
The Disrobing of Christ
EL GRECO
1577

JESUS IS STRIPPED OF HIS GARMENTS
Commentary the Liturgical Year by Dom Gueranger
for Good Friday
Based on the Office of Tenebræ
Fr. James Groenings, SJ
Taken From THE PASSION OF CHRIST AND ITS HIDDEN MEANING
TAN
BOOKS, with Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur, 908
Then the executioners, having violently stripped Him of His
garments, which had fastened to His wounds, lead Him to the Cross. The
place where He was thus stripped of His garments, and where the cup of
bitter drink was presented to Him, is venerated as the tenth Station
of the Way of the Cross. The first nine, from Pilate's hall to the foot
of Calvary, are still to be seen in the streets of Jerusalem, but the
tenth and the remaining four are in the interior of the church of Holy
Sepulchre, whose spacious walls enclose the spot where the last mysteries of the Passion were accomplished.
But we must here interrupt our history: we have already anticipated the
hours of this great Friday, and we shall have to return, later on, to
the hill of Calvary. It is time to assist at the service of our holy
mother the Church, in which she celebrates the Death of her Sivine
Spouse. We must not wait for the usual summons of the bells; they are
silent; we must listen to the call of our faith and devotion. Let us,
then, repair to the house of God.
. . .
Based on:St. Matthew, xxvii, 33, 34; St. Mark, xv., 22-28; St. Luke, xxiii., 33; St. John, xix., 18.
The last preparations for the crucifixion consisted in offering the
Saviour wine with myrrh and in stripping Him of His garments. The first
incident is narrated by St. Mark in the following terms: "They gave Him
to drink wine mingled with myrrh; but He took it not." The evangelist
St. Matthew describes it thus: "They gave Him wine to drink mingled
with gall. And when He had tasted, He would not drink." Apparently
these two narratives are contradictory in two particulars. St. Mark
says that the wine was mixed with myrrh, whilst St. Matthew says that
it was mixed with gall. Again, the former states that the Saviour did
not drink, while the latter asserts that He tasted and then refused the
potion. But, as stated, the contradiction is only an apparent one. The
Greek word, which we translate as meaning "gall", has a broader
signification. It means not only gall proper, but in general every
bitter, aromatic herb, such as aloes, cassia, saffron and myrrh, and
even every liquid in which such herbs have been steeped. Furthermore,
the second difficulty arising from the fact that St. Mark does not
mention that Christ tasted the myrrh and wine is removed by the
consideration that St. Matthew, in narrating this incident, had in mind
the prophetic passage, "And they gave me gall for my food," [Psalms,
lxviii., 22] which denotes that Christ would actually take some of this
bitter aliment. St. Matthew therefore describes the same incident which
St. Mark records, only more fully and more definitely.
In order to lessen the pains of the execution, it was customary with
the Jews to offer to those who were condemned to death a generous drink
of wine to which had been added benumbing opiates and sleeping potions.
The myrrh also had, to a high degree, the power of deadening the
sensory nerves. Usually it was compassionate women, and sometimes noble
matrons who deemed it an honor to tender this service of charity to the
condemned. In other cases the myrrh and wine was furnished at public
expense. This custom was continued under the Roman prætors.
The drink of criminals was therefore presented to the Redeemer. He
tasted it, but did not empty the cup. He would not die in a condition
of stupor as did the pagan philosopher, Socrates, but in the full
possession of His senses. For, notwithstanding all His sufferings, the
Redeemer had not yet suffered any particular pain in His tongue and in
His palate. This however had to happen to Him as well in reparation for
all sins of the tongue, for all sins of blasphemy, of uncharitable
words, of calumny and of obscene language, as in reparation for all
sins of intemperance, and for all transgressions of the law of fast and
abstinence. For this reason the Saviour sipped the wine which, owing to
the myrrh with which it was mingled, had a very bitter and sickening
taste.
Then Christ was despoiled of His garments. It was a custom of the
Romans to strip to the loin-cloth those who were to die on the cross.
As we have witnessed a similar scene at the scourging, we may pass
briefly over this one. I wish to remark merely that this last disrobing
was much more painful than the first, especially to the sacred shoulder
on which Christ had carried the Cross. The wounds torn open anew,
burned like fire. Moreover, it was much more humiliating because it
took place not only in presence of the soldiers as before, but in
presence of the whole people and of persons of both sexes. But the
Redeemer desired to offer a complete and superabundant satisfaction for
the shameless crimes of mankind, and as He had pledged Himself to
poverty upon His advent into this world, He would remain true to this
pledge until death and die in the embrace of direst poverty.
Contact Us
HOME-------THE HOLY FACE---------STATIONS OF THE CROSS--------SEVEN DOLORS DEVOTION
www.catholictradition.org/Passion/passion24.htm