Part 1: The Three Fronts in Relation
to
the Events of the Boston Marathon Bombings: An Overview
We will take the last strategy first, acts of barbaric terrorism
to
instill fear and destroy Western resolve, along with any actual loss of
life that may occur. Recall that in an earlier article I referred
briefly to the Muslim student with permission to be here as a
source of mystery; now we know about the deliberate deception by the
government, which has
close ties to the Saudi Arabian government because of its perceived
necessary source of oil and somewhat murky political intrigues. The
Saudi Arabia - chief exporter not only of oil but of wahhabism -
a
militant expression of Islam and font of terrorism. Like the Muslim
Brotherhood in Egypt, America has the uncanny penchant for enabling and
empowering our real enemies. With the Brotherhood there we are footing
the
bill in fact, that's right, people, with your and my taxes.
Here is
the more complete story on this student by way of a follow up for the
week of April 22,
2013: Our source is THE BLAZE television network which is doing heroic
yeoman's work in delving into the charade we are being treated to and
which even the likes of FOX News seems only somewhat interested in
- that
network is too busy paying attention to too many of the
establishment crew of experts, although a couple of the analysts FOX
uses are exemplary. THE BLAZE is the place to be if
you are interested in getting news you can use from television and its
web site. According to THE BLAZE:
A Saudi national - the student who was the first to be said to be
a "person of interest" in the
Boston Marathon bombing was scheduled to be deported under section 212
3B
- "Security and related grounds" - "Terrorist activities" after the
bombing. But shortly thereafter, The Blaze's Chief Content
Officer, Joel
Cheatwood, learned that the government may not deport the Saudi
national, originally identified as Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi. Then the
cover-up began in earnest through the same tried and true techniques,
stall, obfuscate, deny, change stories, anything but the truth:
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano would not answer
questions [surprise, surprise!] on the matter when asked directly about
it by Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-SC) in the House on last Friday. An ICE
official indicated that a separate Saudi national is in custody, but is
"in no way" connected to the bombings. "A congressional source,
however, says that the file on Alharbi was created, that he was
'linked' in some way to the Boston bombings (though it is unclear
how), and that
documents showing all this have been sent to Congress."
Key congressmen of the Committee on Homeland Security had requested a
classified briefing with Napolitano. It looks very much as if she may
have committed perjury. Fox News' Todd Starnes reported
that
"Alharbi was allegedly flagged on a terrorist watch list and granted a
student visa without being properly vetted." But the intrigue is as
insipid as it seems - powered by corrupt members of the administration
who
are engaging in wanton criminal acts, alienated from any sense of the
moral
rectitude this nation used to know it. It is Nixon redux. We now learn
from The Blaze that "Alharbi's file was
altered
early Wednesday evening to disassociate him from the initial charges."
As if this is not enough to raise the alarm, it then came to light that
this Saudi national with important connections had obtained a visa to
live and study in Findley, Ohio, which he then did not do, but rather,
acquired roommates and an apartment in Revere, Massachusetts where he
resided at the time of the Marathon bombings. There is much more, but
we will let this suffice for this report here.
He is not the only strange case. Currently there are 75, 000 students
of doubtful classification on visas in the United States, 15,000 of which are missing, that is, their
status is unknown as to whereabouts or activity. But then, the
older of the two bomber brothers had been flagged as suspect, yet he
was able to travel freely abroad and back into America, even though
Russia had warned our officials that he should be watched. Meanwhile
you and I cannot board a plane without being stripped searched and this
includes little old ladies who are dying and in wheel chairs and
disabled children who are Americans.
Blaze "sources tell us this will most likely now be kicked from the DHS
to the
DOJ and labeled an ongoing investigation that can no longer be
discussed."
On Monday [April 22] Glenn Beck told his audience what "he
knows about the Saudi
connection to the Boston marathon bombings. It is a story that the
mainstream media has all but completely ignored, though Beck says
The Blaze's Chief Content Officer Joel Cheatwood reached out to
numerous
other networks in an effort to get the story out."
To further quote The Blaze:
"But now a number of congressional sources have confirmed that the
story
is as The Blaze reported last week, and Beck is presenting more pieces
of the big picture. 'This week has changed me,' he said at the top of
his radio program on Monday. 'The events in Boston changed me. The
events in Washington around Boston changed me. We crossed an
"extraordinarily disturbing threshold" last week, Beck said, but we
know 'exactly who we're dealing with now.' "
The government's refusal to explain with any credibility is not
new, of course; neither is its underhanded dealings with the Saudis who
appear to be calling the shots, just as they did under George Bush
after 9/11. At that time 140 Saudi nationals were spirited out of the
country to safety abroad without any explanation from our government.
Quoting The Blaze once more, text in bold added by me:
"While the media continues to look at what the causes were of these two
guys, there are, at this hour, three people involved. The first one is
the one we are going to address. Beck proceeded to highlight the
background of the Saudi national first
identified as a person of interest in the Boston bombings, Abdul Rahman
Ali Alharbi, noting that the the NTC issued an event file calling for
his deportation using section 212, 3B which is proven terrorist
activity. We are not sure who actually tagged him, but we know it is
very difficult to charge someone with this it has to be almost certain,
Beck explained. It is the equivalent in civil society of charging
someone with premeditated murder and seeking the death penalty, it is
not thrown around lightly. Beck continued, noting that after Secretary
of State John Kerry met with Saudi Foreign Minister Saud on Tuesday,
the FBI began backtracking on the Saudi national from suspect, to
person of interest, to witness, to victim, to nobody. Then, on
Wednesday, President Obama had a chance encounter with Saudi Foreign
Minister Saud and Saudi Ambassador Adel al-Jubeir Wednesday at 5:35
p.m. the file is altered, Beck said. This is unheard of, this is
impossible in the timeline due to the severity of the charge:. You
don't one day put a 212 3B charge against somebody with deportation,
and then the next day take it off. It would require too
much to do it. There are only two people that could revoke the
deportation order -the director of the NTC could do it after
speaking
with each department, the FBI, the ATC, etc. which is impossible to do
in such a short period of time, or,
somebody at the very highest levels
of the State Department could do it. We don't have any evidence
to tell
you which one did it, Beck said.
"Congressman Duncan is in possession of the original event file along
with other members of the House Homeland Security Committee, and have
sent a formal letter of request (which we have a copy of) to Napolitano
for a classified briefing on the Saudi national and the deportation
order. Beck proceeded to highlight more key points: The Saudi national
was allegedly allegedly- flagged-on-terror-watch-list and granted a
student visa without being properly vetted. If, as an ICE official said
last week, there is actually a second Saudi in custody, who is it? Beck
asked. Why were there were no names, no pictures presented?
"The fact is, an event was created for
one Abdul Rahman Ali AI-Harbi
indicating he was to be deported for terrorism activity related to the
Boston bombing. If this file was created with another Abdul Rahman Ali AI-Harbi in mind,
don't you think we should
know about it? Beck proceeded with more exclusive information; The
Saudi student visa specifically allows him to go to school in Findley, Ohio. He has been in
this country six months ... He
has an apartment in Boston, Massachusetts. If this is a case of
mistaken identity, then who is the person named in the file, with the same name, with the 3B
charge? And If DHS was working
with the person as a source to out the bombers, then why was
there a
3B Charge? Exclusive: Why wasn't the Congressional Committee on Homeland
Security notified?
"Why are they being cut out of all information? This is
protocol. We are
working on the family connections, and there is more to come. Sources
tell us this will most likely now be kicked from the DHS to the DOJ and
labeled an ongoing investigation that can no longer be discussed. This
will be the reason Napolitano won't answer the Homeland Security
Committee's request for a briefing. Like Benghazi they have heavy into
a disinformation campaign floating a variety of scenarios to confuse
the media but that apparently doesn't take much to prevent the story
from being pursued."
Make no mistake, folks, Saudi Arabia, not Al Qaeda, is the real,
purduring source of what ails us on this front, yet we are in bed with
them in more ways than one. The US is no longer adept at driving wise,
hard bargains that benefit Americans; we are being had, conquered, one
carefully planned step at a time. Even now I can hear the roar
of laughter in Riyadh.
The second prong of the siege of the West by Islam Rising is the
Media Campaign as waged principally by CAIR and other like-minded
organizations. As reported in a previous article here at Catholic
Tradition:
CAIR is the acronym
for The Council on American–Islamic
Relations, a PR front group that presents the good face of Islam to the
public. It has tentacles throughout government and the media
that
either knowingly or stupidly act as propaganda shills for Muslim
extremists. CAIR has strong ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. Both depend
on preventing the public from seeing through their
ultimate goals - Islam the dominant power and belief system in the
world
and the establishment of the Caliphate.
Period.
Only they cannot let us know this.
They exploit
Americans' lack of common sense and reason in re "discrimination" in
order to mis-direct our attention and change our ideas about Islam. The
term Islamphobia is bandied about as if we are all evil for rejecting
elements of Islam or all of it, as we should. One CAIR honcho on one of
their web sites some time ago boasted
about the group's ability to get us to comply in so many words. CAIR -
and or brother PR clansmen -
also has its sinewy clutches into various financial institutions, etc.
I
suspect, although I cannot prove it right now, that CAIR has a hand in
Common Core principles. Certainly at present the American government
schools are pro-Islamic and anti-Christian, very important for CAIR.
There was even a Supreme Court case that did not make it through Certiorari
- in effect, the Islamists won big time in the New York schools because
the Supreme Court permitted a lower court ruling favoring the
favoritism of Islam in public schools over that of the Christians. Just
think about this, folks!
One of the principal spokesmen for CAIR
is Nihad Awad, who presents a polished, serene face of reason but his
face is
two. On the one hand he claims to decry the innocent loss of life,
while on the other hand does not call on Moslems to join in an effort
to discourage terrorist acts. When he comes on as a guest he makes
every attempt to plug the supposed peace of Islam. He lacks credibility
in these quarters, just as his predecessor, Ibrahim Hooper who seemed
more strident and bellicose because of the force of his personality
did. I am almost
certain this is why Hooper has been replaced, or at least does not make
as many guest appearances now in TVland. Awad is there to push the PR
for Islamism first and foremost. Few in the media adequately address
his ploy, if they see it in the first place. While I have my
disagreements with FOX's Bill O'Reilly, he is to be commended for his
astute perceptions of the real persona of Awad & Co., and does not
permit them a forum for their spiel. The News Channel's Jeanine Pirro
and Sean Hannity are two other hosts who are not taken in by CAIR's
cunning and bravo to
them as well! But the "Peace of Islam" agitprop has been effective.
What else explains the left-tilting media's openly expressing the hope,
immediately after the Boston bombings, that it was either a TEA Party
member type or at least some White American, anybody but you know what.
Openly without shame, imagine!
It may also partly explain Obama and his
regime's obvious reluctance to associate any terrorism as Islamist. I
say partly because Obama's father was Moslem and I am sure this is an
important factor where he is concerned; but why the rest of his
administration? The Fort Hood massacre is but "a workplace violence"
and then there is the still unresolved savage attack in Benghazi under
most peculiar
circumstances, coupled with the intentional stonewalling by the State
Department - the refusal to hand over vital records, except a brief
look while under the eye of the officials themselves - no actual
physical handouts to the Congressional Committee according to Rep. Ben
Chavitz.
Elements of CAIR's propaganda points
are issued under the pretext that to oppose their goals is an unworthy
phobia or
an unjust discriminatory stance which they call Islamphobia - they are
adamant - insistent that the media drop the term Islamist, for
instance, although to do so is to disarm Americans in the Islamists'
favor - are found in the public schools as you just read supra; another example was a
California school where the public students were forced to take a class
in Islam, including Ramadan practices, while the same school would not
permit even the name of Christ, no surprise there. And equally expected
because we have to come to know its abject hypocrisy, the ACLU would
not
touch this one with the proverbial ten foot pole, you know the Anti-Christ
Litigation Union, not the American Civil Liberties outfit they bill
themselves as.
Naturally enough, the regime and
its allies have no problem identifying Christians who believe in the
Bible as threats to national security. Hmmm ...
There have been skirmishes and trial runs
such as these here and there over the past several years and we will
see
more of them as each time the Islamists get away with this because we
let
them in our cowardice and do-nothing policy, they will take it for
granted that the public schools belong to them, not just their own
madrassas. Which brings us to one particular, pernicious form, the
Wahhabi - read Saudi Arabian schools which operate freely in the United
States indoctrinating young Muslims into the more radicalized tenets.
My major source for this CAIR segment is
the web site: http://www.thecuttingedgenews.com/index.php?article=53029
The Cutting Edge has learned revealing,
almost unbelievable, but all too believable, unfortunately for us,
things about the close co-ordination between CAIR and the White House, et al, and I quote. text in bold
added by me:
"These reports reveal the depth of the below-the-surface
coordination between the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR),
Hamas, Hezbollah, the Iranian regime and the Muslim Brotherhood in
Egypt, Syria, Tunisia, Libya and Jordan. This bloc of regimes and
organizations is now becoming the greatest Islamist radical lobby ever
to penetrate and infiltrate the White House, Congress, the
State Department and the main decision making centers of the U.S.
government. All of this is happening
at a time when the US government is going through its most
strategically dangerous period in modern times because of its
need to confront the Iranian Mullahs regime, which is expanding in the
Middle East, as well as penetrating the United States, via powerful and
influential allies.
It looks like the near future will uncover many surprises after
the fall of the Gaddafi regime, as we realize more and more that the
popular revolts in the Arab world - and the Obama Administration's
position towards them - were determined by political battles between
various pressure groups in Washington. Moreover, pressures by these
lobbying groups have left an impact on the region's events, the last of
which was the canceling of the visit of Maronite Patriarch Rahi to
Washington. A number of Arab and Western news agencies have leaked that
one of “those who sought to cancel this visit was Dalia Mujahid, a top
advisor on Islamic and Arab affairs at the State Department, who is of
Egyptian origin. And that, said the reports, came at the request of the high command of the Muslim
Brotherhood in Egypt, who wish to see the US Administration support the
Islamist Sunni current."
My main sources for this next portion are
The Sword and the Prophet,
Serge Trifkovic, Regina Orthodox Press, 2002; and the web site:
http://americamagazine.org/issue/425/article/wahhabism-and-jihad
I cite from their article, Wahhabism and Jihad:
"Since the heinous attacks on the
World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001, the
Bush administration has issued an unending stream of statements
informing us that these barbarous crimes were committed by people who
embrace a “perverted version of Islam” or by those who have 'hijacked
Islam.' It is also often assumed that
Islam is a religion of gentleness and peaceful behavior and that no
true Muslim would commit such acts. From the Bush administration's
point of view, it is undoubtedly necessary to generalize in this way,
no matter what the truth may be. Coalitions must be built and
maintained across the world, and Muslim allies or partners must be made
to feel that they are not condemned en masse with the killers.
"But generalizations are always defective in some way, and this
generalization about the nature of the faith and culture of more than a
billion people is massively defective and a burden to sound analysis of
the actual threat facing the United States."
What is the Wahhabi school and
what is its
origin?
For more than two centuries, Wahhabism has been Saudi Arabia's
dominant faith. It is an austere form of Islam that insists on
a literal interpretation of the Koran.
Strict Wahhabis believe that all
those who don't practice their
form of Islam are heathens and enemies. Some Muslims
say that Wahhabism's rigidity has led it to misinterpret and distort
Islam,
pointing to extremists such as Osama bin Laden and the Taliban.
Wahhabism's
explosive growth began in the 1970s when Saudi charities started
"Supreme Savings" funding.
Wahhabi schools (madrassas) and mosques span from Islamabad to Culver
City, California and the east coast in various states.
It began with its founder, Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab who was born in
1703. Wahhab was a zealot who championed the revival of Islam during
the Ottaman Empire's early decline. He wanted Arabia to be purified and
return to what he believed were the true tenets of Islam. Like Mohammed
he married an older, wealthy woman, upon whose death he had the
resources to fund his movement. He was so Puritanical that he condemned
even the decorative aspects of the mosque and wanted a strict
interpretation, literal only, of the Koran, which included the
cessation of veneration of Islam's "holy" persons and shrines. He wrote
his blueprint in the Book of Unity.
By the middle of the century his cause was seeing some success as he
found a wealthy, influential partner in Muhammad ibn Saud, the leader
of a powerful clan of central Arabia. By 1902 a brazen,
adventuresome prince of the ibn Saud family with but 40
warriors on horseback seized control of Riyadh, which was the beginning
to install Wahhabism as the dominant force in Arabia. Muhammad
ibn Abd al-Wahhab is generally called Abdul Wahhab for short. His
descendants still hold the house of Saud. Today Saudi Arabia is the
most repressive Moslem nation. [Trifkovic]
A report by our own State Department provides us with a good idea of
what is in store for us if the Islamists conquer the West, emphasis in
bold added by me:
"Freedom of religion does not exist. Islam is the official religion,
and all citizens must be Muslims. Neither the government nor society in
general accepts the concepts of separation of religion and state, and
such separation does not exist. Under Shari'a, conversion by a Muslim
to another religion is considered apostasy. Public apostasy is a crime
punishable by death if the accused does not recant. Islamic religious
education is mandatory in public schools at all levels. All children
receive religious instruction. ... Citizens
do not have the right to change their government. The Council of Senior
Islamic Scholars ... reviews the government's public policies for
compliance with Shari'a. The
government [views] Islamic law as the only necessary guide to protect
human rights. There is legal and systemic discrimination based on sex
and religion." [U.S. Department of State, Saudi Arabia: Country
Reports on Human Rights -2000. Released by the Bureau of Democracy,
Human Rights, and Labor, January 23, 2001.]
Ultimately we are being undermined from within for the
students are
being converted from Americanism to Islamist guerillas, if not out and
out terrorists, bent on total conversion of this country to Islam one
way or the other and the establishment eventually of Shari'a Law
dominant over western law and its natural law basis.
Some of the Mosques, whether of the Wahhab sect or not are troublesome
for they serve as radicalization, even recruiting facilities as do
some Imams who serve in prison ministry. One such mosque has been much
in
the
news since last week:
The Boston Mosque, the Islamic Society of Boston temporarily threw
out the
elder of the two Boston terrorists - this calculated move made the
Society look good to the media.
Actually it was for only 4 days and he was back in as a full member. He
was expelled for those few days because he wanted to support the
celebration of the US Fourth of July, an anathema to the Mosque VIPs.
[Source: THE BLAZE TV]
On Tuesday, the 24th of April, Glenn Beck interviewed the ever intrepid
Patrick Poole, a terrorist expert - not a regular columnist though -
with PJ Media, Voices for a Free
America:
http://pjmedia.com/
According to Poole, the Mosque had as one of its board members a man
who now heads the Muslim Brotherhood efforts in Syria. The Mosque has
long had ties with the Brotherhood. In fact, according to USA Today "Several people who attended the Islamic
Society of Boston mosque in Cambridge, Mass., have been
investigated for Islamic terrorism." [Oren
Dorell, USA TODAY
10:47 a.m.
EDT
April 24, 2013.]
This concludes our overview surrounding the Boston events portion
of the series.
If you want a more thorough report on the danger of Wahhabism, The Free
Republc web site has an excellent page HERE:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1173310/posts
I presume it is still online - it was posted in July of 2004.
Part 2: Islam Rising: The Sword will be on line this week, most likely
on Friday, April 26 by 9 AM, EDST.
MAIN
INDEX --------------------
E-MAIL
www.catholictradition.org/islamist-watch1.htm