring." "Thou art Peter and upon
this rock, I will build My Church." Any other effort to unify outside
of the Church is sheer folly leading to an amalgamation of the spirits
of the age, the worst sort of paganism and meaninglessness which
engenders despair, the very revolution of man's self-will over Truth
itself and the rights of God. Anyone with only a few brain cells
operating can see for himself the sorry results of the modern
ecumenical or maniacal movement as I prefer to call it: mass confusion
over what to believe, a veritable tower of Babel of syncretized dogmas
that serve the powers and principalities of Hell and those beholding to
them here and now. Oh great is the confoundment among men, and great
the disdain for the unity of Truth. Men think of saving themselves by
being saved by human efforts and the new faith or religion has only one
liturgical color, Green! Go Green, unify America! The old paganism
worshipped earth deities among the parthenon of gods.
The new paganism worships the earth
itself. Its high priests and priestesses will brook no dissent on the
meaning of brooks and other natural beings and climatic forces. There
is no one more dogmatic than the man claiming to despise the dogmas of
Catholic Truth and the once true scientific method. No one more
absolute than the man proclaiming there is no more absolute truth, a
self-contradicting claim. This is why the truth of the American
constitution has been gutted slowly over the past few generations until
now no one hardly bothers to question Obama's insistence that his new
Supreme Court Justice's primary qualification is empathy, a code word
for what ever the left wants it to mean, when it wants it to mean what
it wants and why it must mean what it wants it to mean. The old
revolution was the rise of the proletariat, the new revolution is the
rise of the
oligatariat on the court who will do the bidding of the
internationalists to end national sovereignty, a right from almighty
God and an inherent good in of itself. The natural law, now in tattered
shreds, will be finally incinerated. Oh do not weep for a few poor
pro-lifers, disparaged in the media and the halls of power, but weep
for yourselves America, and for your children, the few you choose to
conceive!
Enter stage right, a few days before
the profane proceedings a small
band of stalwart foes of the culture of death, the champions of the
culture of the sanctity of human life, most noteworthy among
them four good men and true: Archbishop
Raymond Burke of the Vatican Signatura, the Supreme Court of the
Church, Ambassador
Alan Keyes and now ambassador-at-large of common sense, Operation
Rescue's gentle lion,
Randall Terry, and the undaunted heroic and holy simplicity of Father
Frank Pavone of Priests for Life.
There was a fifth man, an alumnus of the university in South Bend,
whose name I did not catch who was part of the defenders of the Faith
being interviewed and or arrested for peacefully praying. Norma
McCorvey, who was so cynically and cruelly used in Roe v Wade was also
there and
arrested, but I did not have a chance to hear her speak or be
interviewed. The alum summed it up, when asked by an interviewer on
Fox News why it was so few of the student body were protesting [80%
favored Obama in all his heinous glory]: He was not surprised because
he acknowledged that the college had been undermined from within by
heretic professors and even outright apostasy for years.
Archbishop
Burke, interviewed by EWTN's Raymond Arroyo the Friday before Black
Sunday, said that the Catholic people for more than a generation had
not been properly catechized. In no uncertain terms he laid out Church
policy in order to avoid scandal, Obama should not at the very least
been awarded the law degree and why. I hope he will not be silenced or
prevented from further action by others higher up through a false sense
of their duty in these times. I am a Mainer born and sure, but in
practice I am from Missouri. By their fruits you shall know them.
Alan Keyes, when asked if the use of
dolls in baby carriages covered
with fake blood was an effective means of protest, responded by
witnessing to the truth that when people outraged over lynching and
slavery protested, they showed the real thing in its effects to catch
people's attention. One can only witness to the truth by being as true
and
forthright as holy means allow. A picture is worth a thousand words,
more succinct and
self-explanatory. He spoke of the betrayal of men within the Church. No
holds barred. When asked about the apparent silence of the Vatican, he
answered that the Pope is a head of state and that heads of state tend
not to condemn other heads. And that the Vatican had spoken through
Archbishop Burke. This is the only point on which I differed. Yes, the
Pope is a head of state, but he is first and foremost the Vicar of
Christ and the Shepherd of Souls, including Obama's and Jenkins' souls
ultimately, Catholic or not.
For, as a Protestant family
activist, also interviewed by the same man
on Fox, said, the Catholic Church has always been in the forefront of
morality, even when Protestants were somewhat lagging behind. He did
not use these precise words, but this is what he meant, in capsule
form. Randall Terry, who was interviewed by the same man once again,
said in
his
own way what the Archbishop and ambassador said.
Who was this man from Fox who
interviewed these men? The erstwhile
Catholic, Sean Hannity, who is for abortion in the first three months
of
gestation for rape, incest and life of the mother, for contraception,
and who along with the duped Glenn Beck joined the chorus of betrayal
to support Obama's speech, if not award. Imagine the irony, not to
mention the hypocrisy of the feigned outage of Sean Hannity, when
having these faithful Catholics on his program and "sharing" their
pro-life tenacity! As an aside, having nothing to do with the betrayal
in South Bend with its fawning allegiance to the West Wing, Fox, home
of the Trojan Horse American style, has a new commentator, the former
Republican governor of Arkansas, Huckabee; on one show on "gay
marriage" this so-called student of history, but apparently not the
natural law, said that if the people vote in "gay marriage", well then
that's okay, just so long as the courts don't legislate from the bench.
No one has the right, not even
the people to veto the natural law. This
is why the supposed right is so often a failure, it is more wrong than
right, inarticulate in defending the natural law. And why there so many
former Republicans, myself included.
Another Fox show, a Sunday News
program had two priests as guests that
morning: the heretic Father Richard McBrien and the noble, humble,
Father Frank Pavone. McBrien obfuscated as usual by misquoting out of
context Church teaching and discipline to support Obama's award and
appearance. Why he has not been defrocked by now is a mystery to me,
this is the man who had a scandalous column casting doubt on the
Divinity of Christ and by writing about all of Jesus' "sexual urges".
McBrien is one of the apostate heretics of South Bend the above alum
referred to. He was no match for Father Pavone! Father cut to the
proverbial chase, the matter of the law degree, that Obama is unfit to
receive such an honor because he violated and continues to violate the
natural law in its most elemental form. He focused on the issue of
abortion which was being diminished in the media, quite unwittingly
perhaps. The last is my opinion, Father did not say this, but he wanted
the evil of abortion itself to be front and center, and he accomplished
it for the few minutes of air time he was permitted. Modern electronic
media is not designed to shed light but to bring infernal revenue from
the hucksters of the dark among other merchandisers. Fox hosts condemn
NBC's alliance with GE's move to control medical information in the age
of socialism --------- disingenuously named Healthymagination,
while circulating ads for the same because they want the revenue GE
brings. Beyond hypocrisy! The interviewee is
pressed to finish a sentence before the reporter says, "we have to go"
and on and on it goes. Bravo Father Pavone! You, faithful servant, have
not
prostituted yourself to the American buck soon to be the Amero; your
show on EWTN is not a continual interruption of logic
that needs more than a few minutes to conceptualize in the mind to
fully flower. Noble ideas and beliefs have consequences, and so does
the
diminution of them by such unnatural constructs as the three minute
rude, overly loud commercial interspersed between five minute news
spots.
Behold the three day spectacle of
peaceful protesters, a small handful
in comparison to those who could of and should have joined them if they
had the sensus fidelium of an
elderly priest who was carted away on a stretcher for saying the Rosary
near a banner of Patroness of America, Our Lady of Guadalupe. Imagine a
Catholic institution that calls on the police to round up Janet Reno's
would-be "terrorists" armed with the Holy Rosary and haul them off to
jail like so much unwanted trash. More like inconvenient truth that
might mar the bigger spectacle of perfidy in all its vainglory and
thereby prick the consciences of men who will to have dead souls.
May 17, 2009 is a day that will live
in infamy, like that of January
22, 1973. May is the Month of Our Lady, Notre Dame, and to have her
holy
name associated with such treason and blasphemy is an evil of great
magnitude. The South Bend school should be stripped of all canonical
stature in order to avoid further scandal and the loss of souls. They
can
drape the mantle of esteem and legitimacy on Baraccas, but they cannot
clothe their shame! It is an abomination crying out to Heaven for
redress, an Obamanation crying out for reparation!
IS
IT ALL RIGHT TO REFER TO HIS
MIDDLE NAME OF HUSSEIN, NOW? June 4, 2009
Let's
see now, if we have this correct,
shall we? During the campaign
we were told by the audacious, contemptuous elites in power that it was
racist to ask questions of the future POTUS concerning his Muslim
background. Ann Coulter, who dared to use his middle name of Hussein
was excoriated as a xenophobe and worse. Most Americans, duty bound to
the god of political correctness, forsaking the naturalness of common
sense, obliged with the new regime's regimen of see no Islam, hear no
Islam, know no Islam.
After the fraudulent election Barack
Hussein Obama went abroad in an
attempt to be all things to all, except to devout Christians, that is,
proclaiming that America is not a Christian nation, meaning the
majority of Americans have put aside their Christian morality in the
body politic. Not much argument there, actually, if the Tea Party
participants' complaints are any indication ---- their
grievances were all economic and
those related to personal liberty, not the dissolution of the soul of
America itself, our decline into barbarity and general lawlessness
---- the anarchy of personal amorality
apart from the natural and Divine law. Yet the majority of Americans
identify themselves as Christians and in this sense they were offended
by the insouciance of BHO's proclamation to those who do not
necessarily care much about America. And then the bow before a Muslim
king, whose country abets Jihadists!!!
Back home in the heartland, with the
sting of betrayal still burning,
the anointed, messianic one ["I will change the world"], comes peddling
and backtracking on the Messiah, Jesus Christ, when his aides insist on
the Crucifix being covered when he delivers an address at once Catholic
Georgetown. More contempt, the same sort of self-assured disdain
expressed in his memoir, regarding the Catholic nuns who taught him
briefly back in the days. If only Americans could still read and grasp
what it is they are reading, then maybe November, 2008 would not have
sealed our date with doom.
We are no longer a Christian country
he says, yet seeks out another
Christian school to drape himself with legitimacy in eternal, paternal
campaign mode, being all things to those who ought to know better,
Notre Dame, now our shame.
Yesterday he is once again abroad
aggrandizing his global sway. This
time, he does not bow; last time he insisted it was not a bow, but that
because he is tall and the king is shorter, it was necessary to stoop
to shake his hand. Apparently the Muslim king of a country that
persecutes Christians and women in general, has grown several inches in
two months. And the tag line? Oh, would you just know it is that
---- America with 2/3 of the population
Christian in identity and less than 2% Muslim, why we represent a
Muslim country! Right!
Perhaps this is why BHO nominated a Christ hating-Allah loving federal
judge to the circuit court of appeals. Now, that B. Hussein has
hijacked the presidency, it all comes out, oh how Muslim are his roots
and it seems, his real identity. Muslims despise the Crucifix.
Hey, media spin meisters, you glory
boys and gals of the News-favoring Barack Corporation, the All for
Barack, Corporation, etc., is it okay
now for Ann Coulter to say Barack Hussein
Obama, and for the rest of us, too? After all, the almighty one has
spoken, we are no longer Christian but Muslim ...
UPDATE:
In a speech at Cairo University, B.
Hussein Obama committed utter
blasphemy, saying triumphantly that for hundreds of years, Islam has
been the light of the world!
Jesus Christ is the Light of
the World and there is no other name by which we may be saved!
I am looking for volunteers to say
an extra Rosary a day in reparation,
lest the wrath of Almighty God be increased upon us!
www.catholictradition.org/sounding-off10.htm
BACK----NEXT